trump Loses Again

[Siete]

All of your far right wing extremists who believe that the information won't be released ignored my post where I stated that the judge refused to put a stay on it until the appeal.

That means that the information will be released while the appeal is moving through the courts.

So it's a waste of time for that appeal since the judge refused to put a stay on the release.

Sorry but trump loses again.

Read the article at the link below. The fact that there will be no stay is the second paragraph.

Trump loses lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

Who has the information, have you asked yourself that yet? Do you honestly think that the information will be released before the SCOTUS rules on it?

BTW, you do know that Congress has no right to his tax records? Please don't spout oversight, because you obviously don't know what your talking about.

The Congress is entitled to oversight for what the President has done WHILE IN OFFICE. Tax records from decades past do NOT qualify.

That is how this just screwed up. In fact, this judge needs to be standing before the BAR answer questions on why his law license should not be suspended.

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

 

[Clipper]

All of your far right wing extremists who believe that the information won't be released ignored my post where I stated that the judge refused to put a stay on it until the appeal.

That means that the information will be released while the appeal is moving through the courts.

So it's a waste of time for that appeal since the judge refused to put a stay on the release.

Sorry but trump loses again.

Read the article at the link below. The fact that there will be no stay is the second paragraph.

Trump loses lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

And I say that the President with executive privilege can stay until it reaches the supreme court. Just because some dickhead guy/girl/it is in a robe, doesnt mean they are higher than the President. You know equal powers shit.....you sure are a dweeb.

No he can't do that. I don't know where you get that stupid idea. What are you 12?

Or are you another lazy conservative who has never actually read the constitution and didn't bother learning it when you were supposed to in US History class in school.

Read the document. The president has no authority to or executive privilege to put a stay on any federal court judge ruling.

What sort of fantasy alternate world do you live in?

You're in for a very rude awakening.

The judge gave the company 7 days to comply with the order. So like I said, the appeal will be a waste of time. The information will already have been handed over by the time the appeal happens.

You and trump lose again.

The next court up can place a stay, or an injunction or whatever. It takes time for a lower court to enforce it's decision, and that's plenty of time to run to the next level and place a hold on the release until the next court figures it out.

Again, try to understand the process before you blather on about it like a useless twat.

Or in your case, a more useless twat.

Triggered! Boy you cultists are really scared shitless that the truth will come out, aintcha?

The Snowflake rightards are as scared of what's in these documents as Comrade Trump is! You can't make this shit up!

 

[Darkwind]

All of your far right wing extremists who believe that the information won't be released ignored my post where I stated that the judge refused to put a stay on it until the appeal.

That means that the information will be released while the appeal is moving through the courts.

So it's a waste of time for that appeal since the judge refused to put a stay on the release.

Sorry but trump loses again.

Read the article at the link below. The fact that there will be no stay is the second paragraph.

Trump loses lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

Who has the information, have you asked yourself that yet? Do you honestly think that the information will be released before the SCOTUS rules on it?

BTW, you do know that Congress has no right to his tax records? Please don't spout oversight, because you obviously don't know what your talking about.

The Congress is entitled to oversight for what the President has done WHILE IN OFFICE. Tax records from decades past do NOT qualify.

That is how this just screwed up. In fact, this judge needs to be standing before the BAR answer questions on why his law license should not be suspended.

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

 

[Siete]

All of your far right wing extremists who believe that the information won't be released ignored my post where I stated that the judge refused to put a stay on it until the appeal.

That means that the information will be released while the appeal is moving through the courts.

So it's a waste of time for that appeal since the judge refused to put a stay on the release.

Sorry but trump loses again.

Read the article at the link below. The fact that there will be no stay is the second paragraph.

Trump loses lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

Who has the information, have you asked yourself that yet? Do you honestly think that the information will be released before the SCOTUS rules on it?

BTW, you do know that Congress has no right to his tax records? Please don't spout oversight, because you obviously don't know what your talking about.

The Congress is entitled to oversight for what the President has done WHILE IN OFFICE. Tax records from decades past do NOT qualify.

That is how this just screwed up. In fact, this judge needs to be standing before the BAR answer questions on why his law license should not be suspended.

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

 

[Darkwind]

Who has the information, have you asked yourself that yet? Do you honestly think that the information will be released before the SCOTUS rules on it?

BTW, you do know that Congress has no right to his tax records? Please don't spout oversight, because you obviously don't know what your talking about.

The Congress is entitled to oversight for what the President has done WHILE IN OFFICE. Tax records from decades past do NOT qualify.

That is how this just screwed up. In fact, this judge needs to be standing before the BAR answer questions on why his law license should not be suspended.

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

 

[Siete]

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Trump denying every facet of the investigation- what do you call that, tiddly winks ?

 

[bullwinkle]

Another day, another judge.

Tomorrow is another day.

Hey billy...have you seen this?

KARMA ALERT: Trump Appeal Now Goes To Court Headed By Merrick Garland

Shrug. If necessary, DC Circuit will not be the last stop.

I don't believe Garland is a particular schmuck anyway.

Will you believe he is a particular schmuck if he rules in agreement with the lower court rulings?

 

[Clipper]

In essence the only people in jail are over taxes. Having failed to get Trump in the Russian baloney this is now their latest hope.

Hey a lot of people cheat on their taxes, just like Comrade Trump does. The jails are full of them.

 

[bullwinkle]

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Darkwind, have YOU read Mueller's conclusions, or just Barr's coverup? You DO know he and his team are the investigators, not the prosecutors, don't you? Constitutionally, the House is the Prosecutor.

 

[Clipper]

You will NEVER see his finances. Know why? They're none of your fking business. You've been potty-trained to believe they're important. Try and follow along:

Trump elected = butthurt progs.
Trump vindicated & progs exposed = butthurt progs.
Trump's finances must therefore be of some importance = butthurt progs.
Trump is successful = butthurt progs.

Trump deranged. Snowflake Trumptards blame Dems.

 

[bullwinkle]

In essence the only people in jail are over taxes. Having failed to get Trump in the Russian baloney this is now their latest hope.

Hey a lot of people cheat on their taxes, just like Comrade Trump does. The jails are full of them.

Al Capone!

 

[Dana7360]

Trump’s appeal to keep finances away from Democrats goes to court headed by Merrick Garland

Karma.....take that Donnie! You dumb Dick!

That probably means the stay on the release of the documents still isn't imposed.

The last court refused to put a stay on the release pending appeal. The court gave the company 7 days to release the documents.

I don't see the next court imposing any stay on that release pending appeal.

This means that next week those documents will be released.

trump loses big time again.

 

[Siete]

In essence the only people in jail are over taxes. Having failed to get Trump in the Russian baloney this is now their latest hope.

Hey a lot of people cheat on their taxes, just like Comrade Trump does. The jails are full of them.

laundering $$$ for Russians is closer to the facts ---- Trump wont go yo jail until hes out of office

 

[Darkwind]

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Trump denying every facet of the investigation- what do you call that, tiddly winks ?

A man proclaims he is innocent, and you call that a crime?

The investigation when forward without a single hindrance. That has been established. The ONLY authority in this matter is Barr and the Courts.

We'll see what the courts have to say.

 

[Darkwind]

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Darkwind, have YOU read Mueller's conclusions, or just Barr's coverup? You DO know he and his team are the investigators, not the prosecutors, don't you? Constitutionally, the House is the Prosecutor.

There is no coverup, and yes, I have read the report. This is nothing more than sour grapes.

The courts will handle the overreach of congress.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

trump lost again today in court over his financial records. The judge wouldn't even put a stay on it until the appeal can be decided. So those financial records are going to be turned over to the congress.


Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress

It doesn't matter. You fuckwits can have the victories that mean NOTHING. Meanwhile America is prospering well beyond Obama's "New normal"

Losers grasp at superfluous bullshit to claim victory. It's all they got

 

[Siete]

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Trump denying every facet of the investigation- what do you call that, tiddly winks ?

A man proclaims he is innocent, and you call that a crime?

The investigation when forward without a single hindrance. That has been established. The ONLY authority in this matter is Barr and the Courts.

We'll see what the courts have to say.

Trump is a lying sob 24/7/365

fuck what he says

 

[Darkwind]

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Trump denying every facet of the investigation- what do you call that, tiddly winks ?

A man proclaims he is innocent, and you call that a crime?

The investigation when forward without a single hindrance. That has been established. The ONLY authority in this matter is Barr and the Courts.

We'll see what the courts have to say.

Trump is a lying sob 24/7/365

fuck what he says

There it is. I was wondering when I would see it.

I've already covered the aspect of, "I don't like him" as a means of justification for violating Constitution authority.

Even Trump gets the presumption of innocence.

Have a good evening.

 

[Clipper]

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Given that no obstruction has been made, I think the real question here is the sanctity of the Executive. If the Democrats are permitted to use innuendo as a justification for violating the privacy of citizens and force the Executive into a subservient position in government, then we may as well do away with that third of our government.

A just and reasonable cause must be shown (to date, it has not, and a desire to get back at someone you dislike is not a just cause), and there ARE legal definitions of these causes. The Legislative Branch is violating its authority when it seeks to go outside the limits of its oversight.

Trump denying every facet of the investigation- what do you call that, tiddly winks ?

A man proclaims he is innocent, and you call that a crime?

The investigation when forward without a single hindrance. That has been established. The ONLY authority in this matter is Barr and the Courts.

We'll see what the courts have to say.

Trump is a lying sob 24/7/365

fuck what he says

There it is. I was wondering when I would see it.

I've already covered the aspect of, "I don't like him" as a means of justification for violating Constitution authority.

Even Trump gets the presumption of innocence.

Have a good evening.

Meanwhile Trump & his cult want Comey, Hillary, Clapper, Brennan, Strzok, Obama, etc jailed.

Nice try, Ace.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Who has the information, have you asked yourself that yet? Do you honestly think that the information will be released before the SCOTUS rules on it?

BTW, you do know that Congress has no right to his tax records? Please don't spout oversight, because you obviously don't know what your talking about.

The Congress is entitled to oversight for what the President has done WHILE IN OFFICE. Tax records from decades past do NOT qualify.

That is how this just screwed up. In fact, this judge needs to be standing before the BAR answer questions on why his law license should not be suspended.

btw - the House Ways and Means Committee the power to request tax returns from the Treasury Department for review in closed session.

check the law ...

Yes, and Trump has the executive privilege and control of the Treasury Department.

Congress has questionable authority to seek his tax returns for the time he has been in office, but none for when he was private citizen.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a lengthy section that generally protects the confidentiality of tax returns/return information and prohibits their disclosure by government employees. The provision Rep. Neal is using is a specific statutory exception from that disclosure prohibition. That exception says that the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.

So, we will be allowing the SCOTUS to decide on the proper interpretation of that code, won't we?

apparently thats whats needed to beat trumps obstruction attempt ...

Obstruction for what again?