Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the trump lawyers will make him decide.Well, let's talk about it.Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.
.
Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.
That's just ONE of his many.False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.
Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??
.
I admit I made a statement that was false, there was ONE person here who denied there was a retraction.
What does the retraction mean?
Will O'Donnell state that he still believes that it's probably true?
Will he even broach the topic again...ever?
What do you think?
.
Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
simply no integrity at all. amazing. dishonest as the day is long typical evil left.Well, let's talk about it.Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.
.
Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.
That's just ONE of his many.False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.
Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??
.
I admit I made a statement that was false, there was ONE person here who denied there was a retraction.
What does the retraction mean?
Will O'Donnell state that he still believes that it's probably true?
Will he even broach the topic again...ever?
What do you think?
.
Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
well the defamation charge is coming if what I heard this morning about the trump lawyers is true. we'll see that's for sure. But what I heard was trump's lawyers told the dude to retract it or else.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
The Russian interference lives regardless of your attempts to pretend it doesn't. The Russians interfered, Trump called our intel agencies stupid & believed Putin. Trump & Moscow Mitch have done nothing to stop it from happening again. So explain that assfuck or STFUThe Russian narrative has already failed, dumbfuck. The rest of you bigoted lying loons have moved on to white supremacy and recession.
He called it unverified. Not false.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
only in your head, putin is in your head. we all laugh at you, you sorry fk.The Russian interference lives regardless of your attempts to pretend it doesn't. The Russians interfered, Trump called our intel agencies stupid & believed Putin. Trump & Moscow Mitch have done nothing to stop it from happening again. So explain that assfuck or STFUThe Russian narrative has already failed, dumbfuck. The rest of you bigoted lying loons have moved on to white supremacy and recession.
And yep, you assfucks are still racists & white supremacists.
He called it unverified. Not false.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
nothing more accurately stated.He called it unverified. Not false.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
Yep, and we call it fake news bullshit.
Where do libs get the idea he is some kind of doofus or failure?
Two words....
Taj Mahal
A failure of doofus proportions.
a new jersey casino went bankrupt. wow, in one of the most corrupt states in the country, means nothing.
I would like Mr. O'Donnell to clarify.He called it unverified. Not false.
Deutsche Bank has Trump’s taxes — and loan applications cosigned by Russian oligarchs: report
This story breaking. If this is true....
What will the Trumpettes say about this? Will they support impeachment?
The trails that lead from Trump's relationship with this bank could easily put Trump in prison. The ties to retired USSC Kennedy, the times to Russia & Trump, the ties to Trump falsification of documents provided to the government.
As this becomes more & more likely, when will Republicans in the Senate start to jump ship?
Dave...Dave...Dave!!! Do you honestly believe that Mueller's little crew of assassins wouldn't have been all over something like this if it were true? They went over Trump's financial dealings with a microscope and came up with nothing but you think they somehow MISSED him doing this? How naïve are you?
you know this how? come on dude, step out and tell us where you learned this? Which US Bank told you that? Step out and walk the walk, I'm tired of all your talk.Deutsche Bank has Trump’s taxes — and loan applications cosigned by Russian oligarchs: report
This story breaking. If this is true....
What will the Trumpettes say about this? Will they support impeachment?
The trails that lead from Trump's relationship with this bank could easily put Trump in prison. The ties to retired USSC Kennedy, the times to Russia & Trump, the ties to Trump falsification of documents provided to the government.
As this becomes more & more likely, when will Republicans in the Senate start to jump ship?
Dave...Dave...Dave!!! Do you honestly believe that Mueller's little crew of assassins wouldn't have been all over something like this if it were true? They went over Trump's financial dealings with a microscope and came up with nothing but you think they somehow MISSED him doing this? How naïve are you?
Mueller did not have access to the documentation.
How naive are you to think that this bank would loan Trump millions & millions when US banks would not?
How naive of you to ignore Trump's love affair with Putin
How dumb are you to ignore Trump's dishonesty?
I would like Mr. O'Donnell to clarify.He called it unverified. Not false.
Is the statement false, Mr. O'Donnell? Go on record.
O'Donnell can either keep is mouth shut, or say it's false. He cannot ride the fence now.
And no other media outlet can jump in on it either, or they are doing the exact same thing.
Thus.... true or false, IT IS FALSE.
O'Donnell fuck it up for EVERYBODY.
.
how the fk do you know the story is true? fk you leftist fks are so fking condescending. You really give your side a bad reputation you know? BTW, you know shit about this. stop acting like you investigated this.I would like Mr. O'Donnell to clarify.He called it unverified. Not false.
Is the statement false, Mr. O'Donnell? Go on record.
O'Donnell can either keep is mouth shut, or say it's false. He cannot ride the fence now.
And no other media outlet can jump in on it either, or they are doing the exact same thing.
Thus.... true or false, IT IS FALSE.
O'Donnell fuck it up for EVERYBODY.
.
The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
We'll see about that, super duper. Meanwhile your propaganda machine has had hundreds of ridiculous phony scandals against Hillary Obama the FBI with no evidence or proof whatsoever going back 30 years now since Rush Limbaugh started, and which you brainwashed functional morons all believe. You people are absolutely ridiculous.It's a pathetic attempt to spin the focus from the fact that yet another liberal, Socialist Democrat Party lapdog member of the anti-Trump media was caught making shit up - as always - about the President.what does Hannity have to do with this?