Trump - not even sworn in and yet covered in scandal.

[BlindBoo]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

 

[kaz]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

Yup, and McConnell will trade it if the Dems give him a free hand on matters economic. He could care less about SCOTUS.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

@==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==> @==>

A whole box of safety pins for all the hurt Progs in this thread

 

[jc456]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Erm... theses "scandals" are just lawsuits that many of his businesses have.

Thanks for proving again, that you have no clue how business works. You are only worsening your butthurt.

So business works with a lot of lawsuits? Remind me never to do business with you.

they do. you own one? If not, you'll never know. It is what is special about lefty losers, they don't understand business and why food stamp programs exceed so well under their platform.

 

[hadit]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

Something that Harry Reid would have been wise to consider when he went nuclear.

 

[jc456]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

It's like we elected Hillary, huh Deanie Baby?

Trump has 75 lawsuits now. I bet Hillary hasn't had that many in her entire life.

she didn't do anything in 30 years, doesn't surprise me at all. Although she is good at getting people dead.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Not as serious as clinton's sacrificing America's security via improper use of emails either by her stupidity, or for more nefarious reasons.

I'm not even sure what this drama queen shit means anymore

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

 

[kaz]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Not as serious as clinton's sacrificing America's security via improper use of emails either by her stupidity, or for more nefarious reasons.

I'm not even sure what this drama queen shit means anymore

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies. You need to turn down the music in the kommunist klown kar so you can hear the radio

 

[ClosedCaption]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Not as serious as clinton's sacrificing America's security via improper use of emails either by her stupidity, or for more nefarious reasons.

I'm not even sure what this drama queen shit means anymore

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False! Ask someone to put your dunce cap back on.

Now I know you're going to either prove me wrong by linking the quote or prove me right when you come back with Zero but more names to call

Annnnd go!

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

Something that Harry Reid would have been wise to consider when he went nuclear.

They didn't change the cloture rule for SC nominees or for legislation. Only lower level judicial nominees.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'll give you some time to find a new picture to use from Google Images instead of the link that shows Comey said that. Because I know you dont have that link. I'm Psychic

 

[kaz]

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

That was the initial vote on Obamacare which they rushed through before Scott Brown was seated. But the House and Senate passed different versions. The Senate ended up voting the House bill through as is and they changed the rules to get the final bill through without a filibuster. If you don't know history, I'm going to quickly tire of explaining it to you.

Now Republicans have no reason to not just change the rules for SC justices. You can hope Republicans will stop themselves if you like, good luck with that. It's certainly a Hail Mary for you

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'll give you some time to find a new picture to use from Google Images instead of the link that shows Comey said that. Because I know you dont have that link. I'm Psychic

Come on Kaz. Maybe you can mention clowns again, that would be original. But what you cant do is provide any proof that Comey said what you claim.

Better warm up the google images bruh

 

[kaz]

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

Something that Harry Reid would have been wise to consider when he went nuclear.

They didn't change the cloture rule for SC nominees or for legislation. Only lower level judicial nominees.

Yes, they did that too. Again, yes, currently they can filibuster SC nominees. But as you keep pointing out, the Democrats changed the rules where it fit them. Now Republicans have zero reason not to do the same. No way any Republicans allow Democrats to block Republicans from refilling the Supreme Court.

Democrats were stupid. Republican dominated courts were still liberal for decades because Republicans knuckled under and nominated leftists to get them through the Senate. Now you left Republicans with zero reason not to end your ability to do that and put whoever they want on the SC

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Not as serious as clinton's sacrificing America's security via improper use of emails either by her stupidity, or for more nefarious reasons.

I'm not even sure what this drama queen shit means anymore

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False! Ask someone to put your dunce cap back on.

Now I know you're going to either prove me wrong by linking the quote or prove me right when you come back with Zero but more names to call

Annnnd go!

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

 

[kaz]

I'll give you some time to find a new picture to use from Google Images instead of the link that shows Comey said that. Because I know you dont have that link. I'm Psychic

Come on Kaz. Maybe you can mention clowns again, that would be original. But what you cant do is provide any proof that Comey said what you claim.

Better warm up the google images bruh

Lol, you don't get the Klown references, of course you don't. Just Google Comey's statement. I don't have to do that for you

 

[ClosedCaption]

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False!