Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GISS data is doctored, "homogenized" shit.Yeah, right. You can see the globalists' fingerprints all over this, clear as day...
Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots
AGW isn't science, fool. It's propaganda and a huge con.Threads like this show how America is no longer exceptional.
Science is not "left-wing propaganda". In fact, science is the antithesis of propaganda, fools.
Ah, a dumb fuck rightard. The lesser spotted variety, at a guess.So the world,started in 1880.....do tell.
A greater spotted rightard dumb fuck by the look. Gods, how do they manage to breathe?AGW isn't science, fool. It's propaganda and a huge con.
I like the way mouth breathers without a clue dismiss data they have no chance of replacing with anything but their imagination.GISS data is doctored, "homogenized" shit.
Brilliant retort, moron. I'll be you spent a whole 5 seconds thinking that one up.A greater spotted rightard dumb fuck by the look. Gods, how do they manage to breathe?AGW isn't science, fool. It's propaganda and a huge con.
No, I believe one of your fucktard LWNJ friends posted what I challenged....Ah, a dumb fuck rightard. The lesser spotted variety, at a guess.So the world,started in 1880.....do tell.
Science is settled,,right?Next they'll start wittering about 'scientific proof' again.
GISS has been documented to be altered numerous times.I like the way mouth breathers without a clue dismiss data they have no chance of replacing with anything but their imagination.GISS data is doctored, "homogenized" shit.
The climate has been changing for as long as the Earth has existed. Or for as long as it's had a climate, at least.
Sometimes the climate gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.
People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...
...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.
Not one. In forty-five years.
Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:
1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.
2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).
3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.
No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.
And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.
FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.
There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.
And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.
Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.
Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.
Emotion....white flag of debate fail used by LWNJs.....The climate has been changing for as long as the Earth has existed. Or for as long as it's had a climate, at least.
Sometimes the climate gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.
People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...
...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.
Not one. In forty-five years.
Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:
1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.
2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).
3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.
No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.
And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.
FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.
There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.
And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.
Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.
Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.
So you have no children & grandchildren. For if you did, you would certainly be concerned & realize that you don't really know shit about climate science & maybe, just maybe, you should pay attention to the vast majority of climate scientists that agree with MMGW.
But nooooooooooooooooo.
I live in a section of PA that was known for its orchards. I was talking with a commercial beekeeper that rented his hives to orchards for pollination. I asked if he did a lot in our local apple orchards. He sad that apples require a cold snap in order to sweeten & that it was just not happening anymore on our area. The orchards pulled out & moved to update NY. Orchards were dozed & housing development arose.
Or did you know that every day that the temps reach a 90 or 95, that corn productions drops?
You really need to see if your climate denial is just you being duped by the political right funded by fossil fuel industries.
Man up & do something to actually help future generations instead of denial & condemning them to a more difficult future.
Here is an acorn study: Climate Change Hitting Acorn Crops Hard, Says Woodland Trust
The climate has been changing for as long as the Earth has existed. Or for as long as it's had a climate, at least.
Sometimes the climate gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.
People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...
...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.
Not one. In forty-five years.
Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:
1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.
2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).
3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.
No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.
And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.
FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.
There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.
And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.
Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.
Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.
So you have no children & grandchildren. For if you did, you would certainly be concerned & realize that you don't really know shit about climate science & maybe, just maybe, you should pay attention to the vast majority of climate scientists that agree with MMGW.
But nooooooooooooooooo.
I live in a section of PA that was known for its orchards. I was talking with a commercial beekeeper that rented his hives to orchards for pollination. I asked if he did a lot in our local apple orchards. He sad that apples require a cold snap in order to sweeten & that it was just not happening anymore on our area. The orchards pulled out & moved to update NY. Orchards were dozed & housing development arose.
Or did you know that every day that the temps reach a 90 or 95, that corn productions drops?
You really need to see if your climate denial is just you being duped by the political right funded by fossil fuel industries.
Man up & do something to actually help future generations instead of denial & condemning them to a more difficult future.
Here is an acorn study: Climate Change Hitting Acorn Crops Hard, Says Woodland Trust
It's the LWNJs holy grail....control....The GW fraudsters and their brainwashed doomsday cult members would like to spend the entire GDP on climate "research".
The climate has been changing for as long as the Earth has existed. Or for as long as it's had a climate, at least.
Sometimes the climate gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.
People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...
...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.
Not one. In forty-five years.
Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:
1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.
2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).
3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.
No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.
And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.
FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.
There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.
And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.
Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.
Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.
So you have no children & grandchildren. For if you did, you would certainly be concerned & realize that you don't really know shit about climate science & maybe, just maybe, you should pay attention to the vast majority of climate scientists that agree with MMGW.
But nooooooooooooooooo.
I live in a section of PA that was known for its orchards. I was talking with a commercial beekeeper that rented his hives to orchards for pollination. I asked if he did a lot in our local apple orchards. He sad that apples require a cold snap in order to sweeten & that it was just not happening anymore on our area. The orchards pulled out & moved to update NY. Orchards were dozed & housing development arose.
Or did you know that every day that the temps reach a 90 or 95, that corn productions drops?
You really need to see if your climate denial is just you being duped by the political right funded by fossil fuel industries.
Man up & do something to actually help future generations instead of denial & condemning them to a more difficult future.
Here is an acorn study: Climate Change Hitting Acorn Crops Hard, Says Woodland Trust
Corn production has been up every year for at least 200 years. The markets are full of apples. Where is the actual empirical evidence that your hysterical fear mongering is valid?
Tracking meteors is super dumb since Jesus is handling that shitSweet, cut out the $2.8 billion in the budget and give it to the general public in refund checks so we can buy shit to celebrate the end of the world when we get hit by a huge meteor in the next 10 years.
Of course, tracking meteors has absolutely nothing to do with climate change science, but hey .... let's not a good fact get in the way of a fictional crisis.
The idea that you want to defund research is proof you are afraid of the rersults. OMG OMG OMG your denier gods might be wrong,The GW fraudsters and their brainwashed doomsday cult members would like to spend the entire GDP on climate "research".
Climate change is always happening....Tracking meteors is super dumb since Jesus is handling that shitSweet, cut out the $2.8 billion in the budget and give it to the general public in refund checks so we can buy shit to celebrate the end of the world when we get hit by a huge meteor in the next 10 years.
Of course, tracking meteors has absolutely nothing to do with climate change science, but hey .... let's not a good fact get in the way of a fictional crisis.
It is the same method as they used in gun crime...
If you cut all funding to research on it then you don't have to deal with the results..
Fact is that Climate Change is happening at an alarming rate and it is highly likely to be caused by human activity...
Even nearly all the sceptical scientists have admitted that climate change at an alarming rate is happening... Only ones left are non scientists really...
Trump's guy for EPA is not a scientist and is only there because he is a sceptic...
Thing is that this should have never been a right or left issue... The science is pretty irrefutable at this stage... this is a simple case of putting your head in the sand or do something about it issue...
