Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 70,521
- 35,238
- 2,300
You were fine with it in 2000 right?So you are good with a single person disenfranchising hundreds of thousands based on her opinion?
Remember SOS Harris in Fla??
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You were fine with it in 2000 right?So you are good with a single person disenfranchising hundreds of thousands based on her opinion?
The confederate soldiers that the 14th was specifically written for? They had a congressional act and Presidential decree finding they participated in the Civil War, Simp.I know about Kenneth H. Worthy, William L. Tate, J. D. Watkins, John H. Christy,
……until proven guilty in a court of law, Simp.Same as the assumption of innocent.
“Given the compresed timeframe, the novel constitutional questions involved, the importance of this case, and impending ballot preparation deadlines, I will suspend the effect of my decision until the Superior Court rules on any appeal, or the time to appeal…”
Not even close, Simp.You were fine with it on 2000 right?
Remember SOS Harris in Fla??
NO.Does Donald Trump have every right as an American citizen that you have?
Well, only if you believe in "Innocent until proven guilty," which meaner gene definitely doesn't
If it were a criminal outcome wouldn't Benedict Donald be sentenced or have some from of criminal punishment in store for him in Maine. It's not a criminal outcome so your statement is moot. There is a criminal case for Benedict Donald actions surrounding Jan 6th but this ain't that.ONE PERSON CAN NOT DECIDE A CRIMINAL OUTCOME, stupid commie asswipe.
And yet, he was found innocent under our system. Why do you Dimwinger fascists always want to ignore reality to push you terminal TDS induced delusions, vermin?A majority of the jury (US Senate) found Trump GUILTY.
The courts are the end of the road in this country.Not the issue.
PROVE YOUR ASSERTION.
You can't.
A secretary of state cannot unilaterally decide who voters are permitted to vote for. This is political theater, nothing more.
The confederate soldiers that the 14th was specifically written for? They had a congressional act and Presidential decree finding they participated in the Civil War, Simp.
Does Trump have those against him?
Just tried a couple of different search arguments, I did not find many. Adam Clayton Powell comes to mind (as I started paying more attention to politics at that time, as he was stripped of chairmanship of US House of Representatives Education and labor Committee, by the House Democratic Caucus, then the full House (Democrat controlled) refused to seat him at all. But, like the Tennessee thing recently, his constituents reelected him to be seated. Later, the US Supreme Court ruled against the action of the Democrat controlled House for the actions in the first place. It is of interest that in 1970 he lost reelection basically for the same things, the Democrats kicked him out for, in the first place. Even Harlem could no longer put up with his shit.Have Democrats ever policed their own?
Who cares? Trump is on the ballot.Oh look, ECB turns out to be just yet another enraged idiot who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Yes, Maine's Secretary of State absolutely has that power according to Maine's laws.
Under Maine law, voters can petition the secretary of state with challenges to a candidate's qualifications for office, and then a public hearing is held where the challengers must make their case.
Same as the assumption of innocent.
Never said there was Pooky. Pence is the one who said "“I think it’s important that the American people know what happened in the days before January 6,” Pence said. “President Trump demanded that I use my authority as vice president presiding over the count of the Electoral College to essentially overturn the election by returning or literally rejecting votes. I had no authority to do that.”You stupid fucktard, NOT ONE electoral vote was thrown out.
You people are such whiny little assholes, get a fucking life.
In what way do you MAGAt morons imagine Trump's due process rights were violated?Due process dew smocess, read my last post, MAGA man
A majority of the jury (US Senate) found Trump GUILTY.
No one has expanded the definition of insurrection and rebellion against the Constitution. Demanding the VP unilaterally throw out certified EC votes of several states in order to change the election results meets the standard without question.