Trump Removed from Maine Primary Ballot

Found innocent in that impeachment, Simp.

Why hasn’t he been charged with rebellion?
It takes 66 Senators to convict. A majority of the Senate found him guilty.
 
Why hasn’t he been charged with rebellion?

You have convicted Biden with no evidence, yet you watched a president try overturning an election and ask stupid questions.
 
Not sure about the Maine hack’s ruling, but the CO ruling instructs the SOS to throw out any write in votes for Trump, Simp.

Obvious disenfranchisement
Doesn't stop the voters ability to write in a name does it? Say that could be a CT of the future for you Faux Hounds. Trump got more write in votes than Biden so he's the real El Presidente!
 
Doesn't stop the voters ability to write in a name does it? Say that could be a CT of the future for you Faux Hounds. Trump got more write in votes than Biden so he's the real El Presidente!
Holy shit you are stupid. If the write in vote gets thrown out simply for it being for Trump the voter is disenfranchised.
 
That is an assumption by a Dimtard, not a criminal charge, Moron.

Next?
That was one of the questions presented in the challenge that she had to answer.

"In sum,the text, history, and context of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment make clear that it covers the President, and that it is a qualification enforceable by the states.

3. The record demonstrates that the events of January 6, 2021 were an insurrection, The parties do not meaningfully dispute the events of January 6, 2021. Multiple ‘government reports that the Rosen Challengers entered into evidence confirm that a large group of people violently attacked the Capitol with the intent of preventing the certification of the presidential election. This resulted in a lock down of the Capitol complex, an evacuation of the Vice President and congressional leaders, an interruption of official House and Senate proceedings, and multiple deaths and injuries. As described in a United States Government

Accountability Report: 'Over the course of about 7 hours, more than 2,000 protestors entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, disrupting the peaceful transfer of power and threatening the safety of the Vice President and members of Congress. The attack resulted in assaults on at least 174 police officers, including 114 Capitol Police and 60 D.C. Metropolitan Police Department officers. These events led to at least seven deaths and caused about $2.7 billion in estimated costs.'"
 
That was one of the questions presented in the challenge that she had to answer.

"In sum,the text, history, and context of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment make clear that it covers the President, and that it is a qualification enforceable by the states.

3. The record demonstrates that the events of January 6, 2021 were an insurrection, The parties do not meaningfully dispute the events of January 6, 2021. Multiple ‘government reports that the Rosen Challengers entered into evidence confirm that a large group of people violently attacked the Capitol with the intent of preventing the certification of the presidential election. This resulted in a lock down of the Capitol complex, an evacuation of the Vice President and congressional leaders, an interruption of official House and Senate proceedings, and multiple deaths and injuries. As described in a United States Government

Accountability Report: 'Over the course of about 7 hours, more than 2,000 protestors entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, disrupting the peaceful transfer of power and threatening the safety of the Vice President and members of Congress. The attack resulted in assaults on at least 174 police officers, including 114 Capitol Police and 60 D.C. Metropolitan Police Department officers. These events led to at least seven deaths and caused about $2.7 billion in estimated costs.'"
Once again, nothing more than the opinion of a single Dimtard.
 
Holy shit you are stupid. If the write in vote gets thrown out simply for it being for Trump the voter is disenfranchised.
No that means the voter would be stupid for voting for an unqualified candidate. The is no law against that kind of stupid however.
 
No that means the voter would be stupid for voting for an unqualified candidate. The is no law against that kind of stupid however.
No stupid, what you describe is textbook disenfranchisement.
 
No stupid, what you describe is textbook disenfranchisement.
Benedict Donald disenfranchised himself by trying to overturn the valid election of 2020. The electorate can still vote for Mickey Mouse if they want to.
 
As opposed to your Orange Fuhrer who tried to overturn the Will of the People after the 2020 election?
You absolutely CAN NOT PROVE it was the will of the People.

You're spouting bullshit. Prove your assertion
 

Forum List

Back
Top