Trump Supporters - Don't his comments about women bother you?

Do Trump's comments about women bother you even if they don't change your mind?

  • I don't support Trump and nothing he said about women either way would change that

  • I still support Trump, but yes, they bother me

  • I support Trump, and no, they don't bother me


Results are only viewable after voting.
He attracts the same kind of voter....Misogynist men and women with no self-esteem. (not saying that covers all his supporters....but he attracts those while Clinton does not)

How about misandrist (men-haters) women like yourself....a lesbian with NO self-esteem? There isn't a Clinton supporting lib "male" here who doesn't hate women. Need proof? Look at any post about Sarah Palin or Melania Trump, or the Fox News babes. Vile, vicious, with an fantasy desire to physically harm or humiliate women they see as having no possible interest in them. Hillary obviously despises women she can't have sex with, making her more "misogynistic" than any conservative man. Michelle Obama despises all white women. Face it, your kind is so self-loathing that all your attacks are nothing more than projecting your own hatred of yourself and those like you.
You really hit the nail on the head with this post. It should be made a sticky. Seriously....
 
Well, apparently there are a whole lot of us. I mean almost all of law enforcement and the military support Trump and not Hillary. Even the Secret Service hate her.

Again, looking at WHY they support him is telling.

You have the hard core deplorables, racists and misogynists. And yes, we find a lot of those in the military and law enforcement, unfortunately.

Then you have the people who KNOW Trump is a bad idea, but just can't bring themselves to vote for Hillary. and this is the problem, they've put partisanship above the good of the country. and yes, it's sad we have that type in the military and law enforcement.

Finally, you have the fools who think that once Trump is in office, they can control him. These people need to look up a guy named "Franz von Papen" to see how well that sort of thinking works out. (Spoiler alert, not well)

While you su[port a woman who violated the law by using and unsecure server to conduct government business. An unsecured server who was probably hacked by at least five foreign governments. A woman who left four men to die without lifting a hand to aid them, who claimed to have dodged sniper fire in Bosnia, and who took money from foreign governments while serving as Secretary of State. Wr know full well what you support.
 
try to put all the sexual stuff on the back burner and look at policy. A little problem I have with the trump presidency, the thought of having a first lady with naked sexual pictures representing our country
 
First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person


I have grandson & a grand daughter. A President has always been looked upon as a icon of honor, respect and dignity, to all races, to all religions, and to both genders, until the Tea Party extreme and Reich wing Evangelicals invaded the Republican party in 2009/2010. They certainly are responsible for nominating man with no honor, no respect, no dignity, completely stuffed with misogyny, bigotry and ignorance. The most incompetent, unqualified DANGEROUS candidate in this nation's history, Donald Trump.

The real issue is most of us are raising girls & boys. Certainly we don't want our sons and grandson's growing up making comments like that about women, much less sexually assaulting them. We don't want our daughters and grand daughters, living an watching a President who continually degrades them with offensive sexist remarks that can scar them for the rest of their lives, with self esteem issues that instills in their brains that they're not worth much, making an entire gender (women) under achievers.

THIS IS THE REAL ISSUE WITH TRUMP. It's not just girls, it's boys too. It's hard enough to raise good kids in this country, that have good decent character--without installing a sexual vile foul mouthed predator in the Oval Office, that they'll be forced to listen too for the next 4 years.

Furthermore any woman that supports Trump today--has serious self-esteem issues of herself, as we have seen in some of these pictures coming out of Trump rallies. These women can be very cady and are jealous of Hillary Clinton. Because they don't deserve anything themselves, she doesn't either. Then you have the mid to elderly Evangelical woman that were raised in church that believe that if even her husband is a child serial killer, she is supposed to stand by him, no matter what, and underneath his thumb for the rest of her life. These women wouldn't vote for any woman, even if she was a Republican. These are the women who would vote for Trump.

But the GOOD news is--Trump has an unfavorable rating with the largest voting block in this country (women) at 73%, and half of Women in the Republican party won't cast a vote for him, and this was PRIOR to the audio tape coming out. So I imagine it's worse now.
73 percent of women voters have an 'unfavorable' view of Donald Trump
Poll: Nearly half of Republican women wouldn't vote for Trump

They were warned about Trump on many occasions and they ignored it all.
#NeverTrump: We Told You He Would Kill Us, but You Didn’t Listen

So BURN THIS BARN DOWN TO THE GROUND by voting for Hillary Clinton.

tea-party-cartoon.jpg




Yet that you support someone who attacks the women assaulted by her sexual predator husband shows what a standard women are not for you


Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS--his name is not on any ballot in this country. Furthermore, Bill Clinton never attacked an entire gender with vile, offensive comments, Trump is a repeat offender well known for doing that.

So you think just attacking victims of sexual assault isn't attacking all women? Of course it is, no one chose to be assaulted. That means every woman could have been the one she attacked. You are one sick little fuck

Still perpetuating the same lie I see...

Trump: Clinton vicious with those who charged abuse by Bill
 
First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

I am the father of 5 girls, no, they don't bother me.

Does Hillary's cover up and defense of not one but two sexual offenders bother you? Her husband and Anyhony Weiner, the latter she knew was sexting women since 2011.
 
I addressed this in the OP. "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"

You said that he makes misogynistic remarks on a regular basis. That is FALSE. In fact, can you even point to a single misogynistic things that he has said?

Libertarians, pro-capitalists should vote for Trump. Remember if she wins, you can kiss good bye to all your freedoms. Activists judges, importation of socialists etc... Change your vote while you still can.

Why would a libertarian or a pro capitalist vote for Trump? He's anti-capitalist. I didn't vote for him for that reason.

And again I'm not interested in debating Trump's disgusting statements about women to a guy who just wants to say no it isn't

Bullshit. Capitalism doesn't mean importing a bunch of people who want your freedoms destroyed. That's so called "utopian libertarianism" (no serious libertarian believes in that sort of nonsense).

I never said it did, I'm strongly in favor of a wall and really securing the borders. If Trump was a capitalist, this is one of the reasons I'd have voted for him

As for free trade, there is no free trade, and excise taxes are arguably more capitalistic than income taxes.

I haven't heard Trump say he's eliminating income taxes, you have a link?

As for free trade, the argument that other countries don't necessarily give us free trade so our government can restrict it even more is frankly pretty inane. I'm not voting for someone who is threatening Ford with $3,500 tariffs and Carrier with $1,500 tariffs. It's clearly anti capitalist. I reject out of hand the idea government is going to restrict my freedom for my own good. And that he demands I prove to him it's in his interest to allow me to have free trade is an abomination to capitalism.

BTW, I have spent my career in multinationals. This spring I finished a 9 month stint in the Netherlands working for the Dutch subsidiary of a US corporation.

Capitalists do not ask government to fix the problem. Capitalists get government to stay the fuck out of it, which is a far more effective way to fix the problem. Government doesn't fix shit

Well, obviously if you enact excise tax, you won't need as high income tax. Since he talks about spending and tax cuts, you can do the math...

He's certainly pro-capitalism, realistically...
:wtf:

Yes, government getting too much money and having to cut taxes because they just can't spend it is such a recurring problem.

What color is the sky in your world?
 
First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person
Nah. But then... That's because I listen to what he says for myself. Rather than have some mouthpiece tell me what he said, and what it means... We righties have this nasty habit of doing our own thinking...

And you haven't seen the clips of him saying it himself? And again note from my OP, "I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation." But if you're saying he's said nothing repulsive about women, well, you're beyond help.

That reminds me of a question I always wondered. Does the cave you live in have a street address?
Hell, I've said worse myself... Likely you have too. The difference is that I'm not a hypocrite.

What did I say that was hypocritical?
Take your pick. I don't know you in the "real" world. But these folks feigning shock, and dismay at things trump has said; are phony, and as hypocritical as they come...

He hasn't used language that I, and most people don't use nearly every day. Whether it be "bad" words, or statements that if taken literally would constitute a crime. Its all phony bullshit.

If that's true, you should take serious stock of your life and your attitude to women. One thing I am not is PC, but what you are saying is you're sick
 
First what I am not saying

- I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation
- I am not saying it makes him worse than Hillary
- I am not saying it disqualifies him from being President
- I am not saying he'd say exactly today what he has said in the past

But doesn't it bother you even if you still support him that he would say such outlandishly misogynistic things on such a repeated basis? If I supported his policies, I'd still have voted for him. I voted for Gary Johnson yesterday, but it was because of Trump's anti-capitalism, it had nothing to do with this either way. We're electing a President, not a priest and Hillary's a corrupt, lying politician. But what he has said about women is in my view extremely offensive, and I see no real reason to believe he's a fundamentally different person

I am the father of 5 girls, no, they don't bother me.

Does Hillary's cover up and defense of not one but two sexual offenders bother you? Her husband and Anyhony Weiner, the latter she knew was sexting women since 2011.

"I am not saying he's guilty of every leftist hyperbolic accusation"
 
The person I hang my hat on...?

That's a weasel question if ever there was one. As if Broaddrick is some anomaly? As if I base my assessments on scarce, cherry-picked anecdotes? Um, no. There's no cherry-picking when it comes to the Clintons. If anything you need a really strong umbrella, because It's raining fruit. The women who've accused Bill Clinton are plentiful, and there are disturbingly similar details in the stories of the most credible, Broaddrick among them. Apparently Bill's a biter, and his junk has some unique characteristics (and these women weren't aware of each other's stories).

And it's been almost 20 years since Broaddrick addressed everything on that remarkably rote list of Clintonian smear points.

Uh, yeah. You see, the thing is, you keep claiming that there are all these women, and you still come back to the same three. Brodderick, Willey and Jones. The first two are PROVEN, DOCUMENTED LIARS. Jones is just a gold digger who let herself get used by the right wing.

Brodderick isn't credible because she's changed her story so many times. There's more evidence that the Duke Lacrosse Team raped Crystal Magnum. There's more evidence that the Phi Kappa Fraternity raped "Jane Doe" at the University of Virginia.
 
The person I hang my hat on...?

That's a weasel question if ever there was one. As if Broaddrick is some anomaly? As if I base my assessments on scarce, cherry-picked anecdotes? Um, no. There's no cherry-picking when it comes to the Clintons. If anything you need a really strong umbrella, because It's raining fruit. The women who've accused Bill Clinton are plentiful, and there are disturbingly similar details in the stories of the most credible, Broaddrick among them. Apparently Bill's a biter, and his junk has some unique characteristics (and these women weren't aware of each other's stories).

And it's been almost 20 years since Broaddrick addressed everything on that remarkably rote list of Clintonian smear points.

Uh, yeah. You see, the thing is, you keep claiming that there are all these women, and you still come back to the same three. Brodderick, Willey and Jones. The first two are PROVEN, DOCUMENTED LIARS. Jones is just a gold digger who let herself get used by the right wing.

Brodderick isn't credible because she's changed her story so many times. There's more evidence that the Duke Lacrosse Team raped Crystal Magnum. There's more evidence that the Phi Kappa Fraternity raped "Jane Doe" at the University of Virginia.
Look, another rape enabler democrat.......
 
Actually, you wou;d find many women attending the many churches of this nation who will not vote for Hillary. Many of them are old school Democrats who simply will not vote for her because of her stance on late term abortion and her pledge to repeal the Hyde Act.
Interesting. You base that on..............what exactly?

The fact that there are many Christian women. I know some women in my own church who are Democrats who are not voting for Hillary.

You just said why--they're in your church and have been raised to believe to stand by their men, even if they're child serial killers. That's what I just explained--it's these women that would never vote for any woman, and they're probably elderly Democrat women.

The reason Republican's put up a raining men platform this year, was not so much their fear of Hillary Clinton. They all know her and have worked with her in the past. Many of them have praised her on work she has completed, and actually like her when they're not having to campaign against her. It's not that they're afraid of her, it's that they're scared shitless of the 1st woman POTUS.

All these Reich wing political dog & pony shows (Bengazi/emails) would have never gone that far if Hillary Clinton's name was Henry Clinton. Misogyny is deeply routed within the Republican Party, and yes some males within the Democrat party. There are people in this country that would vote for TRUMP, with full knowledge that he is the most incompetent, unqualified, DANGEROUS, emotionally unstable candidate ever to seek elected office, simply because they can't stand the thought of the 1st woman President of the United States.

Misogyny--(Misogyny (/mɪˈsɒdʒɪni/) is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against women or girls. Misogyny can be manifested in numerous ways, including social exclusion, sex discrimination, hostility, androcentrism, patriarchy, male privilege, belittling of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification.[1][2] Misogyny can occasionally be found within sacred texts of religions and mythologies, and various influential Western philosophers and thinkers have been described as misogynistic.[1][3]
Misogyny - Wikipedia

Here is a great article on this:
Dear Hillary: How Very Dare You! | Huffington Post

Got it.

You have a negative opinion of people who disagree with you.

Other than that, your post is nothing but partisan bile.


The difference between me and you, is that I can deal with the fact that you disagree with me, without having to believe that you are a bad person to justify to myself, my dismissal of your viewpoint.

He's just a Democrat. When a Republican he'd never vote for anyway defiles women, he's outraged. When Democrats he'll vote for anyway defile women, it's no thang


And they have the gall to pretend otherwise, when they have been sooooooooo obvious about it for so long.
 
Trump is terrified of women and has built a following by saying he wants to destroy the US. He's in bed with Assange, Snowden and Putin and has openly stated he wants to destroy the US Constitution.

That's why RWNJs love him.

Luckily, they're too damn dumb to know he can't do a fraction of what he has threatened and he's too damn dumb to know it either.


64684678.jpg
 
It is quite amusing to see some of the democrat voting men on here claim to be disgusted by Trumps locker room talk, whilst they attack Melania in the most misogynistic and sexist manner - using foul language whilst they are at it.


Liberals are complete hypocrites.
 
Bill Clinton is not running for POTUS--his name is not on any ballot in this country. Furthermore, Bill Clinton never attacked an entire gender with vile, offensive comments, Trump is a repeat offender well known for doing that.
Yes, we've all heard the braindead talking point over and over. The point isn't that Bill is running for office, the that has been stated over and over is the left didn't give a shit what he did, let alone said. You leftists have no defense to it so you just chant the party line.

If you have evidence of actual offenses then post them up, are you waiting for Christmas?


AND we are judging HIllary on HER actions in enabling and protecting that piece of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top