Trump - Sinking Like a Stone

[rat pack]

You think doesn't cut it.

English?

 

[AntonToo]

Trump's followers feel STUPID for voting for him.

They are turning on him because he has betrayed them and they feel dumb for getting tricked by a common huckster

Clearly you didn't read this this thread - these people are not capable of feeling dumb it seems.

 

[rat pack]

Trump's followers feel STUPID for voting for him.

They are turning on him because he has betrayed them and they feel dumb for getting tricked by a common huckster

Clearly you didn't read this this thread - these people are not capable of feeling dumb it seems.

They aren't even able to admit they made a mistake by voting for Trump. Trump promised them the world, and he's incapable of doing even a fraction of what he promised. It will be years before they admit that Donald hasn't made America great again, that he hasn't created more jobs than any other president, that he hasn't made mexico pay for the wall, that he hasn't drained the swamp, that he hasn't paid off the national debt, that he hasn't balanced the budget.

 

[AntonToo]

The same Polls that gave Hillary Clinton a 90% chance to be President. LOL.

You have a link to where Gallup or any other national polling "that gave Hillary Clinton a 90% chance to be President." ?

Of course you don't because it is made up bullshit by a pathetic dummy - you.

Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

Clinton has 90% chance of beating Trump in race for White House, according to poll

HuffPost Forecasts Hillary Clinton Will Win With 323 Electoral Votes | The Huffington Post

Are those POLLS? No they are not. They are ANALYSIS of the polls.

National polls ONLY reflected popular vote, not Electoral College count.

As NY said, the person ahead by 2% wins 90% of the time, take it up with him.

Idiot, there is NOT A SINGLE THING that NY can say that would make those national polls show electoral college outcome. They, by definition, do not measure that, the ONLY thing they measure is a national vote outcome, which they did quite well.

 

[Iceweasel]

You think doesn't cut it.

English?

Learn it.

 

[Iceweasel]

They aren't even able to admit they made a mistake by voting for Trump.

Your miserable sniveling asses proves it was the right call.

 

[rat pack]

You think doesn't cut it.

English?

Learn it.

What dialect is "you think doesn't cut it"

 

[Iceweasel]

The same Polls that gave Hillary Clinton a 90% chance to be President. LOL.

You have a link to where Gallup or any other national polling "that gave Hillary Clinton a 90% chance to be President." ?

Of course you don't because it is made up bullshit by a pathetic dummy - you.

Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

Clinton has 90% chance of beating Trump in race for White House, according to poll

HuffPost Forecasts Hillary Clinton Will Win With 323 Electoral Votes | The Huffington Post

Are those POLLS? No they are not. They are ANALYSIS of the polls.

National polls ONLY reflected popular vote, not Electoral College count.

As NY said, the person ahead by 2% wins 90% of the time, take it up with him.

Idiot, there is NOT A SINGLE THING that NY can say that would make those national polls show electoral college outcome. They, by definition, do not measure that.

Yet we had predictions and people here claiming it was impossible for Trump to win electorally. Nice to know you admit it was bullshit.

 

[Iceweasel]

You think doesn't cut it.

English?

Learn it.

What dialect is "you think doesn't cut it"

Holy fuck, you're retarded. You said "I think" and I said you think doesn't cut it.

Go back to your coloring books, junior.

 

[AntonToo]

You have a link to where Gallup or any other national polling "that gave Hillary Clinton a 90% chance to be President." ?

Of course you don't because it is made up bullshit by a pathetic dummy - you.

Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning: Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation

Clinton has 90% chance of beating Trump in race for White House, according to poll

HuffPost Forecasts Hillary Clinton Will Win With 323 Electoral Votes | The Huffington Post

Are those POLLS? No they are not. They are ANALYSIS of the polls.

National polls ONLY reflected popular vote, not Electoral College count.

As NY said, the person ahead by 2% wins 90% of the time, take it up with him.

Idiot, there is NOT A SINGLE THING that NY can say that would make those national polls show electoral college outcome. They, by definition, do not measure that.

Yet we had predictions and people here claiming it was impossible for Trump to win electorally. Nice to know you admit it was bullshit.

But that has NOTHING to do with national polls that this thread at least tangentially touches.

 

[rat pack]

They aren't even able to admit they made a mistake by voting for Trump.

Your miserable sniveling asses proves it was the right call.

Trump is incapable of following the law. He spent too much time with too many of his lawyers who convinced him they could win any legal battle he got into. But like the Trump University lawsuit, Donald wrote a check his ass couldn't cash, so instead he settled for a $26 million payout to make it go away.

Trump still faces constitutional challenges of his ownership of a government rental building, and his ownership of businesses that receive foreign payments.

 

[rat pack]

Holy fuck, you're retarded. You said "I think" and I said you think doesn't cut it.

Go back to your coloring books, junior.

Don't they have punctuation where you come from ????????

 

[Markle]

LOL, libtards are still trying to use polls after they have been proven wrong.

Here's an example of how widely these polls vary. From the latest polls and average at Real Clear Politics

Polling Data
Poll
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Date . . Sample . . Approve . . Disapprove . . Spread
RCP Average . . . . .1/27 - 2/12 . . -- . . . . . . . 44.3 . . . . . . 49.9 . . . . . . -5.6
Rasmussen Reports 2/8 - 2/12 . 1500 LV . . . 52 . . . . . . .. .48. . . . . . . . .4
Gallup . . . . . . . . . . . .2/9 - 2/11 . 1500 A . . . .40 . . . . . . . . 55 . . . . . . . .-15

In the Sample column are the number sampled. LV stands for Likely Voter, A stands for Adult

LV is a much more reliable and more difficult to sample. A means they reached anyone over 18, not as reliable.

This is why Vlad_hombre petitioned so hard to get me banned from a tiny, far left Progressive forum from Pensacola Florida. I would always point out the lies in the progressives posts. They now seldom have more than 10-12 posters at any one time. Actually, there is usually one poster and 8-10 "visitors" who are just looking at the threads.

Keep up the good work Vlad!

 

[peabody]

Trump's followers feel STUPID for voting for him.

They are turning on him because he has betrayed them and they feel dumb for getting tricked by a common huckster

Have you got anything else? You pop in, jerk off then leave.

I think my comment had merit. It's not true however, because apparently you're too stupid to realize how stupid you are.

 

[rat pack]

Here's an example of how widely these polls vary. From the latest polls and average at Real Clear Politics
Rasmussen Reports 2/8 - 2/12 . 1500 LV . . . 52 . . . . . . .. .48. . . . . . . . .4
Keep up the good work Vlad!

Rasmussen is a historical right leaning poll. They add 5 points in the republicans favor.

Rasmussen had Mitt Romney over Obama in 2012 and McCain over Obama in 2008

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just like we denied them before the elections.

The raw poll were right. Hillary by 3 million votes. What was in error was how to weight the voting (electoral college) power of each voter.

That was not within the scope of what polls do. That is where the Trumptards are lying.

Besides, there is no electoral college involved in approval polls. They are 'popular vote' polls, in effect.

Even in the popular vote, as told by the election, each vote has to be weighed against its electoral college power to get a determination of how the poll would reflect an election. Trump could have 0% approval in NY and CA, and it wouldn't effect his electability.

So the polls haven't caught up to reflecting election chances.

This is ALL about the Trump supporters inventing a crutch to lean on when they deny polls they don't like.
It's nothing new btw, the Right has been a hotbed of poll denialism long before this past election.

It's a conservative thing.

More rectal facts from Rye. The polls were wrong all along, that's the fact. How you feel about it is a matter of your own opinion.

So you're taking the position that President Obama's approval never really fell below 50%,

despite what the polls might have said.

Very, very interesting.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Ouch ...

Searching the internet for a poll that fits what you would like it to say. Now let's check into some reality.

‘I’m Still All Trumped Up’

It’s a completely different view of Trump’s early performance than you’d get in any coastal city, or even 75 miles away in the urban center of Indianapolis—where thousands of women descended on the statehouse on the same Saturday afternoon when the Ameses were preparing for their “T” Party. And, it’s a more accurate measure of his popularity, too. If Trump is going to lose momentum, he’s going to have to lose it in places like Vigo first. And as far as Vigo is concerned, Trump is delivering the goods.

 

[Markle]

They aren't even able to admit they made a mistake by voting for Trump.

Your miserable sniveling asses proves it was the right call.

Trump is incapable of following the law. He spent too much time with too many of his lawyers who convinced him they could win any legal battle he got into. But like the Trump University lawsuit, Donald wrote a check his ass couldn't cash, so instead he settled for a $26 million payout to make it go away.

Trump still faces constitutional challenges of his ownership of a government rental building, and his ownership of businesses that receive foreign payments.

LIE, please point out where there is any mention, whatsoever, of a president owning property. George Washington, perhaps you know the name, was one of the richest men in America when he became the first president. You know, just like President Donald Trump.

Curious is it not? How Progressives, unlike most of America, consider success a BAD THING. Who really want to follow the losers known as Progressives?

 

[rat pack]

Reality is a hard mistress. Especially after being divorced from reality for so long.

 

[rat pack]

LIE, please point out where there is any mention, whatsoever, of a president owning property. George Washington, perhaps you know the name, was one of the richest men in America when he became the first president. You know, just like President Donald Trump.

Curious is it not? How Progressives, unlike most of America, consider success a BAD THING. Who really want to follow the losers known as Progressives?

There is nothing wrong with the president owning property, or making money from his property, as long as it's in the USA. The founding fathers wanted to make sure the president wasn't influenced by foreign powers, so they forbid the president from taking any emoluments from foreigners. It's in the constitution, and lawsuits have already been filed that you'll be reading about as they work their way up to the supreme court.