TV Station "Newsmax" CANCELS on Dinesh after his new Film 2000 Mules turns out to be Junk

So what you mean is you know the election was stolen but it cannot be proven. We know you could care less about this country because you confirm it daily.
If it can’t be proven then you can’t know it happened. You can only believe… maybe next December you and Santa Claus can discuss over some milk and cookies
 
It does indeed show proof of massive election tampering.

And that's what has you Leftrolls melting down. ANYONE seeing this knows it's factual and shows massive election fraud.

Decent people will demand action to create integrity in our elections. And we all know that free and fair elections are a death knell to your Reich. Without fraud, you don't win - period.

7 states with election integrity now. 11 more with pending legislation - this just strengthens the demand for honest elections. Other states will follow.

You democrats are fucked. :thup:
Riiiight it shows massive election tampering but you can’t describe exactly what that is. The only way to know is to watch the video. And when somebody who has watched the video shoots down your claims you go dark. Grow up.
 
Stuffing a ballot box has specific meaning.

Loading the box with votes from voters, who did not vote.
“[Kemp] led a fight alright - against us,” Catherine said. “I personally briefed Kemp's team,” added Gregg. “They not only refused [to investigate]… they sent one of their henchmen, the guy that runs the GBI, down to the FBI office where our data lived — not to see the data, but to get into the metadata and figure out who the analysts were and then burn me and a couple of my analysts,” Gregg explained. “Releasing it all to the press... They did everything they could to stop us,” Catherine said.
You have to prove the ballots stuffed, were not from legal voters.

YOU have no proof ballot boxes of mail boxes for that manner were stuffed with votes that individual registered voters, never made.

Have you done that? NO!

If you ever do, you'll have a case, to be brought, even this late, in the contest.....

But, as shown, YOU DONT.
“[Kemp] led a fight alright - against us,” Catherine said. “I personally briefed Kemp's team,” added Gregg. “They not only refused [to investigate]… they sent one of their henchmen, the guy that runs the GBI, down to the FBI office where our data lived — not to see the data, but to get into the metadata and figure out who the analysts were and then burn me and a couple of my analysts,” Gregg explained. “Releasing it all to the press... They did everything they could to stop us,” Catherine said.


What about that? No corruption? What are they hiding?

 
You lied that you saw the film. IF ballot harvesting were illegal, you have dozens of prosecutable cases.

But of course your just flinging shit, and like everything you post it has no basis in fact.

Ballot Harvesting is legal and encouraged in states like California, where Reich operatives request ballots for comatose and other incapacitated people and vote in their names - for democrats.

You didn't watch the film, as always you're a lying blowhard.
Ballot harvesting is only illegal in one state and it’s not the state in question. What crimes do you have proof of being committed?
 
Riiiight it shows massive election tampering but you can’t describe exactly what that is. The only way to know is to watch the video. And when somebody who has watched the video shoots down your claims you go dark. Grow up.
Massive tampering is alright with you? The country is being destroyed because of that massive tampering.
 
No worries, the link isn't what she claims.

Join their club and they will let you watch it.

It ain't free - no matter how much you Nazis lie.

LOLOLOL

Holy shit, are you ever rightarded. Moron, signing up is also free. Anyone can watch it on that site for free. And BTW, that's not even the site I watched it on. The site I went to doesn't require anyone sign up, though they do offer that option.
 
The phone pings are proof those people were there. What else would they be doing? What do you think they were doing, hanging out. You dumbass.

LOLOL

Imbecile...

"Were there" is not proof of dropping off ballots. That's why the video matching the pings was crucial to them proving their case.

Like you, they failed miserably.
 
LOLOL

Imbecile...

"Were there" is not proof of dropping off ballots. That's why the video matching the pings was crucial to them proving their case.

Like you, they failed miserably.
Again, if this were evidence against Trump or his supporters you would have them in jail. Do not even try to deny it.
 
And that's what has you Leftrolls melting down. ANYONE seeing this knows it's factual and shows massive election fraud.
Actually we are just dumb founded and gob smacked by your lack of the ability to discern fact from fiction, your inability to logically follow scenarios through, while earnestly swallowing bull shit you're fed as facts from your handlers, if it is what you want to hear....
 
Hey stupid, tell us again how California only allows family members to harvest ballots? Then lie about it after you're proven wrong, then try and change the subject.

clown-juggling.gif

Why do you get mad at me because you're s moron?? In California, which is not included in the movie anyway, any voter who can't drop off their own ballot may ask anyone they wish to drop off their ballot for them, without compensation. Anything beyond that is illegal..


§ 3017

2) A vote by mail voter who is unable to return the ballot may designate another person to return the ballot to the elections official who issued the ballot, to the precinct board at a polling place or vote center within the state, or to a vote by mail ballot dropoff location within the state that is provided pursuant to Section 3025 or 4005 .  The person designated shall return the ballot in person, or put the ballot in the mail, no later than three days after receiving it from the voter or before the close of the polls on election day, whichever time period is shorter.  Notwithstanding subdivision (d), a ballot shall not be disqualified from being counted solely because it was returned or mailed more than three days after the designated person received it from the voter, provided that the ballot is returned by the designated person before the close of polls on election day. ...

(e)(1) A person designated to return a vote by mail ballot shall not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person returns and an individual, group, or organization shall not provide compensation on this basis.

(2) For purposes of this paragraph, “compensation” means any form of monetary payment, goods, services, benefits, promises or offers of employment, or any other form of consideration offered to another person in exchange for returning another voter's vote by mail ballot.

(3) A person in charge of a vote by mail ballot and who knowingly and willingly engages in criminal acts related to that ballot as described in Division 18 (commencing with Section 18000 ), including, but not limited to, fraud, bribery, intimidation, and tampering with or failing to deliver the ballot in a timely fashion, is subject to the appropriate punishment specified in that division
 

Forum List

Back
Top