1997 Ford Models event - Newspapers.com
Clipping found in The Daily News published in New York, New York on 10/31/1997. 1997 Ford Models event
![www.newspapers.com](https://www.newspapers.com/apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png)
Another one, here with Maxwell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So tell us the details of the photo. When was it taken? What were the circumstances?It's none of those things to me you describe. Just because you're ignorant of that photo doesn't mean others are.
Mindless cutting and pasting? As opposed to simply accepting what your eyes are telling you?Not surprising you would defend mindless cutting and pasting of an unsourced, undated photo you can't identify as authentic.
Don't worry. Your TDS is a shared affliction among self- loathing Dems / Marxists
Aww, thats so cute. You're desperate to defend Sloppy Joe and his child licking. You feel slighted, right?Are we talking about the pussy grabber that was just recently found guilty in the Carroll case and has to pay her five million bucks.
Ps. Don't forget to send him some money. Cause they are really after YOU. lol
The politics of this are such as I see it.
It may be bad news for Biden; if I'm Biden, I want Trump. My calculus is this.
The average Trump supporter is the same guy who voted for Romney, McCain, and would have voted for Satan himself if there was an R next to his name on the ballot. They will turn out for whomever has an R next to their name in November 2024 whether it's the blob or not.
The average Republican who can't stand Trump will stay home if it's the blob on the ticket. They will find a way to stomach a woman, a black, or anyone else. Not the blob.
So I think this actually hurts Biden.
Haven't you been informed that Joe is a bit stale upstairs and doesn't know what he's doing?Aww, thats so cute. You're desperate to defend Sloppy Joe and his child licking. You feel slighted, right?
So, correct. You know nothing of an unsourced, undated photo you desperately want to create an entire narrative around, while being completely ignorant of facts.Mindless cutting and pasting? As opposed to simply accepting what your eyes are telling you?
I provided the source for 2 separate photos one with Maxwell and another one with Epstein and Maxwell. What do you have to doubt it.
Normal people don't think about pedo 24/7. BDS losers do. That's why people hide their children and pets from BDS pervs. And it's why children and animals instincatively shy away from BDS pervs. Children and animals can detect the perversion radiating from BDS pervs.Aww, thats so cute. You're desperate to defend Sloppy Joe and his child licking. You feel slighted, right?
1. He was a criminal, not all that shrewd, as we can all see
2. Now he's a senile old man. Here he is again, embarrassing the entire nation, reading off cue cards when he should just be speaking with a national leader
If you want your own, personal, Sloppy Joe licking, send him an email.Haven't you been informed that Joe is a bit stale upstairs and doesn't know what he's doing?
I wouldn't accuse you of being a normal person.Normal people don't think about pedo 24/7. BDS losers do. That's why people hide their children and pets from BDS pervs. And it's why children and animals instincatively shy away from BDS pervs. Children and animals can detect the perversion radiating from BDS pervs.
So, what other pervy fantasies have your Chinese masters told you to share with us? Don't hold pack. Your pervy pals want more wank material.
So tell us the details of the photo. When was it taken? What were the circumstances?
Obviously you're completely ignorant and don't have a clue. Why would you announce on a public message board you're clueless and ignorant?
Those photos have date, location and original source beneath them.You on the other hand can't voice a reason for your skepticism of the veracity of the photos.So, correct. You know nothing of an unsourced, undated photo you desperately want to create an entire narrative around, while being completely ignorant of facts.
Sloppy Joe should hire you for the "Truth Bureau", you know, the position vacated by the misfit who sang songs on YouTube.
Only the worst of the worst for the Dems / Marxists.
The earlier photo had nothing of the kind. You're just dishonest.Those photos have date, location and original source beneath them.You on the other hand can't voice a reason for your skepticism of the veracity of the photos.
You're just in denialThe earlier photo had nothing of the kind. You're just dishonest.
You can't support your false claims.You're just in denial
The first photo was from an article in Vanity Fair taken at MarOLago in 2000 courtesy of Davidov studios and Getty images. So we have multiple photos and Faun provided footage.The earlier photo had nothing of the kind. You're just dishonest.
You can actually use the Googles and check it out yourself. The truth will set you free.You can't support your false claims.
I thought so. You have nothing but "because I say so" to support your claims to an unsourced, undated photo which you suggest is 23 years old.The first photo was from an article in Vanity Fair taken at MarOLago in 2000 courtesy of Davidov studios and Getty images. So we have multiple photos and Faun provided footage.
So are you still denying that Trump knew and was friendly with both Epstein and Maxwell?