Trump's Deutsche bank loans cosigned by Russian Oligarch?

[Markle]

A source with knowledge of Trump's loans with the German bank told it.

 

[Redfish]

Where do libs get the idea he is some kind of doofus or failure?

Two words....

Taj Mahal

A failure of doofus proportions.

a new jersey casino went bankrupt. wow, in one of the most corrupt states in the country, means nothing.

 

[Polishprince]

Where do libs get the idea he is some kind of doofus or failure?

Two words....

Taj Mahal

A failure of doofus proportions.

Everyone has had failures, except for those who have never tried anything.

Trump was willing to make bold moves

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

He retracted because it had not yet been verified. The Press tries to verify things before they report. More than I can say for your lie spewing President,

ROFLMAO! Are you really this stupid? If MSNBC would have "tried" to verify the story BEFORE it was reported they wouldn't be retracting it now ya fucking retard.

.... your post deserves a prize for the most vapid post of the month.

but but but it wasn't a retraction!



.

Said no one ever.

Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.


.

Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.

What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.

False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.

That's just ONE of his many.

Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??



.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I think O'Donnell should go back on the air and say that he can't verify it, but he thinks his prior report on Trump was PROBABLY true.

Let's see where that goes.



.

 

[NightFox]

Where do libs get the idea he is some kind of doofus or failure?

Two words....

Taj Mahal

A failure of doofus proportions.

Everyone has had failures, except for those who have never tried anything.

Trump was willing to make bold moves

Yeah and EXCEPTIONALLY STUPID ones too, like financing over a billion bucks at 14% to build a casino that couldn't possibly meet the daily nut that its debt generated, apparently Donny isn't too great with math.

I tip my hat to risk takers however I have nothing but contempt for business people that make idiotic decisions and then leave everyone else holding the bag when it comes time for the piper to be paid.

 

[Oldstyle]

Deutsche Bank has Trump’s taxes — and loan applications cosigned by Russian oligarchs: report

This story breaking. If this is true....

What will the Trumpettes say about this? Will they support impeachment?

The trails that lead from Trump's relationship with this bank could easily put Trump in prison. The ties to retired USSC Kennedy, the times to Russia & Trump, the ties to Trump falsification of documents provided to the government.

As this becomes more & more likely, when will Republicans in the Senate start to jump ship?

Dave...Dave...Dave!!! Do you honestly believe that Mueller's little crew of assassins wouldn't have been all over something like this if it were true? They went over Trump's financial dealings with a microscope and came up with nothing but you think they somehow MISSED him doing this? How naïve are you?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He didn't retract his claim.

Well, in that case, I think O'Donnell needs to go on record and say that very thing.

He needs to say that his prior reporting was totally true and that he did nothing wrong. He needs to state publicly that all he reported is unequivocally true and he has sources to prove it.

Do you think he will?

Why not?

I will wait for your undoubtedly snarky-assed response.


.

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you have no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believing something like that to be likely true does not make one gullible.

 

[Oldstyle]

Well, in that case, I think O'Donnell needs to go on record and say that very thing.

He needs to say that his prior reporting was totally true and that he did nothing wrong. He needs to state publicly that all he reported is unequivocally true and he has sources to prove it.

Do you think he will?

Why not?

I will wait for your undoubtedly snarky-assed response.


.

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

Going with a story because you hope that it's true is shoddy journalism. Going public with a story without verifying it because you hate the person you've done the story on will land you in court with a defamation law suit. O'Donnell knew exactly what he was doing...as did MSNBC. He was forced to apologize because lawyers for MSNBC explained how FUBARed he'd be if he didn't retract the story.

 

[jc456]

Well, in that case, I think O'Donnell needs to go on record and say that very thing.

He needs to say that his prior reporting was totally true and that he did nothing wrong. He needs to state publicly that all he reported is unequivocally true and he has sources to prove it.

Do you think he will?

Why not?

I will wait for your undoubtedly snarky-assed response.


.

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you have no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believing something like that to be likely true does not make one gullible.

because it wasn't true, isn't true and never vetted. so the mere fact this asshat went out and stated something false, is why there is the term fake news. Nothing more glaring at the moment. and here you are doubling down on the fake. you have no dignity dude. I'd be ashamed to be related to you.

 

[NightFox]

Well, in that case, I think O'Donnell needs to go on record and say that very thing.

He needs to say that his prior reporting was totally true and that he did nothing wrong. He needs to state publicly that all he reported is unequivocally true and he has sources to prove it.

Do you think he will?

Why not?

I will wait for your undoubtedly snarky-assed response.


.

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

 

[easyt65]

Everyone has had failures, except for those who have never tried anything. Trump was willing to make bold moves

“A coward dies a thousand times before his death, but the valiant taste of death but once."

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Going public with a story without verifying it because you hate the person you've done the story on will land you in court with a defamation law suit.

Haha,yeah, good luck proving that.

 

[jc456]

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

it must be true, it must be true...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He already did that. His reporting was that a source told him something. He appears to be standing by that as true, as he has not refuted that.

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

More whining?

I think this report to be likely true, as it explains the very odd lending behavior of deutsche bank.

Address that, or just whine. Your call.

 

[AntonToo]

ROFLMAO! Are you really this stupid? If MSNBC would have "tried" to verify the story BEFORE it was reported they wouldn't be retracting it now ya fucking retard.

.... your post deserves a prize for the most vapid post of the month.

but but but it wasn't a retraction!



.

Said no one ever.

Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.


.

Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.

What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.

False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.

That's just ONE of his many.

Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??



.

I admit I made a statement that was false, there was ONE person here who denied there was a retraction.

 

[jc456]

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

More whining?

I think this report to be likely true, as it explains the very odd lending behavior of deutsche bank.

Address that, or just whine. Your call.

except that it isn't and all forms of you wanting it to be

won't make it such.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

ROFLMAO ! Yeah.. sounds like he's standing by it alright

O'Donnell said his reporting "didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process." In a tweeted statement, he added, "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air."

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Admits 'Error in Judgment' in Report on Trump Finances After President's Legal Threat

Sir, would you like to stand, hit or DOUBLE DOWN ON STUPID?

Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.

It's probably true.

ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.

I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.

That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.

Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.

LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?

I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.

More whining?

I think this report to be likely true, as it explains the very odd lending behavior of deutsche bank.

Address that, or just whine. Your call.

So true, that O'Donnell admitted that his source for such information was completely unverified and that he should not have said it on the air.

Do you think O'Donnell should say that he believes the story to be true, ON-AIR???

I think somebody should call in and ask him to comment. Do you think he will?



Still trying to ride that fence? I hope O'Donnell does (which his lawyers have undoubtedly advised against).


.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

but but but it wasn't a retraction!



.

Said no one ever.

Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.


.

Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.

What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.

False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.

That's just ONE of his many.

Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??



.

I admit I made a statement that was false, there was ONE person here who denied there was a retraction.

Well, let's talk about it.

What does the retraction mean?

Will O'Donnell state that he still believes that it's probably true?

Will he even broach the topic again...ever?

What do you think?

.

 

[AntonToo]

Said no one ever.

Said Fort Fun Indiana in this very thread at least 5 times.


.

Ok then quote him saying that retraction did not happen.

What I quoted is called a "retraction" even if he believes he reported the truth.

False. Not in any sense of that word. You said it because it sounded nice, but it was an error.

That's just ONE of his many.

Now, are you going to admit that you just made a statement that was false??



.

I admit I made a statement that was false, there was ONE person here who denied there was a retraction.

Well, let's talk about it.

What does the retraction mean?

Will O'Donnell state that he still believes that it's probably true?

Will he even broach the topic again...ever?

What do you think?

.

Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.

Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.