Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

[bripat9643]

There were no charges. They wasted about a hundred million so far. Even if it could happen, it’s not. Why don’t you write the president a letter, expressing your feelings. I’m sure you’ll receive a response. [emoji1787] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sure there were. He was charged with soliciting foreign interference to help with his re-election. That's a crime. And he was charged with obstructing Congress. That's also a crime.

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

 

[Faun]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

 

[bripat9643]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

They weren't listed in the impeachment, dumbass.

Again, fucking moron, statutes are never listed in articles of impeachment. I challenged you to show me the statute for perjury in Impeached Clinton's articles of impeachment and you failed miserably. Still, the articles of impeachment against Impeached Trump describe the laws he broke, just like the ones against Clinton.

The didn't list a statute, but the did spefically use the word perjury. For example:

"(1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading."

On the other hand, the articles in the Trump impeachment do not refer to the crimes you claim. They do not mention "illegal campaign donations."

^^^ watch the fucking moron backpedal as fast as his tiny legs allow.

Fucking moron, you said it had to list the statutes.

Wrong again, brainless. Allow me to quote what I said:

"They weren't listed in the impeachment, dumbass."

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

 

[Nostra]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

The communication must be threatening, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

The communication must be threatening, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Have you ever noticed how the more FAUX paints himself into a corner the stronger the expletives and insults become?

 

[Faun]

Sure there were. He was charged with soliciting foreign interference to help with his re-election. That's a crime. And he was charged with obstructing Congress. That's also a crime.

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

 

[Nostra]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

The communication must be threatening, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Have you ever noticed how the more FAUX paints himself into a corner the stronger the expletives and insults become?

His meltdown is more epic than the ones Dimwingers had in Nov 2016.

 

[Faun]

Sure there were. He was charged with soliciting foreign interference to help with his re-election. That's a crime. And he was charged with obstructing Congress. That's also a crime.

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

 

[Nostra]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

 

[Nostra]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

Challenging the validity of subpoenas ISN'T a crime. That is what happened.

Your claim they just ignored them is just another of your many lies.

 

[bripat9643]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yes, he instructed them. How does that equate to a "threatening communication?" If I worked for Trump and he told me to refuse to testify to Congress I would say "with pleasure sir." People don't work for Trump because they are eager to do Adolph Schiffler's bidding, you fucking dumbass.

 

[Faun]

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

They weren't listed in the impeachment, dumbass.

Again, fucking moron, statutes are never listed in articles of impeachment. I challenged you to show me the statute for perjury in Impeached Clinton's articles of impeachment and you failed miserably. Still, the articles of impeachment against Impeached Trump describe the laws he broke, just like the ones against Clinton.

The didn't list a statute, but the did spefically use the word perjury. For example:

"(1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading."

On the other hand, the articles in the Trump impeachment do not refer to the crimes you claim. They do not mention "illegal campaign donations."

^^^ watch the fucking moron backpedal as fast as his tiny legs allow.

Fucking moron, you said it had to list the statutes.

Wrong again, brainless. Allow me to quote what I said:

"They weren't listed in the impeachment, dumbass."

LOL

Now let me quote what you actually said before you moved the goal posts...

"The Dims didn't list either statute"​

 

[bripat9643]

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

Challenging the validity of subpoenas ISN'T a crime. That is what happened.

Your claim they just ignored them is just another of your many lies.

Basically the hooligans in the House objected to Trump following the standard legal procedure for contesting a Congressional subpoena.

 

[jc456]

poor dumbass rw's

they whine Trump didnt commit a crime for weeks on end - NO EVIDENCE

now the stupid bitches are saying he was acquitted/exonerated ..

f'n idiots beyond compare.

Democrats had 17 witnesses, had a chance to call more witnesses... voted and then failed. They did a shit job of trying to impeach a president and made an embarrassment of themselves and the process. Trump is exonerated where it counts, with the American people.

Douchebag Don blocked witnesses and documents

go away now

How did he do that? You don’t understand jurisprudence do you! Ever hear of pleading the fifth? Anything?

 

[Faun]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

 

[Nostra]

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

Challenging the validity of subpoenas ISN'T a crime. That is what happened.

Your claim they just ignored them is just another of your many lies.

Basically the hooligans in the House objected to Trump following the standard legal procedure for contesting a Congressional subpoena.

They had sound legal grounds for doing so...............they wanted to get impeachment done by Christmas so they could go on vacation.

 

[bripat9643]

Link us up to those statutes, Sport.

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

It's not a crime unless you do it after the SC has overruled your objection.

 

[Nostra]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

by any threatening letter or communication


Yep, by any threatening letter or threatening communication. You don't know basic English, Fuckwit.

The adjective "threatening" applies to both "letter" and "communication".

Definition of adjective
(Entry 1 of 2)

: a word belonging to one of the major form classes in any of numerous languages and typically serving as a modifier of a noun to denote a quality of the thing named, to indicate its quantity or extent, or to specify a thing as distinct from something else

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently a boss giving instructions to his employees is now a "threatening letter or communication."

LOLOLOLOLOL

Yes, fucking moron, giving instructions is communicating.

Do they breed you freaks to be this ignorant?

It's a "threatening communication?" Wow, I never realized it was a crime for Trump to give instructions to his employees!

Holyfuckingshit!

Fucking moron... learn the meaning of the word, "or."

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences...​

The "or" is between "letter" and "communication." The word "threatening" applies to both.

Jeesus! Learn English, you brain dead moron.