You fucking idiot Trumpbot I was posting that the dems have a lot left to prove.Yeah, Trumpbot, that's why I used "if." JFCLogan Act - WikipediaSorry, show me the part where they're not allowed to talk to Russians.
Show us where they're identified as "Russian Intelligence"
It depends on what was discussed. The NYT reports at least 3 people in the Trump campaign had contacts with Russian intelligence during the campaign. If the sanctions of Russia were discussed with any mention of Trump being favorably disposed ... we have a felony Houston. Then the question is whether the communications are directly connected to Trump. If so .... we have an impeachable offense.
There's that word again "IF", assumptions and speculation is all regressives have, hint, that might be enough for you, not for the rest of us.
Like I said earlier, you regressives are long on accusation and really short on proof.
Yet you keep pushing the "ifs", I guess you have a problem with consistency.