Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats not funny, some Dimocrat will take you seriously and start eating Clorox pods and washing it down with bleach......I've been taking the clorox chewables. They're excellent.
Neither was EnochBesides, the Highlanders is not even Jewish.
Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Thats not funny, some Dimocrat will take you seriously and start eating Clorox pods and washing it down with bleach......I've been taking the clorox chewables. They're excellent.
on second thought, I AM SURE THAT DRINKING CLOROX WILL GIVE YOU PERFECT HEALTH AND IMMORTALITY.
Nothing to see here folks, just move along.
Neither was EnochBesides, the Highlanders is not even Jewish.
Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought that was your whole premise that started the debate.
Well then I don’t know what we are arguing about. We are Trying to open and due to sloppy messaging and poor guidelines and reckless behavior we moved too quickly With poor execution and blew the months of shelter work that sacrificed so many businesses and now the virus is surging again.Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought that was your whole premise that started the debate.
no, that's not how the conversation started.
I think we should open up, with n95 or surgical mask or better rules and let people take care of themselves. Open as much as we can with proper masks indoors, social distance, etc....
bandannas under your nose don't work.
Well then I don’t know what we are arguing about. We are Trying to open and due to sloppy messaging and poor guidelines and reckless behavior we do so too quickly and blew the months of shelter work that sacrificed so many businesses and now the problem is surging again.Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought that was your whole premise that started the debate.
no, that's not how the conversation started.
I think we should open up, with n95 or surgical mask or better rules and let people take care of themselves. Open as much as we can with proper masks indoors, social distance, etc....
bandannas under your nose don't work.
Well that's a lie.No, they don't. Not one single mask people are wearing will protect you from a VIRUS... a VIRUS. All you're doing is filtering out LARGE DUST PARTICLES, period.Masks work. That's the real, non tRumpling, fact.Masks don't do shit. That's a fact.“Older people, vulnerable people are going to die from this virus. That is going to happen despite whatever you do. Because with all our progress as a society, we can’t keep everyone alive.”
Unreal, what a heartless fuck. Why not just reopen everything now?
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. But regardless, Trump is right. We can't keep everyone alive. Death finds you no matter how much you try to avoid it or delay it. Stats show that the old and vulnerable are almost guaranteed to die from the virus.
Heartless? No. Realistic? Brutally so.
That doesn't mean that there aren't many things one can do to not spread it. Things Trump dismisses. It's one thing to note that some will die. It's another to advocate for things that will cause more to die.
His dismissals do not spread the virus, people who don't exercise personal hygiene do.
Trump was clearly anti-mask which is a part of personal hygiene.
Pfizer just announced a $1.75 billion contract with the US government to produce up to 600 million doses of a COVID-19 vaccine by December. It is in the final phase of human trials. His initiative "Operation Warp Speed" was him advocating for an effort to develop and distribute a viable vaccine in unprecedented time.
So, his "advocacy" according to your logic, will save tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of lives.
Pfizer would have jumped on the money train no matter who is president.
A Pfizer spokesman was on the news yesterday and said that if their costs were covered, they would distribute the vaccine free of charge to the public.
Don't be stupid.
Then why did Trump take to wearing one? Is he stupid?
Actually TRUMP was the 1st one to suggest people wear a face covering when Fauci was telling people masks wear harmful. TRUMP suggested people could use a scarf or bandana to cover their mouth and nose while in public, a suggestion Fauci and Birx turned their noses up at.
Revisionist history can be fun, though!
Interesting that you think Trumper is the same as name-calling. You must associate it with something bad. But you were a teabagger, too, so...You’re not a libertarian. You’re a Trumper, through and through.Oh no, a leftist thinks I'm not really a libertarian. I'm going to cry now ...
Sorry, I tried ...
BTW, you also don't know how to capitalize. I said I am NOT a member of the Libertarian Party. I am just libertarian. I know you don't know what that means with your going to government schools and all
And you're a Biden Humper. Did you have anything but name calling? LOL, I crack myself up. Like you have anything but name calling ....
The death rate is not an accurate number. We are testing many more people now than we did when NY was surging... also we are seeing more young people infected now as seniors are more prepared to social distance. But I do agree we are getting better at avoiding and treating the disease.Well then I don’t know what we are arguing about. We are Trying to open and due to sloppy messaging and poor guidelines and reckless behavior we do so too quickly and blew the months of shelter work that sacrificed so many businesses and now the problem is surging again.Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought that was your whole premise that started the debate.
no, that's not how the conversation started.
I think we should open up, with n95 or surgical mask or better rules and let people take care of themselves. Open as much as we can with proper masks indoors, social distance, etc....
bandannas under your nose don't work.
I told you you agreed with me.
but here is where we disagree, we are surging, but only in areas where they never had their "Wave".
bonus is the death rate in these states is 1/5 that of new york.
Yes, I remember when Obama told us that SEAL TEAM 6 killed Osama bin Laden. It was exactly what they wanted us to hear. And I must say, it was pleasant!he is right synth....those guys only told us what they wanted us to hear...and made it as pleasant as possible....
He has no point other than ‘fuck old people’.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
“Older people, vulnerable people are going to die from this virus. That is going to happen despite whatever you do. Because with all our progress as a society, we can’t keep everyone alive.”
Unreal, what a heartless fuck. Why not just reopen everything now?
At least you admit he’s orange. Baby steps.You know, we know the answer to that. Have you considered maybe getting off your lazy ass and looking it up?they are catching more cases due to testing
You care to contribute anything besides "fuh fuh fuh, Orange Man Band and I like tire irons shoved up my ass. fuh fuh fuh"?
The death rate is not an accurate number. We are testing many more people now than we did when NY was surging... also we are seeing more young people infected now as seniors are more prepared to social distance. But I do agree we are getting better at avoiding and treating the disease.Well then I don’t know what we are arguing about. We are Trying to open and due to sloppy messaging and poor guidelines and reckless behavior we do so too quickly and blew the months of shelter work that sacrificed so many businesses and now the problem is surging again.Didn’t this conversation start because you said we needed to be open for business because the shutdown does nothing to prevent the spread and deaths from the virus? It was only to not overwhelm hospitals.Are you trying to draw a distinction between the “spread incident rate” and the spread? Also are you trying to say that social distancing doesn’t effect the death count? I just want to be clearPlease reread what you just wroteReasons for the shut down can be BOTH to reduce the spread of the sickness and to not overwhelm hospitals. Both can be true and work hand in hand. It’s not one or the otherI don’t agree with you. How do you think so many other countries have such a low case/death count right now? It’s not because they hit herd immunity... less people are getting sick and less people are dying.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
1. wrong, it was never to prevent you from getting sick.
2. Correct. the shut down and social distancing is to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed. That's it. it was never intended to prevent you from ever catching it.
See you agree with me and you didn't even know it. I know I know it feels good.
that’s was obviously a major factor I don’t see how you can argue otherwise
You are confused, so you know that the reason we shut down was to not overwhelm the hospitals yet your arguing that its about not getting sick? which is it.
Cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
Other countries have lower death rates due to culture, and draconian governments. we have a culture of anti-authority and individualism in the US. we distrust government and when it starts hurting we have no problem defying such.
I opened up my building in defiance of cuomo. No problems here, why is that? Do you think New york and new jerseys flattening of the curve has anything to do with say masks, social distancing, etc?
why does FL have nearly the same number of cases but 1/5 the deaths?
Ask questions my friend, you are being lied to about this virus.
True, however the point was to not overwhelm the hospitals and yes reduce the spread does this. reduce the incident rate, not reduce the spread so you don't get it.
I did whats up, reduce the spread incident rate to not overwhelm the hospitals.
Social distancing and even n95 or better masks do work if done correctly, here in NYC and NJ people are ignoring social distancing rules and are using bandannas or at best surgical masks under thier noses.
Yet no spike, btw.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I thought that was your whole premise that started the debate.
no, that's not how the conversation started.
I think we should open up, with n95 or surgical mask or better rules and let people take care of themselves. Open as much as we can with proper masks indoors, social distance, etc....
bandannas under your nose don't work.
I told you you agreed with me.
but here is where we disagree, we are surging, but only in areas where they never had their "Wave".
bonus is the death rate in these states is 1/5 that of new york.
Interesting that you think Trumper is the same as name-calling. You must associate it with something bad. But you were a teabagger, too, so...You’re not a libertarian. You’re a Trumper, through and through.Oh no, a leftist thinks I'm not really a libertarian. I'm going to cry now ...
Sorry, I tried ...
BTW, you also don't know how to capitalize. I said I am NOT a member of the Libertarian Party. I am just libertarian. I know you don't know what that means with your going to government schools and all
And you're a Biden Humper. Did you have anything but name calling? LOL, I crack myself up. Like you have anything but name calling ....
Nope. Biden is irrelevant. I would vote for a turnip over Trump.
Ok, show us an instance of RW media finding credible evidence of Obama keeping something horrible from the American public.trump is a big mouthed dipshit....but the previous 2 guys sugar coated as much as they were able to themselves....its what politicians do.....some are just better at it than others....are you seriously trying to dismiss how Trump avoided being straight about a deadly virus by pointing at Bush and Obama.... like that somehow makes it ok?!he is right synth....those guys only told us what they wanted us to hear...and made it as pleasant as possible....Yeah, I know.Obama did it for 8 years, Bush did it for 8 years, not sure what the fuck you're talking about.Why was he ever sugar-coating facts? Is that a president’s job?Wow, this surprises me, Frank.“Older people, vulnerable people are going to die from this virus. That is going to happen despite whatever you do. Because with all our progress as a society, we can’t keep everyone alive.”
Unreal, what a heartless fuck. Why not just reopen everything now?
Trump was just speaking what the stats are bearing out. Yeah, he's rough around the edges for a politician.
But he's no longer sugar coating the facts.
He has no point other than ‘fuck old people’.So less people get sick, hospitals don’t get overwhelmed and less people die... I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to makeTo social distance and slow the spreadIs that what you think the other countries did? You know the ones who have no more deaths. Got everybody infected and killed it through herd immunity??It's true tho....
We should re-open everything now, where masks inside, protect the at risk.
We were never supposed to NOT get it, we were supposed to flatten the curve. Ride the wave to herd immunity n shit.
Stay safe.
what a horrible idea you’ve been fed
What was the purpose for shutting down?
Correct, but why?
why do we need to slow the spread?
