Trump Issues Veiled Threat.....Again

IDK the context, but I fear you don't either. I wonder if he was referring to voting?



You think the Second Amendment is about voting rights?
retarded-boy.gif


I guess that means no.
I was talking about gun owners voting in the upcoming general election genius. Goddamn, and I thought sarah was dumb :lol:



And I mistakenly thought you had read the OP. When Trump says that he thinks the "2nd Amendment people" might be able to stop Hillary, he's not talking about voting rights, idiot.
 
She wants to let people sue gun manufacturers when some dumbass ghetto dweller shoots another dumbass ghetto dweller.
She is for assisted suicide yet she uses suicide deaths as a reason for gun control.
She also wants to add huge fees to own guns and she wants to ban the co called assault rifle.
Hillary is about as anti gun as you can get....she's just to big of a chickenshit to call for an outright ban.

I guess then you support the people who might want to exercise their 2nd Amendment assassination rights.

So your argument is going to be based on some made up shit you pulled from your bunghole......all righty then.

So you wish to state for the record that Americans have NO right to take up arms against the government,

no matter what the 2nd Amendment might say or imply?

You're not even worth conversing with.
There is no such thing as the right to assassinate.

Then we can dismiss the idiocy of all your RW pals who claim the 2nd Amendment is about the right of the American people to take up arms against their government?

No shit. I've been you nuts that for years.

Once more in English please.
But I think I got the gist of your garbled bullshit so i'll try and give it ago...
The 2nd amendment is indeed intended to oust a government that subverts the Constitution.
 
I guess then you support the people who might want to exercise their 2nd Amendment assassination rights.

assassination rights?

th

That's what the nutcase wing of the gunrights crowd claims,

that the 2nd Amendment is there to protect the citizens' right to own guns,

so in the event that they believe the government has become too tyrannical, they can take up arms against it.

Assassination of the 'tyrants' would fall perfectly into that action.

You dumb shit! That's was exactly the intent the framers had in mind with the 2nd amendment.
Dont try and subvert the Bill Of Rights or the Constitution and you'll have nothing to worry about.
The framers meant the 2nd as a tool to assassinate a democratically elected president over a hypothetical? Are you fucking serious?

Who the hell said that you moron?
Your idiot buddy. I will admit I get the two of you confused with you similar screen names and all round retardation.
 
assassination rights?

th

That's what the nutcase wing of the gunrights crowd claims,

that the 2nd Amendment is there to protect the citizens' right to own guns,

so in the event that they believe the government has become too tyrannical, they can take up arms against it.

Assassination of the 'tyrants' would fall perfectly into that action.

You dumb shit! That's was exactly the intent the framers had in mind with the 2nd amendment.
Dont try and subvert the Bill Of Rights or the Constitution and you'll have nothing to worry about.

Then why is everything else in the Constitution AGAINST armed rebellion?

It's not armed rebellion when protecting the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
It's ousting a tyrannical government that subverted our Constitution ya dipshit.

So now your'e back to assassination being constitutional?

Fuck me!!!!!
He's getting dizzy from all the spinning.
 
Hillary has to wait until Obama gets off his ass & takes all your guns away.... isn't he supposta impose marshal law just b4 the election & serve a 3rd term? :afro:

So, you're a moron.

Typical of leftists. The democrats have fought a protracted war on the Bill of Rights. Due mostly to the late HONORABLE Justice Scalia, the democrats have failed in their attempts to end 1st and 2nd Amendments, but have been more successful in their assault on the 4th.

We have dishonorable scum on the SCOTUS, Ginsburg and Kagan. Sotomayor is dumb as a brick. That is three who will shit on the Constitution in every case. Bryer is left leaning, but has some honor. IF Hillary can pack 2 justices onto the court, the Constitution is over.

The court can and will declare that the freedom of religion does not extend to public interaction, That the right of free speech does not include speech the state or the party finds offensive, that the right of a free press does not include criticism of the party. And of course that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is not a right of the people, but only the state.

You Khmer Rouge democrats can't succeed in repealing the Bill of Rights, but the ONLY thing stopping the democrats from crushing rights so far has been the court smacking you down, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, Heller, etc. But the democrats are ALWAYS seeking ways to end civil rights, the MOMENT that there is not a block against democrats crushing rights, they are gone, With a predatory SCOTUS that seeks an end to Constitutional rights - such as the one Hillary Clinton promises to create, then civil rights will be gone. At such point, it is the responsibility of the people to regain our rights and Constitution through any and all means.
 
lol

All I can do is laugh at this point.

He's not going to be President.

But if he was, we'd hear shit like this pretty much every day for four years.

He's never going to change. He's never going to "pivot." He's never going to sound Presidential.
 
assassination rights?

th

That's what the nutcase wing of the gunrights crowd claims,

that the 2nd Amendment is there to protect the citizens' right to own guns,

so in the event that they believe the government has become too tyrannical, they can take up arms against it.

Assassination of the 'tyrants' would fall perfectly into that action.

You dumb shit! That's was exactly the intent the framers had in mind with the 2nd amendment.
Dont try and subvert the Bill Of Rights or the Constitution and you'll have nothing to worry about.

Then why is everything else in the Constitution AGAINST armed rebellion?

It's not armed rebellion when protecting the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
It's ousting a tyrannical government that subverted our Constitution ya dipshit.
What tyrannical government would that be, .214.

He's referring to the tyranny that Tim McVeigh (apparently rightfully) rebelled against.
 
Every fucking time Trump looks like He's going to focus on the election
He goes off and gives the Dems a chance to break his balls....
Now it's going to be that he want's people who own guns to .....
I have no idea what he wants.....

He leaves the door open again and again for the Dems to go after him.....

Is this the WWE for God's sake....
Is he working to get Hillary elected.....
And in the end he has all this exposure from a national campaign.....

Is the Trump campaign nothing more then Trump trying to advance
his brand nation wide...

This is getting old...
He is a very small vindictive person that needs an excuse to lose.
 
Hillary has to wait until Obama gets off his ass & takes all your guns away.... isn't he supposta impose marshal law just b4 the election & serve a 3rd term? :afro:

So, you're a moron.

Typical of leftists. The democrats have fought a protracted war on the Bill of Rights. Due mostly to the late HONORABLE Justice Scalia, the democrats have failed in their attempts to end 1st and 2nd Amendments, but have been more successful in their assault on the 4th.

We have dishonorable scum on the SCOTUS, Ginsburg and Kagan. Sotomayor is dumb as a brick. That is three who will shit on the Constitution in every case. Bryer is left leaning, but has some honor. IF Hillary can pack 2 justices onto the court, the Constitution is over.

The court can and will declare that the freedom of religion does not extend to public interaction, That the right of free speech does not include speech the state or the party finds offensive, that the right of a free press does not include criticism of the party. And of course that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is not a right of the people, but only the state.

You Khmer Rouge democrats can't succeed in repealing the Bill of Rights, but the ONLY thing stopping the democrats from crushing rights so far has been the court smacking you down, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, Heller, etc. But the democrats are ALWAYS seeking ways to end civil rights, the MOMENT that there is not a block against democrats crushing rights, they are gone, With a predatory SCOTUS that seeks an end to Constitutional rights - such as the one Hillary Clinton promises to create, then civil rights will be gone. At such point, it is the responsibility of the people to regain our rights and Constitution through any and all means.

Liberals have fought to expand rights.

Where are the conservative fights to expand rights?
 
Hillary has to wait until Obama gets off his ass & takes all your guns away.... isn't he supposta impose marshal law just b4 the election & serve a 3rd term? :afro:

So, you're a moron.

Typical of leftists. The democrats have fought a protracted war on the Bill of Rights. Due mostly to the late HONORABLE Justice Scalia, the democrats have failed in their attempts to end 1st and 2nd Amendments, but have been more successful in their assault on the 4th.

We have dishonorable scum on the SCOTUS, Ginsburg and Kagan. Sotomayor is dumb as a brick. That is three who will shit on the Constitution in every case. Bryer is left leaning, but has some honor. IF Hillary can pack 2 justices onto the court, the Constitution is over.

The court can and will declare that the freedom of religion does not extend to public interaction, That the right of free speech does not include speech the state or the party finds offensive, that the right of a free press does not include criticism of the party. And of course that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is not a right of the people, but only the state.

You Khmer Rouge democrats can't succeed in repealing the Bill of Rights, but the ONLY thing stopping the democrats from crushing rights so far has been the court smacking you down, Citizens United, Hobby Lobby, Heller, etc. But the democrats are ALWAYS seeking ways to end civil rights, the MOMENT that there is not a block against democrats crushing rights, they are gone, With a predatory SCOTUS that seeks an end to Constitutional rights - such as the one Hillary Clinton promises to create, then civil rights will be gone. At such point, it is the responsibility of the people to regain our rights and Constitution through any and all means.

So you expect Clinton to try to abolish abortion rights and same sex marriage rights?
 
I honestly don't think he was making threats. He was saying that those who believe in 2nd amendment rights would come out and vote for him.

But he has no filter. He's tone deaf. He doesn't understand that what he says can be misconstrued, even if he didn't mean it.

He's going to get crushed in November.
 
IDK the context, but I fear you don't either. I wonder if he was referring to voting?



You think the Second Amendment is about voting rights?
retarded-boy.gif


I guess that means no.
I was talking about gun owners voting in the upcoming general election genius. Goddamn, and I thought sarah was dumb :lol:



And I mistakenly thought you had read the OP. When Trump says that he thinks the "2nd Amendment people" might be able to stop Hillary, he's not talking about voting rights, idiot.
:lmao:
 
Every fucking time Trump looks like He's going to focus on the election
He goes off and gives the Dems a chance to break his balls....
Now it's going to be that he want's people who own guns to .....
I have no idea what he wants.....

He leaves the door open again and again for the Dems to go after him.....

Is this the WWE for God's sake....
Is he working to get Hillary elected.....
And in the end he has all this exposure from a national campaign.....

Is the Trump campaign nothing more then Trump trying to advance
his brand nation wide...

This is getting old...
He is a very small vindictive person that needs an excuse to lose.

The guy is driving ME absolutely Bat shit crazy.....
Every time I find a way to vote for him he goes off with this type of stuff......

Granted he's not a professional politician but for God's sake
he needs to be a whole lot smarter then this....

I have no idea what his end game is....
Hillary can be beaten....
That is if the opponent really wants to....

I give up.
 
on cnn... rep. Duncan Hunter basically says we can't look at the actual words trump uses because he's not an english professor or a politician. he's a businessman, so he doesn't know how to articulate what he means.
 
The guy is driving ME absolutely Bat shit crazy.....
Every time I find a way to vote for him he goes off with this type of stuff......

Granted he's not a professional politician but for God's sake
he needs to be a whole lot smarter then this....

I have no idea what his end game is....
Hillary can be beaten....
That is if the opponent really wants to....

I give up.

There is no end game.
 
I honestly don't think he was making threats. He was saying that those who believe in 2nd amendment rights would come out and vote for him.

But he has no filter. He's tone deaf. He doesn't understand that what he says can be misconstrued, even if he didn't mean it.

He's going to get crushed in November.
Oh, I suspect he was really wondering if someone would shoot Hillary. Making abstract connections like Hillary may so energize the gun vote isn't really something he does off the cuff. Mexican rapists .... grrrr. The woman wasn't allowed to talk ... grrrr.

I doubt he'd really intentionally incite violence. But I think Ivanka and Manafort are holed up somewhere doing vodka shots right now. LOL
 
I honestly don't think he was making threats. He was saying that those who believe in 2nd amendment rights would come out and vote for him.

But he has no filter. He's tone deaf. He doesn't understand that what he says can be misconstrued, even if he didn't mean it.

He's going to get crushed in November.
that 'get out the 2nd amendment vote' only works if he's not already in a hypothetical where the election is over.
 
on cnn... rep. dunca. hunter basically says we can't look at the actual words trump uses because he's not an english professor or a politician. he's a businessman, so he doesn't know how to articulate what he means.
WTF? Like Welch or Gates or Jobs didn't stand up in front of a thousand people and communicate what the shared goal was going to be?

He has the best words, remember.
 

Forum List

Back
Top