Trump Supporters - Don't his comments about women bother you?

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

I have grandson & a grand daughter. A President has always been looked upon as a icon of honor, respect and dignity, to all races, to all religions, and to both genders, until the Tea Party extreme and Reich wing Evangelicals invaded the Republican party in 2009/2010. They certainly are responsible for nominating man with no honor, no respect, no dignity, completely stuffed with misogyny, bigotry and ignorance. The most incompetent, unqualified DANGEROUS candidate in this nation's history, Donald Trump.

The real issue is most of us are raising girls & boys. Certainly we don't want our sons and grandson's growing up making comments like that about women, much less sexually assaulting them. We don't want our daughters and grand daughters, living an watching a President who continually degrades them with offensive sexist remarks that can scar them for the rest of their lives, with self esteem issues that instills in their brains that they're not worth much, making an entire gender (women) under achievers.

THIS IS THE REAL ISSUE WITH TRUMP. It's not just girls, it's boys too. It's hard enough to raise good kids in this country, that have good decent character--without installing a sexual vile foul mouthed predator in the Oval Office, that they'll be forced to listen too for the next 4 years.

Furthermore any woman that supports Trump today--has serious self-esteem issues of herself, as we have seen in some of these pictures coming out of Trump rallies. These women can be very cady and are jealous of Hillary Clinton. Because they don't deserve anything themselves, she doesn't either. Then you have the mid to elderly Evangelical woman that were raised in church that believe that if even her husband is a child serial killer, she is supposed to stand by him, no matter what, and underneath his thumb for the rest of her life. These women wouldn't vote for any woman, even if she was a Republican. These are the women who would vote for Trump.

But the GOOD news is--Trump has an unfavorable rating with the largest voting block in this country (women) at 73%, and half of Women in the Republican party won't cast a vote for him, and this was PRIOR to the audio tape coming out. So I imagine it's worse now.
73 percent of women voters have an 'unfavorable' view of Donald Trump
Poll: Nearly half of Republican women wouldn't vote for Trump

They were warned about Trump on many occasions and they ignored it all.
#NeverTrump: We Told You He Would Kill Us, but You Didn’t Listen

So BURN THIS BARN DOWN TO THE GROUND by voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yet that you support someone who attacks the women assaulted by her sexual predator husband shows what a standard women are not for you

Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS--his name is not on any ballot in this country. Furthermore, Bill Clinton never attacked an entire gender with vile, offensive comments, Trump is a repeat offender well known for doing that.

So you think just attacking victims of sexual assault isn't attacking all women? Of course it is, no one chose to be assaulted. That means every woman could have been the one she attacked. You are one sick little fuck

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

I would have liked to seen another option on your survey. For many of us, voting for the orange clown is not done in support of him, but rather as a rejection of the most vile and despicable person to ever be a major party nominee. The orange clown is a horrible canidate, the pantsuit bulldyke makes him look like Abe Lincoln.

Actually I covered that option: "I still support Trump, but yes, they bother me"

Slightly different Kazman, I don't support him. He is the only viable alternative to the bulldyke.

Fair enough, but "support" him just meant you will vote for him. There's only so much granularity I can get to. That you will vote for him but you don't support him is too granular. That's what I meant, you're going to vote for him

I get that, but I would have rather selected "voting for" than "supporting". "Support" connotes more enthusiasm, "voting for" is a choice.

Fair enough, that would have been a better way to phrase it. That is what I meant though

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

I have grandson & a grand daughter. A President has always been looked upon as a icon of honor, respect and dignity, to all races, to all religions, and to both genders, until the Tea Party extreme and Reich wing Evangelicals invaded the Republican party in 2009/2010. They certainly are responsible for nominating man with no honor, no respect, no dignity, completely stuffed with misogyny, bigotry and ignorance. The most incompetent, unqualified DANGEROUS candidate in this nation's history, Donald Trump.

The real issue is most of us are raising girls & boys. Certainly we don't want our sons and grandson's growing up making comments like that about women, much less sexually assaulting them. We don't want our daughters and grand daughters, living an watching a President who continually degrades them with offensive sexist remarks that can scar them for the rest of their lives, with self esteem issues that instills in their brains that they're not worth much, making an entire gender (women) under achievers.

THIS IS THE REAL ISSUE WITH TRUMP. It's not just girls, it's boys too. It's hard enough to raise good kids in this country, that have good decent character--without installing a sexual vile foul mouthed predator in the Oval Office, that they'll be forced to listen too for the next 4 years.

Furthermore any woman that supports Trump today--has serious self-esteem issues of herself, as we have seen in some of these pictures coming out of Trump rallies. These women can be very cady and are jealous of Hillary Clinton. Because they don't deserve anything themselves, she doesn't either. Then you have the mid to elderly Evangelical woman that were raised in church that believe that if even her husband is a child serial killer, she is supposed to stand by him, no matter what, and underneath his thumb for the rest of her life. These women wouldn't vote for any woman, even if she was a Republican. These are the women who would vote for Trump.

But the GOOD news is--Trump has an unfavorable rating with the largest voting block in this country (women) at 73%, and half of Women in the Republican party won't cast a vote for him, and this was PRIOR to the audio tape coming out. So I imagine it's worse now.
73 percent of women voters have an 'unfavorable' view of Donald Trump
Poll: Nearly half of Republican women wouldn't vote for Trump

They were warned about Trump on many occasions and they ignored it all.
#NeverTrump: We Told You He Would Kill Us, but You Didn’t Listen

So BURN THIS BARN DOWN TO THE GROUND by voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yet that you support someone who attacks the women assaulted by her sexual predator husband shows what a standard women are not for you

Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS--his name is not on any ballot in this country. Furthermore, Bill Clinton never attacked an entire gender with vile, offensive comments, Trump is a repeat offender well known for doing that.

Wtf? So in your world Oreo bill gets to go back to the white house as a cleaning lady
God Damn moron its open season again on 18 year old interns that are wearing POTUS knee pads you sick fucker...

Again you're comparing apples to oranges.

1. Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS. Trump is.
2. Bill Clinton never has been on record for making vile offensive comments about women.
Trump is a frequent flyer on vile, foul mouthed, offensive comments regarding women, including public radio where he knew people were listening.

This Clinton/Trump comparison isn't working for you.

1. Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS. Trump is

- My point wasn't about Slick. Try reading it again

you support someone who attacks the women assaulted by her sexual predator husband

Can you hear me now?

2. Bill Clinton never has been on record for making vile offensive comments about women

He assaults them, he doesn't make vile comments. Wow, he's a gentleman, thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't thought of it that way before.

You are one sick little fuck

 

[Theowl32]

I don't give a shit. The only ones that care less than me are the lying losers on the left who are the very types that gleefully voted for ted Kennedy every year after fucking killing a woman.

Every last pathetic left wing lying hypocritical piece of shit gasbag can all go fuck themselves.

No, just to make it clear, I don't give a shit what he said.

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." On the other hand, if you're arguing he hasn't made any vile comments about women, well, I'm not interested a game of no it isn't

 

[Norman]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic thing that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

 

[kaz]

You know that Trump lies probably 5 times more than Hillary ever could

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

Nah. But then... That's because I listen to what he says for myself. Rather than have some mouthpiece tell me what he said, and what it means... We righties have this nasty habit of doing our own thinking...

And you haven't seen the clips of him saying it himself? And again note from my OP, "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." But if you're saying he's said nothing repulsive about women, well, you're beyond help.

That reminds me of a question I always wondered. Does the cave you live in have a street address?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know that Trump lies probably 5 times more than Hillary ever could

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic things that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

Why would a libertarian or a pro capitalist vote for Trump? He's anti-capitalist. I didn't vote for him for that reason.

And again I'm not interested in debating Trump's disgusting statements about women to a guy who just wants to say no it isn't.

And Republicans have done nothing for my freedom. And someone who thinks he should have the power to decide what capitalism I can engage in isn't going to do any different. Frankly I can't stand Gary Johnson, he's not really a libertarian. But he's better than Trump and Hillary

 

[Vastator]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

Nah. But then... That's because I listen to what he says for myself. Rather than have some mouthpiece tell me what he said, and what it means... We righties have this nasty habit of doing our own thinking...

And you haven't seen the clips of him saying it himself? And again note from my OP, "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." But if you're saying he's said nothing repulsive about women, well, you're beyond help.

That reminds me of a question I always wondered. Does the cave you live in have a street address?

Hell, I've said worse myself... Likely you have too. The difference is that I'm not a hypocrite.

 

[paulitician]

Clinton Supporters - Don't all Clinton's rapes bother you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Clinton Supporters - Don't all Clinton's rapes bother you?

May I respond as they would?

"Duh.....nope.....nope.....not a bit...."

 

[Norman]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic things that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

Why would a libertarian or a pro capitalist vote for Trump? He's anti-capitalist. I didn't vote for him for that reason.

And again I'm not interested in debating Trump's disgusting statements about women to a guy who just wants to say no it isn't

Bullshit. Capitalism doesn't mean importing a bunch of people who want your freedoms destroyed. That's so called "utopian libertarianism" (no serious libertarian believes in that sort of nonsense). As for free trade, there is no free trade, and excise taxes are arguably more capitalistic than income taxes.

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

Nah. But then... That's because I listen to what he says for myself. Rather than have some mouthpiece tell me what he said, and what it means... We righties have this nasty habit of doing our own thinking...

And you haven't seen the clips of him saying it himself? And again note from my OP, "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." But if you're saying he's said nothing repulsive about women, well, you're beyond help.

That reminds me of a question I always wondered. Does the cave you live in have a street address?

Hell, I've said worse myself... Likely you have too. The difference is that I'm not a hypocrite.

What did I say that was hypocritical?

 

[kaz]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic things that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

Why would a libertarian or a pro capitalist vote for Trump? He's anti-capitalist. I didn't vote for him for that reason.

And again I'm not interested in debating Trump's disgusting statements about women to a guy who just wants to say no it isn't

Bullshit. Capitalism doesn't mean importing a bunch of people who want your freedoms destroyed. That's so called "utopian libertarianism" (no serious libertarian believes in that sort of nonsense).

I never said it did, I'm strongly in favor of a wall and really securing the borders. If Trump was a capitalist, this is one of the reasons I'd have voted for him

As for free trade, there is no free trade, and excise taxes are arguably more capitalistic than income taxes.

I haven't heard Trump say he's eliminating income taxes, you have a link?

As for free trade, the argument that other countries don't necessarily give us free trade so our government can restrict it even more is frankly pretty inane. I'm not voting for someone who is threatening Ford with $3,500 tariffs and Carrier with $1,500 tariffs. It's clearly anti capitalist. I reject out of hand the idea government is going to restrict my freedom for my own good. And that he demands I prove to him it's in his interest to allow me to have free trade is an abomination to capitalism.

BTW, I have spent my career in multinationals. This spring I finished a 9 month stint in the Netherlands working for the Dutch subsidiary of a US corporation.

Capitalists do not ask government to fix the problem. Capitalists get government to stay the fuck out of it, which is a far more effective way to fix the problem. Government doesn't fix shit

 

[Alexandra]

Whether what he said bothers you or not, this is funny:

 

[Norman]

WHICH misogynistic things has he stated?

Is him being automatically attracted to beautiful women as every man, somehow misogynistic?

You need to be a bit more careful about your use of words. He called particular women idiots, that's not misogynistic, any more than me calling you clueless is a misandrist statement. Of course, the natural inclination for men to go full white knight is what we are witnessing here. "Said something bad about a particular woman -> therefore made statements regarding all of them". Ironically, this function is entirely and purely designed so that we could grab some more pussy.

I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic things that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

Why would a libertarian or a pro capitalist vote for Trump? He's anti-capitalist. I didn't vote for him for that reason.

And again I'm not interested in debating Trump's disgusting statements about women to a guy who just wants to say no it isn't

Bullshit. Capitalism doesn't mean importing a bunch of people who want your freedoms destroyed. That's so called "utopian libertarianism" (no serious libertarian believes in that sort of nonsense).

I never said it did, I'm strongly in favor of a wall and really securing the borders. If Trump was a capitalist, this is one of the reasons I'd have voted for him

As for free trade, there is no free trade, and excise taxes are arguably more capitalistic than income taxes.

I haven't heard Trump say he's eliminating income taxes, you have a link?

As for free trade, the argument that other countries don't necessarily give us free trade so our government can restrict it even more is frankly pretty inane. I'm not voting for someone who is threatening Ford with $3,500 tariffs and Carrier with $1,500 tariffs. It's clearly anti capitalist. I reject out of hand the idea government is going to restrict my freedom for my own good. And that he demands I prove to him it's in his interest to allow me to have free trade is an abomination to capitalism.

BTW, I have spent my career in multinationals. This spring I finished a 9 month stint in the Netherlands working for the Dutch subsidiary of a US corporation.

Capitalists do not ask government to fix the problem. Capitalists get government to stay the fuck out of it, which is a far more effective way to fix the problem. Government doesn't fix shit

Well, obviously if you enact excise tax, you won't need as high income tax. Since he talks about spending and tax cuts, you can do the math...

He's certainly pro-capitalism, realistically...

 

[Tom Horn]

He attracts the same kind of voter....Misogynist men and women with no self-esteem. (not saying that covers all his supporters....but he attracts those while Clinton does not)

How about misandrist (men-haters) women like yourself....a lesbian with no self-esteem? You're obviously not attractive to men. There isn't a Clinton supporting lib "male" here who doesn't hate women. Need proof? Look at any post about Sarah Palin or Melania Trump, or the Fox News babes. Vile, vicious, with a fantasy desire to physically harm or humiliate women they see as having no possible interest in them. Hillary obviously despises women she can't have sex with, making her more "misogynistic" than any conservative man. Michelle Obama despises all white women. Face it, your kind is so self-loathing that all your attacks are nothing more than projecting your own hatred of yourself and those like you.

 

[Vastator]

First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

Nah. But then... That's because I listen to what he says for myself. Rather than have some mouthpiece tell me what he said, and what it means... We righties have this nasty habit of doing our own thinking...

And you haven't seen the clips of him saying it himself? And again note from my OP, "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." But if you're saying he's said nothing repulsive about women, well, you're beyond help.

That reminds me of a question I always wondered. Does the cave you live in have a street address?

Hell, I've said worse myself... Likely you have too. The difference is that I'm not a hypocrite.

What did I say that was hypocritical?

Take your pick. I don't know you in the "real" world. But these folks feigning shock, and dismay at things trump has said; are phony, and as hypocritical as they come...

He hasn't used language that I, and most people don't use nearly every day. Whether it be "bad" words, or statements that if taken literally would constitute a crime. Its all phony bullshit.