Trump's Deutsche bank loans cosigned by Russian Oligarch?

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.

The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.

If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.

Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.

Oh, boy.

Why could they NOT verify this story?

How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?

When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.

Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.

Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).

Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.

.

 

[SAYIT]

Russian spies.

Post evidence or retract.

If you are not sure what that means see how O'Donnel just did it.

You want evidence that the British spies sources were Russian spies?

British spies means spies that work for Britain. It does not mean British citizens, they could be Russian citizens that are spying for Britain on Russian government. Russian spies means spies that work for Russia.

So go ahead and prove that someone was working with Russian spies.

Why was Steele hired? Because he had Russian sources.
You think his sources were Russians working in a hotel?
Common Russian citizens that he just called up for dirt on Trump?

That's funny.

Whats funny is is how pathetically inedequate your understanding of the world is.

Belive it or not but there are people that live in Russia come to work, go have a drink (or ten) and have dealings with politicans and bussinesses. They hear things and they just may share some of that info with an interested party for a few bucks.

To date there has not been any indication that Steele was knowingly or un-knowingly fed by the Russian intelligence. In fact his Dossier was directly counter to Russian interests.

And even less that Trump "colluded" with the Russians yet many of your comrades continue to spew their unshaken and unshakable belief in their Collusion Delusion ... perhaps even you are among the MORONS.

Either way you media LIES to you repeatedly and you swallow eagerly.

 

[WEATHER53]

He called it unverified. Not false.

I would like Mr. O'Donnell to clarify.

Is the statement false, Mr. O'Donnell? Go on record.



O'Donnell can either keep is mouth shut, or say it's false. He cannot ride the fence now.

And no other media outlet can jump in on it either, or they are doing the exact same thing.

Thus.... true or false, IT IS FALSE.



O'Donnell fuck it up for EVERYBODY.


.

The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.

The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.

If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.

Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.

My cousins hairdressers maid confirmed it

 

[francoHFW]

The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.

The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.

If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.

Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.

Oh, boy.

Why could they NOT verify this story?

How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?

When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.

Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.

Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).

Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.

.

only a brainwashed functional moron would believe that. About 30% of the country at this point. This is like the Dan Rather thing that was absolutely true but he was given fake paperwork by somebody or other. Of course what he's reported about George W Bush was true. He basically blew off the National guard. Just shows you the power of the propaganda machine again....and you people believe hundreds of phony scandals about Democrats with no evidence whatsoever, just pure propaganda. O'Donnell said he only had one source but he believed it and was kind of a prediction. You people are a disgrace.

 

[Markle]

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you have no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believing something like that to be likely true does not make one gullible.

My highlight above for clarity.

Who can make that up?

Fort Fun Indiana, for your seriously reluctant edification.

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell retracts report that Trump loan had Russian signers
By Eli Rosenberg and Herman Wong
[URL='https://twitter.com/emrosenberg'][/URL]
August 29 at 7:52 AM

"Tonight we are retracting the story,” he said Wednesday. “We don’t know whether the information is inaccurate but the fact is we do know it wasn’t ready for broadcast and for that I apologize.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts...y-trump-had-threatened-sue-him/?noredirect=on

What part is not clear to you?

 

[NightFox]

Where do libs get the idea he is some kind of doofus or failure?

Two words....

Taj Mahal

A failure of doofus proportions.

a new jersey casino went bankrupt. wow, in one of the most corrupt states in the country, means nothing.

LOL, Yeah it was the State of New Jersey that forced Donny to borrow the better part of a billion smackers using Junk Bonds at 14% to finance the Taj MaFuckUp.

Isn't wasn't corruption that caused the Taj to collapse it was Donnys lack of common sense.

 

[SAYIT]

Please don't project what the Clintons do onto this situation....try to stay focused on the topic.

Lol, nice deflection. Do you think the nickname "mafia dOn" is just a joke?

A joke? Actually just a silly slur spewed by bitter, hate-filled leftarded losers.

 

[iceberg]

The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.

The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.

If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.

Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.

Oh, boy.

Why could they NOT verify this story?

How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?

When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.

Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.

Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).

Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.

.

they didn't want to.

 

[iceberg]

Deutsche Bank has Trump’s taxes — and loan applications cosigned by Russian oligarchs: report

This story breaking. If this is true....

What will the Trumpettes say about this? Will they support impeachment?

The trails that lead from Trump's relationship with this bank could easily put Trump in prison. The ties to retired USSC Kennedy, the times to Russia & Trump, the ties to Trump falsification of documents provided to the government.

As this becomes more & more likely, when will Republicans in the Senate start to jump ship?

sad we have to qualify "if this is true" from major "news" sources.

then again, TDS and haters don't need validation, just some form of retribution.

 

[AntonToo]

Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.

Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.
.

You don't know wtf you are talking about.

 

[jc456]

Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.

Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.

Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.

And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.

O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.

.

He called it unverified. Not false.

so what was verified to make it true? It's either true, or it's false, there's no middle ground. So you think he thinks it's true today?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,

Such utter nonsense....

Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...

 

[SAYIT]

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

More whining?

I think this report to be likely true, as it explains the very odd lending behavior of deutsche bank.

Address that, or just whine. Your call.

Yeah ... because profit could not possibly have motivated the bank.

Even you must know by now that you are an IDIOT, right?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

only a brainwashed functional moron would believe that. About 30% of the country at this point. This is like the Dan Rather thing that was absolutely true but he was given fake paperwork by somebody or other. Of course what he's reported about George W Bush was true. He basically blew off the National guard. Just shows you the power of the propaganda machine again....and you people believe hundreds of phony scandals about Democrats with no evidence whatsoever, just pure propaganda. O'Donnell said he only had one source but he believed it and was kind of a prediction. You people are a disgrace.

So, Dan Rather was really a hero for making up fake documents and passing them off as true, just because he was ultimately right about his message? Do you read what you type and consider how it appears?

In their insatiable desire to pound out their own propaganda, they report, as true, things that cannot be verified, or they just make shit up, just so they can prove what they believe is true. Ethics be damned, as long as they can report what they believe is true, right?

Do you see this as a problem?

A brainwashed functional moron would defend that unethical, dishonest behavior. Ask yourself if you are such a person.

You guys are revealing your true character here. Keep it up.

.

 

[Meathead]

Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,

Such utter nonsense....

Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...

"Trumpkins" are pissing on you and you seem to be enjoying it more than them. Sick shit!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Please don't project what the Clintons do onto this situation....try to stay focused on the topic.

Lol, nice deflection. Do you think the nickname "mafia dOn" is just a joke?

A joke? Actually just a silly slur spewed by bitter, hate-filled leftarded losers.

Yeah, you trump cultists keep saying that.

Yet not one of you has even attempted to make an argument as to why it would not make sense,or why it is likely false.

Not a single one of you.

Because...every single one of you believes it is probably true.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,

Such utter nonsense....

Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...

You have been wrong about EVERYTHING you have posted in this thread. Do you want to go for broke?



Go ahead. Double down on WRONG.

.

 

[jc456]

Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,

Such utter nonsense....

Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...

curious, why do you care so deeply for O'Donnell? I would have thought you'd be mad he made your argument look weak. and that he confirms fake news. and yet here you got his back on some information he spouted that is grossly false. I'll never understand backing that. ever.

 

[jc456]

Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,

Such utter nonsense....

Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...

You have been wrong about EVERYTHING you have posted in this thread. Do you want to go for broke?



Go ahead. Double down on WRONG.

.

it's obvious he doesn't care about his integrity at all.

 

[NightFox]

The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.

The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.

If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.

Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.

Oh, boy.

Why could they NOT verify this story?

How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?

When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.

Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.

Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).

Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.

.

they didn't want to.

Yeah why go through all the bother of verification when you can just "report"?

After all vast swaths of stupid fucks will still take the story as fact after you've told them that it was based on unsubstantiated nonsense.