Trump Removed from Maine Primary Ballot

Pulling for Biden.gif
 
What did y'all think was gonna happen when y'all lied about massive election fraud to steal an election y'all lost, then stormed the Capitol in a second revolution to steal the election you lost because your first scheme failed to steal the election?

No one believes "Jan 6th" anymore but the fascists but keep talking
 
I didn't see any felony charges for insurrection....only speculation....care to explain?

Based on the history of the use of this part of the 14th being used to bar people from running, none are necessary.
 
It's snowballing. There will be more states disqualifying him. It's also a kick in the butt at SCOTUS, telling them they can't slow-walk this.



Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, making it the second state in the country to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office.

The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state, and the Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. The nation’s high court could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again.
More proof you are dumber than you look…
 
Clearly jeopardizes Trump’s liberty, Simp.


Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.[1]



In the Constitutional law of the United States, Ordered liberty means creating a balanced society where individuals have the freedom to act without unnecessary interference (negative liberty) and access to opportunities and resources to pursue their goals (positive liberty), all within a fair legal system.

Sometimes liberty is differentiated from freedom by using the word "freedom" primarily, if not exclusively, to mean the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; and using the word "liberty" to mean the absence of arbitrary restraints, taking into account the rights of all involved. In this sense, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others. Thus liberty entails the responsible use of freedom under the rule of law without depriving anyone else of their freedom. Liberty can be taken away as a form of punishment. In many countries, people can be deprived of their liberty if they are convicted of criminal acts.
At least you’re consistent at being ignorant and wrong – you are the typical conservative.

‘The report from the CRS specified, "Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."’


In fact, disqualification pursuant to Section 3 is a political – not criminal – process; absent jeopardy of loss of freedom by state action, due process does not apply and is not required to disqualify a candidate from holding public office.
 
This ISN’T a criminal action.
Correct.

If someone is disqualified from holding public office pursuant to Section 3, he doesn’t go to jail, he isn’t executed, and his private property isn’t taken by the state – he goes home and finds something else to do.

There is no requirement for due process, no requirement for a criminal conviction.
 
At least you’re consistent at being ignorant and wrong – you are the typical conservative.

‘The report from the CRS specified, "Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."’


In fact, disqualification pursuant to Section 3 is a political – not criminal – process; absent jeopardy of loss of freedom by state action, due process does not apply and is not required to disqualify a candidate from holding public office.

At least you’re consistent in your typical leftist ignorance. The entirety of your cutting and pasting presumes guilt for some insurrection™ you presume took place.

However, no typically ignorant leftist has made any case for their silly insurrection™ conspiracy theories under 18 U.S.C. § 2383.

I’ll lend an assist to the typically ignorant leftist. 18 U.S.C. § 2383 is a part of what we call a legal code.
 
It's snowballing. There will be more states disqualifying him. It's also a kick in the butt at SCOTUS, telling them they can't slow-walk this.



Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, making it the second state in the country to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office.

The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state, and the Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. The nation’s high court could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again.
Fascists gotta fascist.
 
Correct.

If someone is disqualified from holding public office pursuant to Section 3, he doesn’t go to jail, he isn’t executed, and his private property isn’t taken by the state – he goes home and finds something else to do.

There is no requirement for due process, no requirement for a criminal conviction.
Biden just got disqualified for being on the ballot in 27 States for not upholding his sworn duties.
 
Aint’t it great when the Dems / Dolts do what they do?


Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows unilaterally ruled that former President Donald Trump is unqualified to appear on the 2024 primary ballot despite lacking a law degree and substituting YouTube videos for due process.

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said Thursday on Anderson Cooper 360 that Bellows’ decision to bar Trump from the ballot was based on “YouTube clips, news reports” and “things that would never pass the bar in normal court.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top