Trump - not even sworn in and yet covered in scandal.

[BlindBoo]

.....and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

Where did he say that?

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm not even sure what this drama queen shit means anymore

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False! Ask someone to put your dunce cap back on.

Now I know you're going to either prove me wrong by linking the quote or prove me right when you come back with Zero but more names to call

Annnnd go!

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Do you know what possible means? Here I'll make it easy for you.

Possible means:

a. Could happen

or

b. Did happen

Even you can pass this one Kaz

 

[BlindBoo]

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

Something that Harry Reid would have been wise to consider when he went nuclear.

They didn't change the cloture rule for SC nominees or for legislation. Only lower level judicial nominees.

Yes, they did that too. Again, yes, currently they can filibuster SC nominees. But as you keep pointing out, the Democrats changed the rules where it fit them. Now Republicans have zero reason not to do the same. No way any Republicans allow Democrats to block Republicans from refilling the Supreme Court.

Democrats were stupid. Republican dominated courts were still liberal for decades because Republicans knuckled under and nominated leftists. Now you left Republicans with zero reason not to end your ability to do that and put whoever they want on the SC

Obama noted that in the few decades before he took office, about 20 nominees were filibustered. Since he took office, close to 30 judicial and political nominees have had their nominations blocked.o get them through the Senate.

Still a few democrats voted against the change and it is likely a few republicans will not want the Groper Elect to have that power unchecked, so good luck with that change.

 

[Avatar4321]

Lawsuits yes. scandals... Not so much.

Btw If you cared so much about scandals, why did you vote for the queen of corruption? Why did you reelect Obama?

 

[jc456]

And yet he's still your president and gets to pick the next SC Justice.

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

 

[boilermaker55]

We have a bigot and a racist that some people voted for to put in office.
Not me.
Funny that comes from those who voted for the pair of ass wipes, T/P trump pence.

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Hey way to show your patriotism there, guy.

Show me where he is wrong???

People need to put away their bigotry and racism and unite for the good of the country. Donald Trump is the president. Period.

 

[jc456]

We have a bigot and a racist that some people voted for to put in office.
Not me.
Funny that comes from those who voted for the pair of ass wipes, T/P trump pence.

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Hey way to show your patriotism there, guy.

Show me where he is wrong???

People need to put away their bigotry and racism and unite for the good of the country. Donald Trump is the president. Period.

who's the bigot and who's the racist?

 

[boilermaker55]

'the donald" and you!

We have a bigot and a racist that some people voted for to put in office.
Not me.
Funny that comes from those who voted for the pair of ass wipes, T/P trump pence.

Trump managed to make one scandal go away. His Trump U civil suit for Fraud and Racketeering for a mere $25,000,000.00.

And he already paid one IRS fine for the Trump Foundation.

But he is still under several investigations. There is the Florida Attorney General bribery case. Then there is running an uncertified and illegal charity Foundation. For that, he already received a "cease and desist" order. Even if it was an illegal foundation, he still can't spend money from the charity, which he stopped giving to in 2008, but got plenty of "OPM" (other people's money).

How 75 pending lawsuits could distract a Donald Trump presidency

If elected, the open lawsuits will tag along with Trump. He would not be entitled to immunity, and could be required to give depositions or even testify in open court. That could chew up time and expose a litany of uncomfortable private and business dealings to the public.

--------------------------------
75 pending lawsuits. Oops, 74 now.

See ya in court!

Hey way to show your patriotism there, guy.

Show me where he is wrong???

People need to put away their bigotry and racism and unite for the good of the country. Donald Trump is the president. Period.

who's the bigot and who's the racist?

 

[BlindBoo]

Oh he can nominate one but the Senate still needs 60 votes to confirm one. Since America's choice in 2012 was ignored combined with the popular vote, the Dems need to hold firm and deny the Groper's choice.

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

Senator Knoe Wun that's who.

 

[kaz]

It's exactly what Comey said even in saying he didn't think she should be indicted. No drama, queen. Another lap around the kommunist klown kar for you!

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False! Ask someone to put your dunce cap back on.

Now I know you're going to either prove me wrong by linking the quote or prove me right when you come back with Zero but more names to call

Annnnd go!

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Do you know what possible means? Here I'll make it easy for you.

Possible means:

a. Could happen

or

b. Did happen

Even you can pass this one Kaz

Try reading what I said again, moron. You didn't contradict me. She "exposed" our secrets. We don't know if they got them or not. Seriously, you consider this defending her, klown? Back to the track for you for another lap in the kommunist klown kar!

 

[jc456]

'the donald" and you!

We have a bigot and a racist that some people voted for to put in office.
Not me.
Funny that comes from those who voted for the pair of ass wipes, T/P trump pence.

Hey way to show your patriotism there, guy.

Show me where he is wrong???

People need to put away their bigotry and racism and unite for the good of the country. Donald Trump is the president. Period.

who's the bigot and who's the racist?

post up how he is a bigot and me a racist. let's go bubba, you make a claim back it up.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Now you're claiming Comey said something as cover for what Comey never said. Double Troll Points

Comey said she was careless and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

False! Ask someone to put your dunce cap back on.

Now I know you're going to either prove me wrong by linking the quote or prove me right when you come back with Zero but more names to call

Annnnd go!

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Do you know what possible means? Here I'll make it easy for you.

Possible means:

a. Could happen

or

b. Did happen

Even you can pass this one Kaz

Try reading what I said again, moron. You didn't contradict me. She "exposed" our secrets. We don't know if they got them or not. Seriously, you consider this defending her, klown? Back to the track for you for another lap in the kommunist klown kar!

I'll ask you again:

Possible means:

a. Could happen

or

b. Did happen

 

[kaz]

.....and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

Where did he say that?

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Here you go, idiot. There were also lots of other references to it:

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

 

[ClosedCaption]

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked

Kaz be like: This means she WAS successfully hacked!

 

[kaz]

That's easy enough for Republicans to fix. They could just take a page from Harry Reid's play book and do away with the filibuster for SC picks as well. You know very well they are considering doing it since Reid has opened that door.

Dems only need 3 GOP senators to stop that change to the long standing rules of the Senate. They could do it but what goes around comes around. The GOP will not have all three branches forever.

Something that Harry Reid would have been wise to consider when he went nuclear.

They didn't change the cloture rule for SC nominees or for legislation. Only lower level judicial nominees.

Yes, they did that too. Again, yes, currently they can filibuster SC nominees. But as you keep pointing out, the Democrats changed the rules where it fit them. Now Republicans have zero reason not to do the same. No way any Republicans allow Democrats to block Republicans from refilling the Supreme Court.

Democrats were stupid. Republican dominated courts were still liberal for decades because Republicans knuckled under and nominated leftists. Now you left Republicans with zero reason not to end your ability to do that and put whoever they want on the SC

Obama noted that in the few decades before he took office, about 20 nominees were filibustered. Since he took office, close to 30 judicial and political nominees have had their nominations blocked.o get them through the Senate.

Still a few democrats voted against the change and it is likely a few republicans will not want the Groper Elect to have that power unchecked, so good luck with that change.

Jake isn't in the Senate, sorry man

 

[jc456]

The Constitution only requires 51 for SC confirmation

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

Senator Knoe Wun that's who.

Arlan Spector, who changed to democrat in 2009. Then Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman independents, not one republican voted for the bill.

 

[BlindBoo]

Takes 60 votes for cloture.

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

Senator Knoe Wun that's who.

Arlan Spector, who changed to democrat in 2009. Then Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman independents, not one republican voted for the bill.

So it was Senator Knot Wun?

 

[jc456]

Again, that's just a Senate rule. After Obamacare, the Republicans have zero reason to not change the rule for Supreme Court nominees since Democrats ignored it at their whim for national healthcare

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

Senator Knoe Wun that's who.

Arlan Spector, who changed to democrat in 2009. Then Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman independents, not one republican voted for the bill.

So it was Senator Knot Wun?

It was?

 

[BlindBoo]

.....and exposed our secrets to our enemies.

Where did he say that?

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Here you go, idiot. There were also lots of other references to it:

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Except no where does he state that her actions exposed any secrets to our enemies. Without any evidence he asserted what was possible. That also means that is was possible that no hostile actors gained access to her personal e-mail account.

 

[BlindBoo]

There is no requirement of an up/down vote for confirmation in the Constitution. To stop a change to the long standing filibuster rules the Dems will only need a few GOP senators to vote against it.

Furthermore the ACA got passed because they overcame the 60 vote threshold, not because they ignored it at their whim. Is that willful ignorance or do you actually believe it to be the case?

who was the one republican then that voted for it?

Senator Knoe Wun that's who.

Arlan Spector, who changed to democrat in 2009. Then Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman independents, not one republican voted for the bill.

So it was Senator Knot Wun?

It was?

Twas