Trump walked back Constitution remark so what's the big deal. Trump will be Trump.

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
4,701
7,816
1,930
If he gave a detailed position showing he really meant it that would be one thing. Instead it was another Trump rant shooting from the lip. So no one cares. The Constitution breakers are the Dems who overthrew the election in 2020 and now Arizona, then gaslight about it as if no one has a brain. They are the living breathing threat to democracy. Not Trump's middle of night rants.
 
If he gave a detailed position showing he really meant it that would be one thing. Instead it was another Trump rant shooting from the lip. So no one cares. The Constitution breakers are the Dems who overthrew the election in 2020 and now Arizona, then gaslight about it as if no one has a brain. They are the living breathing threat to democracy. Not Trump's middle of night rants.
Pretty weak as far as Trump apologists posts.

Just seems arbitrary and pointless...making it easy to see you are simply running cover for Trump.
 
If he gave a detailed position showing he really meant it that would be one thing. Instead it was another Trump rant shooting from the lip. So no one cares. The Constitution breakers are the Dems who overthrew the election in 2020 and now Arizona, then gaslight about it as if no one has a brain. They are the living breathing threat to democracy. Not Trump's middle of night rants.

The libs don't know the difference between a man's words and a man's deeds. If Trump should be judged, it should be by his actions, not some off the cuff statement he made. And those actions or lack of actions speak far louder than words...

"Of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most indifferent or the most obstructed when it came to using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies.

For the Left, Donald Trump is synonymous with “fascism” (or “semi-fascism,” as Joe Biden put it the other day). And for Liz Cheney and most of the NeverTrumpers, he remains an existential threat to democracy.

But to quantify those charges, what exactly has Trump done extralegally - as opposed to his bombast and braggadocio about what he might have wished to have done?

And what are the standards by which to judge this supposed menace?

Did Trump illegally and with a mere signature nullify over $300 billion of contracted student loans—to firm up his college-student and college-graduate base nine weeks before the midterm elections?

If Trump wished to abuse his power over the IRS, he would have followed the Obama model of weaponizing it during a reelection year to go after his ideological enemies.

Did Trump blatantly use the national security apparatus of the government to enhance his own reelection bid in 2020?

Was Trump ever caught on a hot mic promising a Russian president that he would try to ease Russian worries about Eastern European missile defense if only the Russians would give him space during his 2012 campaign for president against Mitt Romney?

Did Trump weaponize the FBI? That is, did the FBI go after journalists, former Obama officials, or Democratic Party activists who variously were attacking Don Jr. or Ivanka on the pretenses of retrieving one of their lost laptops or diaries?

Are there texts of Trump-era FBI agents talking about how to “stop” Hillary Clinton’s or Biden’s election bid?

Did the Trump Justice Department start an investigation of the suspected illegal lobbying of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, who used the former’s political connections to win large cash payments from foreign governments?

Did Trump order an FBI raid on the Obama home, on rumors that there were thousands of documents under dispute with the National Archives in his possession, especially given the Obama record of fiercely fighting any Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to release his documents?

Was Jake Sullivan’s phone grabbed by the FBI at an airport to determine his role in the Russian collusion hoax?

Are there now any former Trump loyalists who, as “anonymous” officials in cabinet agencies or obstructionists on the National Security Council, are writing op-eds about their stealthy daily efforts to undermine Biden’s executive orders or his administration’s action?

Are there now “50 former intelligence officials” who signed affidavits in support of Trump’s allegations about the authenticity of Hunter’s laptop?

Between 2017 and 2020, did Trump’s team systematically seek to change the voting laws in key states to radically transform traditional balloting, in a mail-in or early voting revolution, in which only 30 percent of the electorate would vote on Election Day?

Was there any “dark money” effort analogous to the efforts of corporate and tech money along with DNC activists and Biden operators in what Time magazine’s Molly Ball described as a “conspiracy” to ensure the defeat of Trump’s opponent?

How about Trump’s efforts to revolutionize the very system of government? Did he promote a court-packing scheme to ensure he might not just get a 5-4 majority, but perhaps an 11-4 conservative advantage in a new 15-justice Supreme Court?

Did he dream up ways of getting rid of the Electoral College so the “blue wall” might never return?

Did Trump as president meet with CIA and FBI directors who, in their weekly and daily briefings, apprised him of efforts to monitor, spy, and infiltrate the campaign of Joe Biden?

The strange thing about Trump was that he did not use extraordinary powers to investigate anyone unlawfully. He boasted, he railed, he screamed, he whined, he became at times crude and obnoxious. But he did not use the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, or the IRS to go after the Obamas, the Clintons, or the Bidens.

In fact, of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most inept or indifferent, or the most obstructed concerning any issue of using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies. "

The Strangest Thing About "Semi-Fascist" Trump | ZeroHedge
 
Pretty weak as far as Trump apologists posts.

Just seems arbitrary and pointless...making it easy to see you are simply running cover for Trump.

What is weak is this attempt to flog a dead horse endlessly when the remark was walked back. It is straight out of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, accuse the other of doing that which you are doing. The American dialogue is on a Fifth grade level. The Democratic party thinks people who vote Democrat are morons so they feed them this swill. Meanwhile the price of a small coffee at McDonalds went up 10% today, in one day.
 
I want to know how Trump plans to drain the swamp this time.

He tried once, and failed miserably. The swamp ate him alive.

I don't think he can do it. He doesn't have the clout, or the political support.
 
What is weak is this attempt to flog a dead horse endlessly when the remark was walked back.

Advocating for terminating the constitution from the leading Republican and presidential candidate is a pretty big deal.

It is straight out of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, accuse the other of doing that which you are doing.

Which Democrat called for terminating the constitution?

The American dialogue is on a Fifth grade level.

From the Republican side, I would agree. Reading transcripts from Trump will certainly fry a person's brain.

The Democratic party thinks people who vote Democrat are morons so they feed them this swill.

It was Trump that stated we should terminate the constitution, not Democrats.

Meanwhile the price of a small coffee at McDonalds went up 10% today, in one day.
Ahhh, I'm sorry. Please victim hood more.
 
If he gave a detailed position showing he really meant it that would be one thing. Instead it was another Trump rant shooting from the lip. So no one cares. The Constitution breakers are the Dems who overthrew the election in 2020 and now Arizona, then gaslight about it as if no one has a brain. They are the living breathing threat to democracy. Not Trump's middle of night rants.
Bull$hit.

First, his summoning and incitement of an Insurrection and assault against the United States Congress on January 6, 2021.

Now, his public advocating for a termination of various provisions of the Constitution of the United States.


He is a traitor.

No more excuse-making... no more explaining-away.,.. no more bull$hit rationalizations... he should have thought before he opened his big mouth.

Too late now.

And he will be made to pay for it... politically... and in the Law Courts... criminal and civil.

Moving forward, I'd be a little more careful about Guilt-by-Association, eh?

But you go right on ahead backing that a$$hole... your Orange Comb-Over Albatross... assuming, that is, that you want to lose - Bigly - in 2024.
 
Last edited:
Bull$hit.

First, his summoning and incitement of an Insurrection against the United States Congress on January 6, 2021.

Now, his public advocating for a termination of various provisions of the Constitution of the United States.

He is a traitor.

No more excuse-making... no more explaining-away.,.. no more bull$hit rationalizations... he should have thought before he opened his big mouth.

Too late now.

Moving forward, I'd be a little more careful about Guilt-by-Association, eh?

But you go right on ahead backing that a$$hole... your Orange Comb-Over Albatross... assuming, that is, that you want to lose - Bigly - in 2024.
I bet you live in a nice White suburb.
 
Nope. A racially and politically diverse suburb. None of which matters a damn in condemning that Orange Piece-of-$hit you worship.
Of course it does.
You haters Trump back in 2015 and never stated why except for your FEELINGS.
 
Irrelevant to whether or not Rump is a traitorous piece-of-$hit who incited Insurrection and who advocates setting aside the Constitution for the sake of his personal power.
You lie since you hated him since the moment he tossed his hat in the ring in 2015.
 
I stipulate that Trump’s infamous post on Truth was tragically stupid.

I also agree that he is rightly judged, in part, on what he says.

But he is therefore also rightly judged by what he later recants.

And he is rightly judged on what he does, not just on what he has said.
 
The libs don't know the difference between a man's words and a man's deeds. If Trump should be judged, it should be by his actions, not some off the cuff statement he made. And those actions or lack of actions speak far louder than words...

"Of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most indifferent or the most obstructed when it came to using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies.

For the Left, Donald Trump is synonymous with “fascism” (or “semi-fascism,” as Joe Biden put it the other day). And for Liz Cheney and most of the NeverTrumpers, he remains an existential threat to democracy.

But to quantify those charges, what exactly has Trump done extralegally - as opposed to his bombast and braggadocio about what he might have wished to have done?

And what are the standards by which to judge this supposed menace?

Did Trump illegally and with a mere signature nullify over $300 billion of contracted student loans—to firm up his college-student and college-graduate base nine weeks before the midterm elections?

If Trump wished to abuse his power over the IRS, he would have followed the Obama model of weaponizing it during a reelection year to go after his ideological enemies.

Did Trump blatantly use the national security apparatus of the government to enhance his own reelection bid in 2020?

Was Trump ever caught on a hot mic promising a Russian president that he would try to ease Russian worries about Eastern European missile defense if only the Russians would give him space during his 2012 campaign for president against Mitt Romney?

Did Trump weaponize the FBI? That is, did the FBI go after journalists, former Obama officials, or Democratic Party activists who variously were attacking Don Jr. or Ivanka on the pretenses of retrieving one of their lost laptops or diaries?

Are there texts of Trump-era FBI agents talking about how to “stop” Hillary Clinton’s or Biden’s election bid?

Did the Trump Justice Department start an investigation of the suspected illegal lobbying of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, who used the former’s political connections to win large cash payments from foreign governments?

Did Trump order an FBI raid on the Obama home, on rumors that there were thousands of documents under dispute with the National Archives in his possession, especially given the Obama record of fiercely fighting any Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to release his documents?

Was Jake Sullivan’s phone grabbed by the FBI at an airport to determine his role in the Russian collusion hoax?

Are there now any former Trump loyalists who, as “anonymous” officials in cabinet agencies or obstructionists on the National Security Council, are writing op-eds about their stealthy daily efforts to undermine Biden’s executive orders or his administration’s action?

Are there now “50 former intelligence officials” who signed affidavits in support of Trump’s allegations about the authenticity of Hunter’s laptop?

Between 2017 and 2020, did Trump’s team systematically seek to change the voting laws in key states to radically transform traditional balloting, in a mail-in or early voting revolution, in which only 30 percent of the electorate would vote on Election Day?

Was there any “dark money” effort analogous to the efforts of corporate and tech money along with DNC activists and Biden operators in what Time magazine’s Molly Ball described as a “conspiracy” to ensure the defeat of Trump’s opponent?

How about Trump’s efforts to revolutionize the very system of government? Did he promote a court-packing scheme to ensure he might not just get a 5-4 majority, but perhaps an 11-4 conservative advantage in a new 15-justice Supreme Court?

Did he dream up ways of getting rid of the Electoral College so the “blue wall” might never return?

Did Trump as president meet with CIA and FBI directors who, in their weekly and daily briefings, apprised him of efforts to monitor, spy, and infiltrate the campaign of Joe Biden?

The strange thing about Trump was that he did not use extraordinary powers to investigate anyone unlawfully. He boasted, he railed, he screamed, he whined, he became at times crude and obnoxious. But he did not use the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, or the IRS to go after the Obamas, the Clintons, or the Bidens.

In fact, of the last three presidents, Trump was either the most inept or indifferent, or the most obstructed concerning any issue of using government agencies for his own partisan political advantages or to neuter his enemies. "

The Strangest Thing About "Semi-Fascist" Trump | ZeroHedge

Trump doesn't know the meaning of fascism... That's why he loves the uneducated..in 1992 he ranted and raved against the Electoral College. He wanted to get rid of it.
 
Trump doesn't know the meaning of fascism... That's why he loves the uneducated..in1992 he wanted and raved against the Electoral College. He wanted to get rid of it.
Now, of course, it’s you libtards who rail against the Electoral College. :itsok:
 
I stipulate that Trump’s infamous post on Truth was tragically stupid.

I also agree that he is rightly judged, in part, on what he says.

But he is therefore also rightly judged by what he later recants.

And he is rightly judged on what he does, not just on what he has said.
Fortunately for the Republic he will get no further chance to "does" (do) from the Oval Office.
 
Irrelevant to whether Rump summoned and incited Insurrection, and assault against Congress, and has now called for setting aside the Constitution and reinstating him.
Thanks for admitting you are a slum dwelling liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top