Trump's Response To Michelle Obama Failed DNC Convention Attack: 'I would not be President if it wasn't for your husband!'

[bendog]

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

But Trump said it because its what he believes. He's been doing the same variation on the these views since the 1970s. He's a bigot.

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

it didn't have anything to do with Obama personally.

 

[Faun]

And Obama had to pay interest on the debt he inherited. Just like Impeached Trump does; just like his successor will. Only Impeached Trump is adding debt at faster rate than even Obama had done...

You know what's funny (and, in a way, pretty fuckin' pathetic)? Your continued use of "impeached Trump" as if it means anything.

It doesn't.

You know means something? "MAGA" means something. You know what it means??

View attachment 376523

He was acquitted, just as impeached Clinton was...

LOL

I never said he wasn't acquitted. That doesn't mean he wasn't impeached. In fact, so far, every impeached president has been acquitted. Regardless, Impeached Trump is now the third president to be impeached. For all time in America, whenever a U.S. president is impeached, Impeached Trump's name will be mentioned. Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

 

[Canon Shooter]

The most racist thing happening in our country today is the lefts weaponization of race.

They can attempt to weaponize it all they want. I'm "weaponizing" my AR-15's, shotguns, numerous handguns and long rifles for the impending war, as are my friends and neighbors. I live in an affluent golf course community; the kind of place that the negroes down on West King wish they could have. The difference between us is that I have no problem working hard for what I have. They want it given to them, for no other reason that I have it and they don't.

Sooner or later they're going to decide they should come and take it from me. I can't imagine me being more welcoming of anything...

 

[Gaeandilth]

And Obama had to pay interest on the debt he inherited. Just like Impeached Trump does; just like his successor will. Only Impeached Trump is adding debt at faster rate than even Obama had done...

You know what's funny (and, in a way, pretty fuckin' pathetic)? Your continued use of "impeached Trump" as if it means anything.

It doesn't.

You know means something? "MAGA" means something. You know what it means??

View attachment 376523

He was acquitted, just as impeached Clinton was...

LOL

I never said he wasn't acquitted. That doesn't mean he wasn't impeached. In fact, so far, every impeached president has been acquitted. Regardless, Impeached Trump is now the third president to be impeached. For all time in America, whenever a U.S. president is impeached, Impeached Trump's name will be mentioned. Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

Obviously it does. Clinton still running around with power going to meet the AG to help his wife. But right after that flying out to Epstein's island to get his freek on. Hell his wife even got to run for president. SO much for your dirty hands theory.

 

[Faun]

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

Then you must've been downright apoplectic when Biden announced he would pick a moan of color to be his running mate. After all, all he did with the issue of a running mate was reduce it to be about skin color.

It's the exact same thing, although I strongly suspect your innate hypocrisy won't permit you to acknowledge that...

I heard him say this...

"Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender, but I'm not making that commitment until I know that the person I'm dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page."​

And no, that's not the same as saying blacks won't get elected president for generations because Impeached Trump thinks America's first black president failed.

Biden reduced his selection criteria down to skin color and gender. Period. How do we know this? Well, look at who he picked.

And you're a fucking hypocrite...

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

 

[Gaeandilth]

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

Then you must've been downright apoplectic when Biden announced he would pick a moan of color to be his running mate. After all, all he did with the issue of a running mate was reduce it to be about skin color.

It's the exact same thing, although I strongly suspect your innate hypocrisy won't permit you to acknowledge that...

I heard him say this...

"Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender, but I'm not making that commitment until I know that the person I'm dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page."​

And no, that's not the same as saying blacks won't get elected president for generations because Impeached Trump thinks America's first black president failed.

Biden reduced his selection criteria down to skin color and gender. Period. How do we know this? Well, look at who he picked.

And you're a fucking hypocrite...

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

Now explain to me how that tweet from trump was more racists then "If you do not vote for me or a democrat you ain't black" I mean that is almost a classic racist phrase just about politics instead of types of food. Or how there is no diversity in the black community? Or his voting record in the 60s? I mean you like to claim trump's racism but you even better at denying your god damn own.
I mean the entire democrat party is in denial. Who is it that is the very cause of racism in the first place? Who owned slaves? Who started the KKK? Who interned americans in WW2 based on the color of their skin or their heritage? You see their motivation in tearing down statues and trying to rewrite history. Because EVERY thing they are embarrassed of and hate America for was done by THEM.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

He said "preferably". Well, when you consider the fact that he was the guy who was making the choice, "preferably" is pretty much a certainty. If I say "I'm going out to dinner with friends tonight; preferably for a filet mignon", and I'm the one picking the restaurant, are you stupid enough to think there's a chance I'm not going to pick a steakhouse?

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

It's not a racist comment.

But, of course, being the obedient, boot-licking liberal that you are, you're going to say that it is because that's the narrative that the idiot left needs to have out there.

But just know that the rest of us are laughing at you...

 

[Faun]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And how many people talked about it in the interim?

I'll wait while you look up the word "interim"...

 

[Faun]

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

Then you must've been downright apoplectic when Biden announced he would pick a moan of color to be his running mate. After all, all he did with the issue of a running mate was reduce it to be about skin color.

It's the exact same thing, although I strongly suspect your innate hypocrisy won't permit you to acknowledge that...

I heard him say this...

"Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender, but I'm not making that commitment until I know that the person I'm dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page."​

And no, that's not the same as saying blacks won't get elected president for generations because Impeached Trump thinks America's first black president failed.

Biden reduced his selection criteria down to skin color and gender. Period. How do we know this? Well, look at who he picked.

And you're a fucking hypocrite...

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

Now explain to me how that tweet from trump was more racists then "If you do not vote for me or a democrat you ain't black" I mean that is almost a classic racist phrase just about politics instead of types of food. Or how there is no diversity in the black community? Or his voting record in the 60s? I mean you like to claim trump's racism but you even better at denying your god damn own.
I mean the entire democrat party is in denial. Who is it that is the very cause of racism in the first place? Who owned slaves? Who started the KKK? Who interned americans in WW2 based on the color of their skin or their heritage? You see their motivation in tearing down statues and trying to rewrite history. Because EVERY thing they are embarrassed of and hate America for was done by THEM.

No, that too was racist. As far as your diatribe about Democrats being historically the party of racism, it's really the conservative south you speak of. Back then, they were mostly Democrats. Democrats in the north did not share their racist views. That finally split in the 1940's when the racist Democrats splintered off and tried starting their own Dixiecrat party. But still, in tne conservative south.

 

[Faun]

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

He said "preferably". Well, when you consider the fact that he was the guy who was making the choice, "preferably" is pretty much a certainty. If I say "I'm going out to dinner with friends tonight; preferably for a filet mignon", and I'm the one picking the restaurant, are you stupid enough to think there's a chance I'm not going to pick a steakhouse?

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

It's not a racist comment.

But, of course, being the obedient, boot-licking liberal that you are, you're going to say that it is because that's the narrative that the idiot left needs to have out there.

But just know that the rest of us are laughing at you...

It was only a "certainty" to you because your feeble brain can't fathon, "prefer."

 

[Faun]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And how many people talked about it in the interim?

I'll wait while you look up the word "interim"...

I wouldn't know as I don't keep score.

 

[berg80]

Wow. Michelle absolutely buried the Orange Turd. Now, like the petulant child he is, who can not refute the essential point of her message.............that Trump is in over his head...............he's crying like the whiny little bitch he is.

 

[Gaeandilth]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And that is a negative why? Shit most you people do not even know who Andrew Johnson was. And damn sure would not know he was a racist democrat and was impeached because of that racism. Probably never even knew yourself till the Trump impeachment that he was impeached. Because unless you went to school before the indoctrination of our education system they probably did not teach you this.

 

[Gaeandilth]

All they consider is his getting tv bitch slapped by a former first lady whom he has repeatedly insulted with racial slurs.

Look at the number of people who voted for Obama compared to the number who voted for Trump

Obama would have destroyed Trump in an election

In the fantasy land that is your head, perhaps.

But the real world being what it is and all, what Obama may or may not have done is meaningless...

The numbers don’t lie.
Obama got eight million more votes than Trump

So what? In what way does that have bearing on anything?

It's ignorant and stupid to pretend it means anything, simply because there's no way to know. Obama never ran against someone like Trump. Hell, maybe Obama would've gotten more than 8 million more votes.

But it's equally possible that he would've gotten less.

Either way, trying to make a point with this is stupid. You should really stop trying...

It means something because Trump raised the issue.

Obama legitimately won the popular vote and remains much more popular than Trump

It eats Trump up

Criticism by a female eats trump up, and a black female to boot. And one who can use "better words" than he. I don't think anything can garner him a single female vote that isn't already decided for him, absent some coronavirus vaccine or economic miracle … or Bill Barr launching a November surprise … which I suspect is in the works.

Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama. And he did pretty well against Hillary Clinton. Did not seem to eat him up from her criticism in fact he handled her pretty well. And I hope there is a Nov or earlier surprise because there are a LOT of Democrats that deserve to face justice that have beyond a reasonable doubt FAR more obvious then a single thing you people claim Trump did. And Biden the media has been so soft on him there is still no excuse for Hunter Biden and Joe's involvement in it. Only thing they have offered to refute the claims is his denial. And we already know all democrats are in denial naturally.

"Show me a single racial slur Trump has said to anyone much less to Michelle Obama."

Easy...

"Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won't see another black president for generations!" ~ Impeached Trump​

So, referring to a black man as "black" is now a racist slur?

You pathetic little fucks are sure reachin'...

No, making it about the color of his skin, there won't be another "black president for generations."

You may now remove your lips from Impeached Trump's weenis.

You do understand that it's possible to talk about someone's race without it being racist, correct?

Or are you just stupid?

These democrats need to look up the definition of RACISM anyway. Calling someone a name even if it is a slur in itself is not racist. If that was so every Call of Duty kid in the world is a racist. I mean everyone called something that was boring and uninteresting "gay" back in the 80s does that make everyone a homophobe?
Now Nominating a VP based on her sex and skin color is racist. I mean if Trump's reason for hiring Pence was because he was a white male and it was clear that was the reason would not everyone think that was racist?

LOLOL

The Impeached Trump sycophancy runs quite deep among the right. Yes, using a slur against someone based on the color of their skin is indeed racist, ya 5th Avenuer.

So, you really are stupid? Okay.

Referring to a black man as a black man is not a racial slur. If it is, I'll just start blacks "porch monkeys" because, well, it's more flashy.

You probably believe that using skin color in the description of a criminal is racist, as well, right?

An excellent point has been brought up, and it proves Biden is a racist fuck. He had no concern about picking someone who might actually be qualified and well-suited to the job. Biden has no business being President, simply because he doesn't want what's best for this country. He doesn't want the most qualified person to be Vice President. He wants a negro gash.

As for Trump's comments about Obama, he's absolutely correct, and no one here has come close to explaining how he isn't...

Saying blacks won't get elected president because Obama failed, is racist. He reduced it to be about the color of their skin.

Then you must've been downright apoplectic when Biden announced he would pick a moan of color to be his running mate. After all, all he did with the issue of a running mate was reduce it to be about skin color.

It's the exact same thing, although I strongly suspect your innate hypocrisy won't permit you to acknowledge that...

I heard him say this...

"Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender, but I'm not making that commitment until I know that the person I'm dealing with I can completely and thoroughly trust as authentic and on the same page."​

And no, that's not the same as saying blacks won't get elected president for generations because Impeached Trump thinks America's first black president failed.

Biden reduced his selection criteria down to skin color and gender. Period. How do we know this? Well, look at who he picked.

And you're a fucking hypocrite...

Except he didn't. He did say he would prefer a woman of color but had not committed to that unless he felt such a person was qualified.

Of course, I'm saying this to a person defending a racist comment about how our first black president is responsible for no other black to be elected president for generations to come.

Now explain to me how that tweet from trump was more racists then "If you do not vote for me or a democrat you ain't black" I mean that is almost a classic racist phrase just about politics instead of types of food. Or how there is no diversity in the black community? Or his voting record in the 60s? I mean you like to claim trump's racism but you even better at denying your god damn own.
I mean the entire democrat party is in denial. Who is it that is the very cause of racism in the first place? Who owned slaves? Who started the KKK? Who interned americans in WW2 based on the color of their skin or their heritage? You see their motivation in tearing down statues and trying to rewrite history. Because EVERY thing they are embarrassed of and hate America for was done by THEM.

No, that too was racist. As far as your diatribe about Democrats being historically the party of racism, it's really the conservative south you speak of. Back then, they were mostly Democrats. Democrats in the north did not share their racist views. That finally split in the 1940's when the racist Democrats splintered off and tried starting their own Dixiecrat party. But still, in tne conservative south.

No the democrats that stayed in the north did so because they were in power and did not want to lose that power(dems today would do the same). Andrew Johnson was one of them as i stated earlier. And in the 40s to 60s the democrats did not split on being racist. They split on how they would achieve their racist agenda. And the modern Democrat has proven that their faction had the best strategy(and most of the ones that split came running right back).

 

[Canon Shooter]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And how many people talked about it in the interim?

I'll wait while you look up the word "interim"...

I wouldn't know as I don't keep score.

No, you don't know because you're either too stupid or too big a coward to discuss it.

My Dad was born in 1933, some 65 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1933, no one was talking about Johnson's impeachment.

I was born in 1962, which was 94 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1962, no one was too caught up in Johnson's impeachment.

You know when people started talking about Johnson's impeachment? 1998, when Bill Clinton was impeached.

The fact that someone was impeached is no more meaningful than they were accused of speeding...

 

[bendog]

It is what it is. (-:

 

[Gaeandilth]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And how many people talked about it in the interim?

I'll wait while you look up the word "interim"...

I wouldn't know as I don't keep score.

No, you don't know because you're either too stupid or too big a coward to discuss it.

My Dad was born in 1933, some 65 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1933, no one was talking about Johnson's impeachment.

I was born in 1962, which was 94 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1962, no one was too caught up in Johnson's impeachment.

You know when people started talking about Johnson's impeachment? 1998, when Bill Clinton was impeached.

The fact that someone was impeached is no more meaningful than they were accused of speeding...

Well he was talked about during Nixon too. Dems were happy as clams during the nixon too. They had a free election they could pick whoever they want to do exactly whatever they wanted to to improve the country omg we finally going to do something substantial!!!!!! Then they elect Jimmy Carter LOL 1 term do nothing president followed by 12 years straight of republican rule that grew the US, Seen the fastest technological advances seen since the industrial boom, ended the cold war and won it. Among many other accomplishments. And being older like me you also seen this Trump hate before to a bit lesser degree in Regan. Oh how the dems hated him. Yet he stole so many dems from their party.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Just like the impeached presidents before him. Impeachment is a stain that never washes away.

It simply means he faced charges. Nothing more, nothing less.

Do you refer to everyone who's ever been charged with a crime as a "suspected criminal"? Of course you don't, because that would be stupid. Just as it's stupid to refer to a President who's been impeached as "impeached insert name here.

Bottom line is that the fact that he was impeached is, at this point, utterly meaningless. But don't worry, you're going to have four more years of bitching about how your President was impeached...

LOLOL

It's so "meanless," Johnson's impeachment was still talked about during Impeached Trump's impeachment. And that was 150 years ago.

And how many people talked about it in the interim?

I'll wait while you look up the word "interim"...

I wouldn't know as I don't keep score.

No, you don't know because you're either too stupid or too big a coward to discuss it.

My Dad was born in 1933, some 65 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1933, no one was talking about Johnson's impeachment.

I was born in 1962, which was 94 years after Johnson was impeached. I use this just as an example because, in 1962, no one was too caught up in Johnson's impeachment.

You know when people started talking about Johnson's impeachment? 1998, when Bill Clinton was impeached.

The fact that someone was impeached is no more meaningful than they were accused of speeding...

Well he was talked about during Nixon too. Dems were happy as clams during the nixon too. They had a free election they could pick whoever they want to do exactly whatever they wanted to to improve the country omg we finally going to do something substantial!!!!!! Then they elect Jimmy Carter LOL 1 term do nothing president followed by 12 years straight of republican rule that grew the US, Seen the fastest technological advances seen since the industrial boom, ended the cold war and won it. Among many other accomplishments. And being older like me you also seen this Trump hate before to a bit lesser degree in Regan. Oh how the dems hated him. Yet he stole so many dems from their party.

Yeah, but Nixon's resignation ended any impeachment discussion...