Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president

[xyz]

How fucking stupid are you?

Me? You never think about what you post?

 

[bripat9643]

Me? You never think about what you post?

I don't think what you think, but only a fucking retard would think that.

 

[xyz]

I don't think what you think, but only a fucking retard would think that.

So your avatar indicates your real age, it seems.

 

[miketx]

Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.

The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), seeking to have him disqualified from the ballot in the state under the 14th Amendment. The Insurrection Clause of the amendment prohibits those who have "engaged in insurrection" against the United States from holding a civil, military, or elected office without unless a two-thirds majority of the House and Senate approve.

But Trump's lawyers are arguing that the specific language of the Constitution argues that this requirement only applies to people in offices who are bound to "support" the Constitution — and the presidency is not one of those offices.

Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president

Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...

www.rawstory.com

This is totally bizarre! If the President of the United States isn't required to support the Constitution - then who is? What do you think?

Total bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

So your avatar indicates your real age, it seems.

It seems that you're an idiot.

 

[lennypartiv]

Of course it is.
It’s a distinction without a difference. A losers defense.

Is giving aid or comfort to insurrectionists preserving, protecting and defending the constitution?
Of course not. Especially when the insurrectionists were operating at the president’s request and according to his plans.
That is all that matters.

I thought you liberals supported the right to protest.

 

[AntonToo]

Any lie to stop Trump.

Lying? For what?

This con man has no business to be anywhere near the high office an he proves it everyday, no lies needed.

 

[AntonToo]

This shit is why Trump lost in 2020 among crimes committed at the ballot box.

He lost election, got twice impeached and now 4 times indicted because he is a piece of crap.

Yet you'll blame everyone but the man himself.

 

[jc456]

Trump calls for the termination of the Constitution in Truth Social post​

Where?

 

[jc456]

He lost election, got twice impeached and now 4 times indicted because he is a piece of crap.

Yet you'll blame everyone but the man himself.

Your symptoms are tds

 

[Clipper]

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

LIE LIE LIE!

 

[Clipper]

You defend an incestuous pervert. That is indefensible. Try again, blowhole.

Trump as a businessman was an outright crook & as POTUS he was a piece of shit.

End of story.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I thought you liberals supported the right to protest.

Peacefully, yes. But it was not a peaceful protest but a violent riot.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Your symptoms are tds

MAGA is infected by Trump Devotional Syndrome

 

[Lastamender]

Trump as a businessman was an outright crook & as POTUS he was a piece of shit.

End of story.

Wrong again. Ask his new Black supporters. They know what he did. Ask the Hispanics too.

 

[jc456]

LIE LIE LIE!

How?

 

[jc456]

MAGA is infected by Trump Devotional Syndrome

They call you flip right?

 

[Leviticus]

Ok, so firstly, your title is misleading, trump himself didn’t say this, it was his lawyers, just for clarification.

Secondly, where did rawstory get the article, they only link to a tweet by some other lady who has a segment of some text but doesn’t really say where she got it from. Does anyone have a link to the actual full text of the filing document that his lawyers filed?

Also, rawstory is the only one to run this story?

An attorney does not say anything that his client has not approved. In the eyes of the law, a client is responsible for their attorneys, actions, and words.

 

[Robert W]

He lost election, got twice impeached and now 4 times indicted because he is a piece of crap.

Yet you'll blame everyone but the man himself.

I still believe Trump was robbed. The criminals of the DNC enacted clever plots then defended their crimes. Impeaching is a nothing. Forget that. He was not found guilty. And the indictments are failing as well.

I blame the media for working with the Democrats to keep Trump from winning. The media is worse than Russia since they are considered good. But they smell rotten.

 

[Billo_Really]

Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.

The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), seeking to have him disqualified from the ballot in the state under the 14th Amendment. The Insurrection Clause of the amendment prohibits those who have "engaged in insurrection" against the United States from holding a civil, military, or elected office without unless a two-thirds majority of the House and Senate approve.

But Trump's lawyers are arguing that the specific language of the Constitution argues that this requirement only applies to people in offices who are bound to "support" the Constitution — and the presidency is not one of those offices.

Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president

Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...

www.rawstory.com

This is totally bizarre! If the President of the United States isn't required to support the Constitution - then who is? What do you think?

This is too funny!