Trump Removed from Maine Primary Ballot

[Nostra]

That still doesn't state Congress has sole authority, Dumbfuck. For example, a state can’t impeach a president because the Constitution grants the House, "sole" authority to do that.

So anyone can kick someone off a ballot then. Are you ever not a Dumbfuck? Ever?

 

[Delldude]

LOL

There's a shit ton of evidence. Didn't you see any of the videos played in the Congressional hearings?

Ah ha..................so why were there no charges of insurrection by Trump?

 

[Faun]

Actually it's too bad for CO.

 

[Nostra]

Her unilateral interpretation of that

Nope. The actual law, Dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

LOL

There's a shit ton of evidence. Didn't you see any of the videos played in the Congressional hearings?

Piglosi’s Hollywood produced shit show?

 

[Nostra]

Because it doesn't say they have sole power. This isn't rocket science, Dumbfuck. Even a dumbfuck like you should be able to understand

They are the only entity listed, Moron. Sounds like sole power to me.

 

[OKTexas]

Nope. The Constitution doesn't state Congress has sole power. Just says they have the power to enforce it with legislation. That's optional on their part and not limited to just them.

What the hell are you snorting?? Of course it says congress has the sole power to enforce it by appropriate legislation. The xiiden regime just reiterated that the States have no power to enforce federal law.

.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dimocarts, doing everything they can to NOT ALLOW American voters to do the choosing for their next president.

 

[Faun]

So anyone can kick someone off a ballot then. Are you ever not a Dumbfuck? Ever?

No, Dumbfuck. Depends on the states' laws who is granted that authority

 

[Delldude]

This is the Maine SOS and her views on voters and voting"

 

[Faun]

Ah ha..................so why were there no charges of insurrection by Trump?

Because they're not needed to keep him out of office.

 

[OKTexas]

Can't be accused of insurrection without evidence.

You can be accused of anything without evidence, an accusation of itself is not evidence.

.

 

[Faun]

Piglosi’s Hollywood produced shit show?

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, it included video of insurrection.

 

[Delldude]

Depends on the states' laws who is granted that authority

Fed law exceeds that authority.......Dumbfuck

 

[Delldude]

You can be accused of anything without evidence, an accusation of itself is not evidence.

.

Yet you have a right to defend yourself against such claims in a court of law.

 

[OKTexas]

no, the ruling from the SOS of Maine.

did none of you bother to even look at it?

Yeah, it's garbage and beyond their authority.

.

 

[Nostra]

What the hell are you snorting?? Of course it says congress has the sole power to enforce it by appropriate legislation. The xiiden regime just reiterated that the States have no power to enforce federal law.

.

If only one entity is listed as having the authority to enforce something it has sole power to enforce it.

Pretty simple stuff, but too difficult for some here.

 

[Delldude]

Dumbfuck, it included video of insurrection.

Of course the J6 clowns made referrals to DOJ for prosecution......why no prosecution for insurrection?

 

[Faun]

They are the only entity listed, Moron. Sounds like sole power to me.

Dumbfuck, there's precedence showing you're a dumbfuck. Here's a case where the Judicial branch of NC banned someone from public office. Exactly like Colorado did. Congress was not involved...

Worthy v. Barrett and Others, 63 N.C. 199 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read Worthy v. Barrett and Others, 63 N.C. 199, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No, it is EXPLICITLY Stated as a condition and carries no weight of criminality.

The 14th Amendment explicitly states that no citizen's liberty can be abridged. This means that due process is required and that means a conviction by a court of law.

Wrong.

Being disqualified from holding public office pursuant to Section 3 is not a criminal offence subject to prosecution, being disqualified doesn’t jeopardize one’s life, liberty, or property – consequently, due process doesn’t apply.