The Derp
Gold Member
- Apr 12, 2017
- 9,620
- 661
I am defending their right to free exercise only for contracted services.
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnd, here we have a fifth re-definition of parameters. I mean at this point, it's just expected that you're going to move the goalposts from post to post. The contracted services they offer are through their public business, aren't they? So....you keep trying to make this distinction about point of sale, but that's unchanged if the bakery is a public accommodation. Doesn't matter if it's contractual or not. A receipt is a contract.
if they put a "gays not wanted" sign in front of their point of sale bakery I would not defend them at all..
Unless they claimed it was a religious exercise, right? Then you'd defend them.
that would be a PA violation. And your insults just show how weak your argument is. I was much angrier in the past, hell even a few weeks ago. Things recently in life have shown me the best way to handle useless people like you is to just let you vent, and counter your bullshit with reality
So marty, I see what you're trying to do here. You're trying to avoid the big holes I poked in everything you said. I get why. You're a coward.
Argumentum ad absurdum, equating limits on government to no laws whatsoever.
But that's exactly what you did when you invoked Dred Scott to counter my appeal to authority while basing your entire argument around an appeal to an invisible authority when it comes to whom and why you're baking a cake.
And the thing is if you recognize that hypocrisy in your own argument, but still making the argument, I'm not sure that's any better than simply not recognizing the hypocrisy at all.