Trump says to cancel order to new Airforce 1 for him.. Too much money.

[aris2chat]

Let's see. Trump has not taken office and he has......

Given up his salary (something a democrat would never do, especially a Bernie Sanders.)

Has saved jobs and company is not leaving the country and taking advantage of cheap labor

Has not allowed a big corporation to fleece the American taxpayer.

The left claim the republicans are the ones on the side of big banks, big corporate dollars and wall street.

Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation.......

Good God. Don't you just wish all liberals would just die?

Carrier, a ball bearing plant and now perhaps Ford.............and he won't be prez for 6 weeks

 

[Kosh]

Only twits tweet.

Says the far left drone losers!

Pizzagate code

Yes you are a far left drone!

Push that debunked far left religious dogma!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, lets go down the list, shall we?

1. There is no "contract" for AF1 for Trump to "cancel". It's in the earliest, beginning stages.

2. The President doesn't have the power to unilaterally "cancel" anything, that power lies with Congress.

3. The only reason for this tweet was the fact that the CEO of Boeing had the audacity to publicly criticize Trump. This is "revenge".

4. Boeing is an American company, that employs thousands of Americans. Trump's tweet already cost Boeing investors nearly half a billion dollars - how many American jobs is he sacrificing to his own ego's desire for revenge?

 

[bodecea]

Only twits tweet.

Says the far left drone losers!

Pizzagate code

Yes you are a far left drone!

Push that debunked far left religious dogma!

Pizzagate?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

how many American jobs is he sacrificing to his own ego's desire for revenge?

You mean they were only staying in business to build these two planes?

 

[Flash]

Well, lets go down the list, shall we?

1. There is no "contract" for AF1 for Trump to "cancel". It's in the earliest, beginning stages.

2. The President doesn't have the power to unilaterally "cancel" anything, that power lies with Congress.

3. The only reason for this tweet was the fact that the CEO of Boeing had the audacity to publicly criticize Trump. This is "revenge".

4. Boeing is an American company, that employs thousands of Americans. Trump's tweet already cost Boeing investors nearly half a billion dollars - how many American jobs is he sacrificing to his own ego's desire for revenge?

Lets do another list

1. Trump don't want the damn airplane

2. The US can't afford $4 billion for an airplane

3. Trump doesn't play by the same rules as all the other politicians

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump Tweets to 'Cancel Order' for New Air Force One Plane Go ahead libs find something negative about this. He is trying to save Americans money.

This is not only abut the contract for Air Force One. The Air Force has signed a number of contracts with Boeing that leave the final cost open ended and experience shows the final cost is always many times higher than the estimates. Trump promised to eliminate wasteful spending and he is starting with this issue. Unlike Obama and Clinton, Trump has much experience negotiating large contracts and Boeing is being put on notice that if it does not cooperate in keeping costs down, they will lose these contracts. 45 days before being inaugurated, 13 days before the electoral college votes, Trump has already begun keeping the promises he made during the campaign.

Exactly. And even if it goes nowhere, it's good to know this is his mindset. It will give those Congress critters something to think about when they prepare a budget. You don't have to be President to go to Open Secrets and see all the ridiculous spending that goes on in this country.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, lets go down the list, shall we?

1. There is no "contract" for AF1 for Trump to "cancel". It's in the earliest, beginning stages.

2. The President doesn't have the power to unilaterally "cancel" anything, that power lies with Congress.

3. The only reason for this tweet was the fact that the CEO of Boeing had the audacity to publicly criticize Trump. This is "revenge".

4. Boeing is an American company, that employs thousands of Americans. Trump's tweet already cost Boeing investors nearly half a billion dollars - how many American jobs is he sacrificing to his own ego's desire for revenge?

Lets do another list

1. Trump don't want the damn airplane

2. The US can't afford $4 billion for an airplane

3. Trump doesn't play by the same rules as all the other politicians

Ok.

1. Trump won't see the new planes either way. The new planed won't enter service until 2022 at the earilest, and most likely later.

2. Of course we can.

3. Only because Trump doesn't understand the rules.

 

[Kosh]

Only twits tweet.

Says the far left drone losers!

Pizzagate code

Yes you are a far left drone!

Push that debunked far left religious dogma!

Pizzagate?

More far left religious dogma, from a far left drone, that voted for Hilary!

 

[ABikerSailor]

Do you Trump supporters REALLY think that he can get by using his own plane?

 

[bodecea]

Only twits tweet.

Says the far left drone losers!

Pizzagate code

Yes you are a far left drone!

Push that debunked far left religious dogma!

Pizzagate?

More far left religious dogma, from a far left drone, that voted for Hilary!

More Pizzagate code.

 

[Flash]

[

2. Of course we can.

How can we afford another flying castle when we are $20 trillion in debt?

If we can send our Air Force pilots up in 70 year old B-52s why can't we get a little more usage out of the existing AF1?

Of course that jackass Obama used the one a lot flying all over the country on filthy ass Democrat fundraisers and sending his family off to Africa and other places on vacations, didn't he?

 

[Kosh]

Says the far left drone losers!

Pizzagate code

Yes you are a far left drone!

Push that debunked far left religious dogma!

Pizzagate?

More far left religious dogma, from a far left drone, that voted for Hilary!

More Pizzagate code.

Yes we know you far left drones are sore losers!

 

[Flash]

When Donald Trump says something is too extravagant, it's probably too extravaganthttps://t.co/zyCrC02Z6T

David Burge (@iowahawkblog) December 6, 2016

 

[Flash]

As heard on Rush, Boeing may be getting its weenie wacked for being so heavily in bed with the Clintons and their crime family foundation, and all the lobbying they did to try to sell planes to Iran (which Iran decided on Airbus).

 

[Flash]

Let's put this in perspective. Four billion dollars is more than the GDP of the following nations: Eritrea, Cayman Islands, Andorra, Curaçao, Guyana, Maldives, Burundi, Aruba, Greenland, Liberia, Lesotho, Bhutan, Cape Verde, San Marino, Central African Republic, Belize, Djibouti, Seychelles, Saint Lucia, Somalia, Zanzibar, Antigua and Barbuda, Guinea-Bissau, Solomon Islands, Sint Maarten, British Virgin Islands, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, The Gambia, Samoa, Vanuatu, Turks and Caicos Islands, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Comoros, Dominica, Tonga, São Tomé and Príncipe, Federated States of Micronesia, Cook Islands, Anguilla, Palau, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Kiribati, Montserrat, and Tuvalu.

 

[idb]

He'll be angling to lease his own plane to the office of President.
Very clever.

 

[Serioususername]

[

2. Of course we can.

How can we afford another flying castle when we are $20 trillion in debt?

If we can send our Air Force pilots up in 70 year old B-52s why can't we get a little more usage out of the existing AF1?

Because AF-1 flies a fuckton more then those B-52's, and isn't built in the same damned way as those freaking B-52's. You're comparing a super advanced civilian aircraft modification to a relatively simple and rugged bomber. Besides the B-52 is the damned exception to the rule, not the rule.

 

[miketx]

Trump sold his shares in Boeing in June. You scum want a link, you search for it.

 

[Flash]

[

2. Of course we can.

How can we afford another flying castle when we are $20 trillion in debt?

If we can send our Air Force pilots up in 70 year old B-52s why can't we get a little more usage out of the existing AF1?

Because AF-1 flies a fuckton more then those B-52's, and isn't built in the same damned way as those freaking B-52's. You're comparing a super advanced civilian aircraft modification to a relatively simple and rugged bomber. Besides the B-52 is the damned exception to the rule, not the rule.

Sorry but you are confused.

AF1 is a friggin taxi. The B-52s are used in war. The B-52s are used more rigorously. There is difference.

When we can get ourselves out from some of the enormous debt that Obama accrued then we can think about having nice things. Until then forget about any new $4 billion flying castles.

If that asshole Obama didn't fly around the country so much to filthy Democrat fundraisers, golf games, stupid campaign speeches and using AF1 to send his fat ass ho wife on vacation maybe the airplane wouldn't have so many air miles on it.