JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,543
The government has no business in messing with wages. ESPECIALLY capping it.Global companies do not want to live in China or India , they want to live here in the US.
No, I think you are a Birther type, Alex Jones fan from the sound of you.
Agreed.
Whoa. Without government standards we would have silk tongued bastards talking people into indentured servitude contracts all over again. Some people are just that stupid, the lower 30% of the gene pool I refer to.
Letting them be exploited hurts everyone economically and is inhumane to allow.
Most people I know have a set amount that they save and they only live 'paycheck to paycheck' with those deductions coming out first for their 401k, TSP or IRAs. They have health care pretax deductions that go into savings. Their mortgages are another big investment that they build up equity in and is another form of savings, not to mention enough insurance to float a battleship.
No most people in fact do not live paycheck2paycheck.
Children can be put to work after they hit the age of 8 or so, if not on a farm then doing chores that makes the life of the family easier and more more comfortable. God determines how many kids we have and to tell Him what that number is is just horse shit.
Less than half of US workers have a 401k or any kind of pension. I guess the people I know are a lower class than the ones you know. Most of the ones I know rent and are not buying a house.
Does God determine when you can engage in sexual intercourse?
Does God not care if the children he determines you can have are being provided for?
I'm thinking God would not want you to have a child that you cannot raise properly.
Then God would not allow the conception of the child, dude.
All children are a blessing from God.
So God doesn't allow conception of children unless they can be well provided for?
I think the millions of starving children in Africa would disagree.
Hungry children in africaOh, welfare then. I mean if they cut back on janitors, and now one is out of work, who was living paycheck to paycheck and his unemployment runs out, as everyone is cutting back on janitors, what is this unskilled worker to do. He has 2 children in school and his wife is working part time at Walmart?
What now?? They have not been able to save a dime, but both of them are hard workers , never missed a day of work and were there on time all the time.
Oh their car broke down and wife takes the bus to work. What now?? His low IQ is rather a disability , he did graduate from HS but that was when they didn't care if one knew how to read or not.
What the hell are you babbling about?
Who says living paycheck to paycheck is a bad thing? Hell, most everyone lives paycheck to paycheck. If it's dimes you want to save then you should not live above your means. You should not get married and have children if you can't afford to. Why should the rest of society pay for your bad choices?
This is not me, but I'm sure there are many people in this situation. Are you now saying the poorer levels of society should not get married or have kids? I thought that is the reason for open boarders, is to have younger people who work for less.
No one should have children until they are able to adequately provide for them.
I'll ignore your open borders comment because it has nothing to do with the conversation and is designed to pettifog the issues.
Your right, I agree with Trump, and herein lies the problem:
"During the debate, Trump said, “But, taxes too high, wages too high, we’re not going to be able to compete against the world. I hate to say it, but we have to leave it the way it is. People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum. But we can not do this if we are going to compete with the rest of the world. We just can’t do it.”
There is only room for so many at the top, real hard work, I'm just not sure what he means by that, working hard, or becoming what he is a deal maker. Very easy for someone born with a silver spoon to say. That should also include cutting wall street pay and Ceo's pay, I am for higher taxes on the rich, no more non profit orgs and charitable deductions allowed, and stopping wasteful gov. spending. The charitable orgs they give to are usually self made, and so are the non profits as a way to filter money and avoid taxes.
Don't think he a saying that at all. Making non profits pay their fair share and raising taxes the wealthy was his his strategy, not capping wages.