Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,690
- 57,383
- 3,615
Do you really think you are helping your case by showing the hack relied solely on the Piglosi Hollywood Shit Show?She never said that. Not only do you cherry pick, but you also lie about what was said so you can completely misconstrue the meaning of what she stated in her findings. But that's just how the Neo-GOP hivemind works.
"I am not bound by either the federal or Maine rules of evidence because this is an APA proceeding. However, the four factors outlined above provide a useful framework for assessing the trustworthiness of the January 6 Report. The first three factors plainly counsel in favor of admissibility. Mr. Trump's objections focus primarily on the fourth factor, namely the motivation of the authors. But all Congressional reports are to some degree political, and many of the facts contained in the Report are corroborated by other documentary and video evidence in the record. 1 accordingly see no reason to exclude the January 6 Report in its entirety under § MRS. §9057(2). That said, Mr. Trump's concerns are valid insofar as the Report reflects a curated view of the evidence and contains characterizations of that evidence. These limitations influence the weight that I assign to the Report."
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)