Trump hit with criminal charges in New York, a first for a US ex-president -New York Times

[Meister]

Remember when Trump claimed he would eliminate the debt in eight years?

I do.

You only gave him 4 years.
Remember when trump proclaimed the capital of Israel was Jerusalem and moved the embassy there?
Do you realize how many other presidents had promised to do just that? Of course, you don't.

 

[Marener]

You only gave him 4 years.
Remember when trump proclaimed the capital of Israel was Jerusalem and moved the embassy there?
Do you realize how many other presidents had promised to do just that? Of course, you don't.

Wow. You’re right. I almost forgot about that because it was just so inconsequential. It was also something that was trivially easy for him to do.

Please provide me with a list of presidents who promises to do just that.

I’ll keep working on the list of stupid nonsense his followers thought he was going to do.

 

[Meister]

Wow. You’re right. I almost forgot about that because it was just so inconsequential. It was also something that was trivially easy for him to do.

Please provide me with a list of presidents who promises to do just that.

I’ll keep working on the list of stupid nonsense his followers thought he was going to do.

Montage: Past Presidents Promise to Move U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem

Clinton, Bush, and Obama had also promised to move the U.S. embassy

news.grabien.com

 

[Marener]

Montage: Past Presidents Promise to Move U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem

Clinton, Bush, and Obama had also promised to move the U.S. embassy

news.grabien.com

Nice link.

Notice how neither Obama’s or Clinton’s statement mention the embassy at all?

So, yeah. Not true.

 

[Meister]

Nice link.

Notice how neither Obama’s or Clinton’s statement mention the embassy at all?

So, yeah. Not true.

Nice link.

Notice how neither Obama’s or Clinton’s statement mention the embassy at all?

So, yeah. Not true.

You are a lazy one, darling. And again in denial.
Now read it and weap, darling.....and get me a ham sammich.

During the 2000 election campaign, George W. Bush criticized Clinton for not moving the embassy as he had promised to do, and said he planned on initiating the process himself as soon as he was elected. However, once he took office, he backed down on his promise.[27]

In 2008, Democratic candidate Barack Obama called Jerusalem the 'capital of Israel'. On June 4, 2008, Obama told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), in his first foreign policy speech after capturing the Democratic nomination the day before, that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." However, he backtracked almost immediately, saying "Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations."[29]

United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[beautress]

Nice link.

Notice how neither Obama’s or Clinton’s statement mention the embassy at all?

So, yeah. Not true.

Yes, it's true, Marener.
This backs up Meister fully:

United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Marener]

In 2008, Democratic candidate Barack Obama called Jerusalem the 'capital of Israel'. On June 4, 2008, Obama told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), in his first foreign policy speech after capturing the Democratic nomination the day before, that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." However, he backtracked almost immediately, saying "Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations

No mention of the embassy in that paragraph.

Again, inconsequential and trivially easy. But that’s the best you can do.

He said he’d invest half a trillion in infrastructure with taxes only paying for 10% of it. The other 90% was going to come from someone else, somehow.

Or how about 6% GDP growth?

 

[Rumpole]

I'll bet you read and give a pass to the lies spread by the New York Times though.

New York Times is one of the Four American Journals of record. has won 132 Pulitzers -- it is one of the most sourced publications in the world.

Can any news source get facts wrong? Sure.

But no source has pundits tell outright lies they know is a lie, where the texts and emails prove it, to the extent that is Fox News.

 

[Rumpole]

As am I. I don't see a lot happening at all beyond a blip in the media to distract from other dumpster fires. I hope they aren't hanging their case on the testimony of a proven perjurer.

Prosecutors have tons of experience prosecuting criminals. It's common, when prosecuting criminals, that a witness will be a criminal. Now, while you make think is perjury charge is an issue, understand why he was charged with perjury --- for lying to protect Trump, at a time when he was loyal to him. After serving time in prison, and after Trump through his long time loyal attorney under the bus, he has no reason to lie. I think he will find friends in the jury of New Yorkers.

 

[Stann]

And it seemed Pence cooperated fully.

Pence is a good man, even though he's a bigot. I believe he did the right thing too. People make mistakes, but you can't defend people who make them on purpose.

 

[Stann]

Prosecutors have tons of experience prosecuting criminals. It's common, when prosecuting criminals, that a witness will be a criminal. Now, while you make think is perjury charge is an issue, understand why he was charged with perjury --- for lying to protect Trump, at a time when he was loyal to him. After serving time in prison, and after Trump through his long time loyal attorney under the bus, he has no reason to lie. I think he will find friends in the jury of New Yorkers.

Trump would throw his own mother under the bus if it served his interests. All the fraud he's caused has no doubt burned hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions. They've got their work cut out for them dealing with such a scoundrel.

 

[Dr Grump]

Taking money from China isn’t illegal. Trump does it.

Not only that, he manufactures his ties there.

 

[Stann]

taking millions from china for starters.....why did the communist like him so much

You'd have to charge most businessmen in the country then. Everyone who's anyone has dealings with China. They are taking money from US for goods and services rendered, we are making money off those goods. It's called international trade.

 

[Dr Grump]

This will backfire on the sewage slime that is the democrat party. Polls are now surging pro-Trump.

Nah, the only people who will back Trump are the same Deplorables who voted for him. You know those morally enshrined perfect citizens who don't mind if their leader pay porn stars to fuck them, or don't mind if he grabs women by the pussy, or don't mind him being disgusting towards injured veterans even though the pussy himself never served. They're the quality of people who vote for him. Sounds like a whole bunch of people who made America great.

 

[Dr Grump]

Oh you mean like Liz Cheney.

Don't forget her dad while your at it.

 

[Dr Grump]

Nugent was able to have the medical personnel declare him ineligible for service. That is not dodging the draft any more than having your status changed because of childhood asthma, while playing sports.

Or getting a gig in the national guard 'cause your daddy knows people.

 

[Stann]

Nugent was able to have the medical personnel declare him ineligible for service. That is not dodging the draft any more than having your status changed because of childhood asthma, while playing sports.

Or playing sports with foot spurs. But most people don't even realize they have them, and play sports. Nice excuse if you are a coward and don't want to serve.

 

[scruffy]

the Democratic party had nothing to do with this indictment in NY....

Not even you believe that.

The Democratic party likely wished he would have let the other indictments go first from the Georgia DA and the Special Counsel investigation....

Really? And you would know this... how?

but they are NOT coordinating with each other, they each have their own separate crimes....and Bragg bringing charges first, clearly shows this.

lol

 

[Care4all]

Not even you believe that.






Really? And you would know this... how?




lol

-yes I do!

-we talk with keyboards now a days.... I can read what they are saying about it.

no one in the Party wanted this white collar cooking the books, case to be brought before the much more important to our Nation case indictments..... The party knows Trump will now use this pidley case, as a distraction and make it a circus, as he has.... Bragg under estimated the circus Trump would bring...

the Democratic Party knew.... Bragg's a lone wolf on this one.

 

[scruffy]

-yes I do!

-we talk with keyboards now a days.... I can read what they are saying about it.

no one in the Party wanted this white collar cooking the books, case to be brought before the much more important to our Nation case indictments..... The party knows Trump will now use this pidley case, as a distraction and make it a circus, as he has.... Bragg under estimated the circus Trump would bring...

the Democratic Party knew.... Bragg's a lone wolf on this one.

Smells like backpedaling.

You know the case is weak so you're trying to distance yourself from it.