Trump is your retribution, but is he your salvation?

Dont try to change the subject

You cant prove that QAnon exists
But a Google search for “QAnon” returns just shy of 25 million related webpages, and many of them would have pointed Carlson and his team in the direction of 8kun, the website where the pseudonymous leader of the cult, known only as Q, has posted almost 5,000 messages.
Or to one of the dozens of websites that are trying to cash in on QAnon’s popularity by cataloging those posts.
Facebook and Twitter have removed a lot of the major QAnon accounts in recent months, but maybe Carlson’s team could have looked a little further, to say Telegram, which has become a hive of QAnon activity, and some of the biggest QAnon channels have hundreds of thousands of followers.
 
I guess you don't how the burden of proof works. Anyway, "Nobody fucks Glasnost except Mrs. Glasnost".

- Jules Winnfield
If you have factual evidence showing one of my posts to be in error, present it. Otherwise, fuck off.
 
But a Google search for “QAnon” returns just shy of 25 million related webpages,
How do you do that?

My Google search does not show how many official QAnon web pages are found

And not 25 million related web pages whatever that means

I would like to know your source
 
This obscene child is their leader, their earthly deity, their role model, their hero, their savior:

 
This obscene child is their leader, their earthly deity, their role model, their hero, their savior:


RINOs against Trump. Surprise, surprise. Bunch of dickless, unprincipled crybabies who side with the enemy 100% of the time.
 
The empirical results from this study of the Trump Administration's response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, much like the ones reported from previous cases of strategic surprise and policy failure, such as 9/11 or the Hurricane Katrina response (Parker et al., 2009; Parker & Stern, 2002, 2005), suggest that leadership is a key underlying determinant in all three perspectives. Leaders, like their followers, are human and susceptible to the various forms of cognitive and motivational biases outlined above. Furthermore, leaders set the tone not only for their advisory groups and networks but to a large extent for the wider executive branch bureaucracies as well (George & Stern, 2002; Preston, 2001; Preston & 't Hart, 1999; Stern & Sundelius, 1997).

Malignant forms of bureaucratic politics flourish and organizational logjams persist when leaders (or their surrogates) fail to create a transparent interagency decision‐making process, cut through the red tape, or set constructive norms for policy discourse (Rosati, 2000). Donald Trump and his top officials failed to provide scientifically informed, normative leadership, resulting in fierce infighting between multiple power centers, blame‐shifting, ambiguity regarding who was in charge, and a delayed, disorganized response to the pandemic.

Finally, from an agenda‐political perspective, although others may be more or less skillful in securing access and making their cases for preferred policies, the buck stops in the Oval Office. The definitive duty for setting the political and policy agenda rests with the White House. When the executive initially suggests that the stock market and not public health is of the utmost importance and makes it clear that bad news is unwelcome, shifting priorities and rapidly responding and adjusting to new information becomes difficult. At the end of the day, presidents are responsible for (although not entirely in control of) the political agenda.


The botched response to COVID was one of his biggest failures of many.
 
The empirical results from this study of the Trump Administration's response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, much like the ones reported from previous cases of strategic surprise and policy failure, such as 9/11 or the Hurricane Katrina response (Parker et al., 2009; Parker & Stern, 2002, 2005), suggest that leadership is a key underlying determinant in all three perspectives. Leaders, like their followers, are human and susceptible to the various forms of cognitive and motivational biases outlined above. Furthermore, leaders set the tone not only for their advisory groups and networks but to a large extent for the wider executive branch bureaucracies as well (George & Stern, 2002; Preston, 2001; Preston & 't Hart, 1999; Stern & Sundelius, 1997).

Malignant forms of bureaucratic politics flourish and organizational logjams persist when leaders (or their surrogates) fail to create a transparent interagency decision‐making process, cut through the red tape, or set constructive norms for policy discourse (Rosati, 2000). Donald Trump and his top officials failed to provide scientifically informed, normative leadership, resulting in fierce infighting between multiple power centers, blame‐shifting, ambiguity regarding who was in charge, and a delayed, disorganized response to the pandemic.

Finally, from an agenda‐political perspective, although others may be more or less skillful in securing access and making their cases for preferred policies, the buck stops in the Oval Office. The definitive duty for setting the political and policy agenda rests with the White House. When the executive initially suggests that the stock market and not public health is of the utmost importance and makes it clear that bad news is unwelcome, shifting priorities and rapidly responding and adjusting to new information becomes difficult. At the end of the day, presidents are responsible for (although not entirely in control of) the political agenda.


The botched response to COVID was one of his biggest failures of many.
Trump did a good job under the circumstances
 
Since you cant find the official QAnon web page why dont you ask trump for it and use it to answer my question?
You're going in circles. It's already been established racism exists though it doesn't have a website. Trump has acknowledged people who have adopted beliefs associated with QAnon like him and he complimented them. You seem to be having trouble accepting this basic fact. I understand why.
 
Trump did a good job under the circumstances
Sadly, I'm sure you will take that misinformed belief to the grave. Like many in The Following.

The US, although it represents just 4% of the world's population, accounted for over 20% of all confirmed COVID‐19 cases and deaths worldwide that took place on Trump's watch (Johns Hopkins University, 2022). This outcome was not inevitable. With a timelier, focused, scientifically informed, and sustained whole‐of‐government response, it has been estimated that hundreds of thousands of COVID‐19 deaths could have been avoided (Redlener et al., 2020; Woolhandler et al., 2021). Ultimately, in the US system, as the commander‐in‐chief, presidents are responsible for the decisions the federal government makes or fails to make, the mobilization and coordination of the federal response to national crises, and setting and enforcing the proper priorities. In the final analysis, when it comes to assessing responsibility for the avoidable failures of the federal government's COVID‐19 performance, the evidence examined here indicates that, while not responsible for everything that went wrong, President Trump was a decisive factor behind the tragically sub‐optimal US pandemic response.
 
Sadly, I'm sure you will take that misinformed belief to the grave. Like many in The Following.

The US, although it represents just 4% of the world's population, accounted for over 20% of all confirmed COVID‐19 cases and deaths worldwide that took place on Trump's watch (Johns Hopkins University, 2022). This outcome was not inevitable. With a timelier, focused, scientifically informed, and sustained whole‐of‐government response, it has been estimated that hundreds of thousands of COVID‐19 deaths could have been avoided (Redlener et al., 2020; Woolhandler et al., 2021). Ultimately, in the US system, as the commander‐in‐chief, presidents are responsible for the decisions the federal government makes or fails to make, the mobilization and coordination of the federal response to national crises, and setting and enforcing the proper priorities. In the final analysis, when it comes to assessing responsibility for the avoidable failures of the federal government's COVID‐19 performance, the evidence examined here indicates that, while not responsible for everything that went wrong, President Trump was a decisive factor behind the tragically sub‐optimal US pandemic response.

Yes, those inflated death stats were very impressive!

Were Cuomo and Whitmer right when they put COVID patients into nursing homes?
 
Is this what success looks like to Repubs?

Yawn.

It's called politics.

It's all about the purse strings.

Which you clowns are abusing, on top of a total failure in management.

Not to mention your senile old doddering fool of a leader.
 
Populist movement? It was bought and paid for by wealthy conservatives and corporate donors like Big Oil.
Horseshit.

That's an outright leftard lie, and you know it.

Donald Trump defeated 16 other Republican candidates in the first primary, many of whom WERE beholden to Big Oil.

Then he beat Hillary because she's a liar from hell and everyone knows it.

You're in no position to bitch. The simple truth is, in spite of his many flaws Donald Trump stands head and shoulders above any of the other candidates.
 

Forum List

Back
Top