What legal officer called Mar-a-Lago a raid?What legal official has called it an insurrection?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What legal officer called Mar-a-Lago a raid?What legal official has called it an insurrection?
Anyone with ethics and sense calls it a raid.What legal officer called Mar-a-Lago a raid?
Just as anyone with ethics and sense called J6 an insurrection.Anyone with ethics and sense calls it a raid.
Yeah, the ethics of a NAZI.Just as anyone with ethics and sense called J6 an insurrection.
Quit making shir upThe archivist never went to Mar a Lago and no one in the government really knew what Trump was packing and taking home.
When the government found out Trump was retaining highly classified documents in a non-government non-authorized manner, they did the right thing and demanded them back.
The problems for Trump only started after he hid documents from the government and his lawyers that he was legally required to return.
If Trump had merely complied with the subpoena, this never would have happened.
Nothing I said was made up. It’s all in the court records.Quit making shir up
You said the archivist never went to Mar A Lago. That's a lie.Nothing I said was made up. It’s all in the court records.
As if the court records have been released to the public before trail. I wish they were released, than the court cases all would be thrown out.Nothing I said was made up. It’s all in the court records.
This case has already been subject to a lot of litigation and all those records are publicly available.As if the court records have been released to the public before trail. I wish they were released, than the court cases all would be thrown out.
When did the archivist go to Mar a Lago?You said the archivist never went to Mar A Lago. That's a lie.
No, it has not been litigated, not at all. You have been mislead by whatever, whichever, news sources you seek.This case has already been subject to a lot of litigation and all those records are publicly available.
I’m surprised you didn’t know this.
Of course there’s been litigation. Don’t you remember when Trump asked for a special master and Eileen Cannon granted him one despite the fact that there was no basis for it?No, it has not been litigated, not at all. You have been mislead by whatever, whichever, news sources you seek.
Asking for a special master is not litigation.Of course there’s been litigation. Don’t you remember when Trump asked for a special master and Eileen Cannon granted him one despite the fact that there was no basis for it?
Cmon man. Do the reading.
It is litigation because Trump took his demand to court.Asking for a special master is not litigation.
Why do you think there was no basis for a special master
????,It is litigation because Trump took his demand to court.
Cannon didn’t even have jurisdiction to grant Trump’s demand. Cannon was overturned on appeal as Trump’s suit should have been dismissed immediately.
????,
I have no idea what you are talking about.
No big deal. It wasn’t something that I expect everyone to know about.????,
I have no idea what you are talking about.
I spoke of archivists, you replied to my comment on archivists, now you have deflected to the special master?No big deal. It wasn’t something that I expect everyone to know about.
Trump special master overturned by appeals court in Mar-a-Lago documents investigation
An appeals court for the 11th Circuit ruled Thursday to overturn the appointment of a special master in the investigation of documents taken from Trump's Mar-a-Lagoabcnews.go.com
But, maybe you shouldn’t call other people liars when they’re just better informed than you.
You spoke of an archivist visiting Mar a Lago and that never happened.I spoke of archivists, you replied to my comment on archivists, now you have deflected to the special master?
I am not here to convince you.You spoke of an archivist visiting Mar a Lago and that never happened.
The court case about the special master is where we learned the majority of our factual information about this situation.
There’s more to learn from congressional testimony for the DO of NARA.
You’ve provided no substantiation to your allegation that the archivist came to Mar a Lago. It never happened.
The president can take whatever documents he likes, moron.