Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

[Faun]

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

 

[Nostra]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

The "or" is between "letter" and "communication." The word "threatening" applies to both.

Jeesus! Learn English, you brain dead moron.

Third grade English is beyond his cognitive abilities.

 

[Nostra]

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

 

[Faun]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

The "or" is between "letter" and "communication." The word "threatening" applies to both.

Jeesus! Learn English, you brain dead moron.

Third grade English is beyond his cognitive abilities.

LOLOL

Slobbers the dumbfuck who insists Clinton is innocent of lying under oath because the Senate found him not guilty.

 

[Nostra]

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

The "or" is between "letter" and "communication." The word "threatening" applies to both.

Jeesus! Learn English, you brain dead moron.

Third grade English is beyond his cognitive abilities.

LOLOL

Slobbers the dumbfuck who insists Clinton is innocent of lying under oath because the Senate found him not guilty.

^^^^^^Panicking and changing the subject^^^^^

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

LOLOL

There is no such onus on the Congress, ya dumbfuck. They could have gone to court, or they could have withdrawn the subpoenas. They chose neither, nor did they have to.

 

[Faun]

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

The "or" is between "letter" and "communication." The word "threatening" applies to both.

Jeesus! Learn English, you brain dead moron.

Third grade English is beyond his cognitive abilities.

LOLOL

Slobbers the dumbfuck who insists Clinton is innocent of lying under oath because the Senate found him not guilty.

^^^^^^Panicking and changing the subject^^^^^

LOLOL

Pointing out what a moron you are is always part of the subject. Not to mention, talking about "not guilty" equals "innocent" or "exonerated" is what this thread is about.

 

[easyt65]

The 'fastest Impeachment in US history based on ' The weakest case to Impeach in US history' - based on no crime, no evidence, and no witness...after 3.5 years...has been rejected, dismissed....

With 9 more months before the election Democrats have to come up with another huge fake news accusation / attack / story to distract people from their disastrous socialist / communist nightmare platform that vows to reverse the Trump success and put Americans back under economic slavery...

 

[lantern2814]

Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.

Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? Bitch slapped yet again.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck...

"There certainly doesn't have to be a crime." ~ Alan Dershowitz

Regardless, Impeached Trump was impeached on two crimes -- soliciting foreign aid for his re-election campaign and obstructing Congress.

Just keep showing how stupid you are you uneducated eunuch. Exonerated Trump by your claims was accused of a crime, thus making this a criminal proceeding you jackass. You are bitch slapped again little yellow coward. You claim this is not a criminal proceeding, then claim crimes were committed. Damn you are stupid. Slapping you is so easy.

 

[bluzman61]

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

LOLOL

There is no such onus on the Congress, ya dumbfuck. They could have gone to court, or they could have withdrawn the subpoenas. They chose neither, nor did they have to.

Our president's exoneration WAS wonderful, wasn't it?

 

[lantern2814]

Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.

Poor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Amen yet you still have to prove your charges as you continually claim this is a trial that needed witnesses. Thus yes, there is ALWAYS presumption of innocence you uneducated eunuch. Keep showing how totally stupid you are asshole. You are bitch slapped again.

LOL

Keep swingin', Twinky.

Keep showing how stupid and uneducated you are eunuch. No response, no education, and no balls. You’ve been getting butch slapped all over this thread and made to look like the fool you are BOY.

 

[bluzman61]

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

LOLOL

There is no such onus on the Congress, ya dumbfuck. They could have gone to court, or they could have withdrawn the subpoenas. They chose neither, nor did they have to.

Donald J. Trump IS a fantastic president. I'm SO glad you see this. Good for you!

 

[easyt65]

Romney made history, too....the 1st Senate politician who voted against his own party's President in favor of Impeachment...

...and now voters in his own state are trying to initiate a recall of him as their rep.

 

[lantern2814]

Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise.

Trump didn't get off on a technicality. He was exonerated.

LOLOL

Then so was Clinton.

but..but...CLINTON!!!,

 

[j-mac]

Romney made history, too....the 1st Senate politician who voted against his own party's President in favor of Impeachment...

...and now voters in his own state are trying to initiate a recall of him as their rep.

Good for them...That's how it should be when the voters that put him in dislike how he is going against their wishes....

 

[bluzman61]

Romney made history, too....the 1st Senate politician who voted against his own party's President in favor of Impeachment...

...and now voters in his own state are trying to initiate a recall of him as their rep.

Yep. Romney suffers from what John McStain suffered from. Hideous envy and jealousy of President Trump because they weren't able to accomplish what HE did. Win an election and be president of the USA. I believe it's as simple as that.

 

[lantern2814]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

No it isn’t you dumbestfuck. Contesting subpoenas in Court is a LEGAL option that you assholes CHOSE not to pursue. You’re so stupid you don’t even remember your own name most of the time do you? Of course when you’re getting beaten down like this (as usual for you) you try to forget.

 

[bluzman61]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

I'm SO very glad that you see our president's exoneration as something wonderful. Thank you!

 

[Nostra]

Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? Bitch slapped yet again.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck...

"There certainly doesn't have to be a crime." ~ Alan Dershowitz

Regardless, Impeached Trump was impeached on two crimes -- soliciting foreign aid for his re-election campaign and obstructing Congress.

Just keep showing how stupid you are you uneducated eunuch. Exonerated Trump by your claims was accused of a crime, thus making this a criminal proceeding you jackass. You are bitch slapped again little yellow coward. You claim this is not a criminal proceeding, then claim crimes were committed. Damn you are stupid. Slapping you is so easy.

It all depends on what he is currently getting his ass kicked on whether or not this was a criminal/court/political proceeding. He flip-flops to whatever he thinks makes his case.

His is a blithering idiot in the midst of an Epic Meltdown.

 

[WEATHER53]

Just like after the Mueller thing, this is Case Closed and Over libs no matter how many post Morten “bombshells” you conjour up and throw out.