Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I underestimated you, FFI.Yeah, you trump cultists keep saying that.A joke? Actually just a silly slur spewed by bitter, hate-filled leftarded losers.Lol, nice deflection. Do you think the nickname "mafia dOn" is just a joke?Please don't project what the Clintons do onto this situation....try to stay focused on the topic.
Yet not one of you has even attempted to make an argument as to why it would not make sense,or why it is likely false.
Not a single one of you.
Because...every single one of you believes it is probably true.
Jesus Christ you are dumber than shit.so what was verified to make it true? It's either true, or it's false, there's no middle ground. So you think he thinks it's true today?He called it unverified. Not false.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
dude, I don't even know what the fk your latest even fking means. you are doubling down on stupid. I didn't think one could get any more than you've showed, and yet there it is.Yeah, you trump cultists keep saying that.A joke? Actually just a silly slur spewed by bitter, hate-filled leftarded losers.Lol, nice deflection. Do you think the nickname "mafia dOn" is just a joke?Please don't project what the Clintons do onto this situation....try to stay focused on the topic.
Yet not one of you has even attempted to make an argument as to why it would not make sense,or why it is likely false.
Not a single one of you.
Because...every single one of you believes it is probably true.
You believe Tfump. Go fuck yourselfthey didn't want to.Oh, boy.The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
Why could they NOT verify this story?
How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?
When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.
Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.
Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).
Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.
.
Yeah why go through all the bother of verification when you can just "report"?
After all vast swaths of stupid fucks will still take the story as fact after you've told them that it was based on unsubstantiated nonsense.
dude, can you see what you type? surely your point has more relevance then what you just posted. surely, and I apologize to all of them.Jesus Christ you are dumber than shit.so what was verified to make it true? It's either true, or it's false, there's no middle ground. So you think he thinks it's true today?He called it unverified. Not false.Ummm, no sir. That is NOT good enough. He cannot ride the fence or he is continuing to defame.Retraction means exactly what o'Donnel said it means - he should not have brought it up on air. That could be for many reasons so it's pointless to speculate about at this point.
And if O'Donnell says anything about that story, it better be nothing but calling it false, or he is in more trouble.Bottom line for us is that there is not sufficient reason to belive (or disbelieve) that there is a Russian co-signed loan for Trump. It is not yet supported, but it certainly would not be suprising if evidence does come up at some point.
O'Donnell has basically disqualified himself from ever talking about it again.
.
When they have one source, they typically confirm with a different source.
It is irrelevant to the truth.
So far, there is one source. Do we believe that one source or Fast Assed Trump?
Why don't you (or Mr. O'Donnell) prove it is true?Yeah, you trump cultists keep saying that.A joke? Actually just a silly slur spewed by bitter, hate-filled leftarded losers.Lol, nice deflection. Do you think the nickname "mafia dOn" is just a joke?Please don't project what the Clintons do onto this situation....try to stay focused on the topic.
Yet not one of you has even attempted to make an argument as to why it would not make sense,or why it is likely false.
Not a single one of you.
Because...every single one of you believes it is probably true.
Profit motivates banks on every loan. Yet banks don't do every loan. So that was an idiotic comment.Yeah ... because profit could not possibly have motivated the bank.
Trumpettes only piss on themselves like some old drunk."Trumpkins" are pissing on you and you seem to be enjoying it more than them. Sick shit!Such utter nonsense....Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,
Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...
That's a stupid comment. I think it is likely true, and I have said why. And not once have you worked up the stones to address those points. So stop whining and addres the points.Why don't you (or Mr. O'Donnell) prove it is true?
not anything more to add.they didn't want to.Oh, boy.The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
Why could they NOT verify this story?
How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?
When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.
Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.
Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).
Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.
.
Yeah why go through all the bother of verification when you can just "report"?
After all vast swaths of stupid fucks will still take the story as fact after you've told them that it was based on unsubstantiated nonsense.
I'll bet you swallow too.Trumpettes only piss on themselves like some old drunk."Trumpkins" are pissing on you and you seem to be enjoying it more than them. Sick shit!Such utter nonsense....Like I said earlier, given that O'Donnell's tweet is an admission of malicious intent,
Trumpkins, pissing in the wind again...
It is completely relevant to the truth.Jesus Christ you are dumber than shit.
When they have one source, they typically confirm with a different source.
It is irrelevant to the truth.
So far, there is one source. Do we believe that one source or Fast Assed Trump?
They do every loan they believe will bear profitable fruit. So your's was a moronic response ... again.Profit motivates banks on every loan. Yet banks don't do every loan. So that was an idiotic comment.Yeah ... because profit could not possibly have motivated the bank.
So, Dan Rather was really a hero for making up fake documents and passing them off as true, just because he was ultimately right about his message? Do you read what you type and consider how it appears?only a brainwashed functional moron would believe that. About 30% of the country at this point. This is like the Dan Rather thing that was absolutely true but he was given fake paperwork by somebody or other. Of course what he's reported about George W Bush was true. He basically blew off the National guard. Just shows you the power of the propaganda machine again....and you people believe hundreds of phony scandals about Democrats with no evidence whatsoever, just pure propaganda. O'Donnell said he only had one source but he believed it and was kind of a prediction. You people are a disgrace.
In their insatiable desire to pound out their own propaganda, they report, as true, things that cannot be verified, or they just make shit up, just so they can prove what they believe is true. Ethics be damned, as long as they can report what they believe is true, right?
Do you see this as a problem?
A brainwashed functional moron would defend that unethical, dishonest behavior. Ask yourself if you are such a person.
You guys are revealing your true character here. Keep it up.
.
They do every loan they believe will bear profitable fruit.
We don't have to believe or disbelieve Trump. That's irrelevant.You believe Tfump. Go fuck yourselfthey didn't want to.Oh, boy.The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
Why could they NOT verify this story?
How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?
When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.
Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.
Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).
Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.
.
Yeah why go through all the bother of verification when you can just "report"?
After all vast swaths of stupid fucks will still take the story as fact after you've told them that it was based on unsubstantiated nonsense.
LOL, Since when? I haven't believed a word that's come out of Trump's mouth since at least the late 1980's.You believe Tfump.they didn't want to.Oh, boy.The story itself is true. A person with access told of Trump's cosigners.
The verification would involve this story being confirmed through other sources.
If some one stops by my house & tells be that you are a mass murderer. If I run around calling you mass murderer is different than reporting that someone stopped by & told me that you were a mass murderer.
Maybe you assdfucks can get that or not. Just allow Trump to threaten people to keep quit like he did with the girl he raped.
Why could they NOT verify this story?
How can ANYONE say the story is true ON-AIR when it cannot be verified?
When it comes to defamation, reporting that some anonymous source said you were a mass murderer is NO DIFFERENT than running around calling you a mass murderer. That's what you don't understand. The fact that someone reports that without verifying it's truth is a willful disregard for truth and evidence of malicious intent.
Even more troubling is the poison O'Donnell put on this whole story with his insanity. Nobody will TOUCH this story now. It could be the drop-dead, god-honest, lilly-white TRUTH, and it does not matter.
Thus, IT IS FALSE for all practical purposes (even if true).
Maybe YOU assfucks should quit while you're behind and give up on your insane bullshit before you make it ALL false.
.
Yeah why go through all the bother of verification when you can just "report"?
After all vast swaths of stupid fucks will still take the story as fact after you've told them that it was based on unsubstantiated nonsense.
Ahh... poor Dave, stuck your foot in your big mouth yet again and now you're all pissed off at those of us that told you your OP story was bullshit from the get go.Go fuck yourself
Because banks profit when their borrowers go bankruptYeah ... because profit could not possibly have motivated the bank.More whining?That was a lot of whining...yet you forgot to give any good reason why this would not make sense. Because, of course, you uave no good reason, and it makes perfect sense.Except...he still hasn't said he doesn't believe the report, or that it is false.
It's probably true.
ROFLMAO! Apparently MSNBC and O'Donnell weren't aware that you actually had to vet stories BEFORE airing them... OOPS.
I looked up gullible in the dictionary and it said "see Fort Fun Indiana", it never ceases to amaze me the amount of bullshit you hyper-partisan lemmings will happily swallow just to feed your confirmation bias.
Believung something like that to likely be true does not make one gullible.
LOL, What happened, the big words befuddle you again?
I realize that in the hyper-partisan fantasy world that you exist in things like verification and due diligence don't mean anything and all that counts is someone feeding your confirmation bias and enabling the cognitive dissonance that is your stock & trade; but out here in the REAL WORLD they actually form the basis of credibility and reputation and those that ignore them get mocked and marginalized... just like what is happening to You, MSNBC and O'Donnell right now.
I think this report to be likely true, as it explains the very odd lending behavior of deutsche bank.
Address that, or just whine. Your call.
Even you must know by now that you are an IDIOT, right?
