TV Station "Newsmax" CANCELS on Dinesh after his new Film 2000 Mules turns out to be Junk

[Lastamender]

I don't need evidence that the election was secure. As a good American I respect the system and institution that has been operational and electing our presidents since our counties inception.

Since we are back to the “wait and see” like I predicted days ago, we can confidently say that you are full of shit and have failed in another debate. Thanks for playing

There is not one good reason to respect those in government. It is not a duty when they are destroying the country.

 

[meaner gene]

There will be posts until it is accepted there was fraud. Millions more think there was fraud now, and anyone who sees the film will join them. Game over.

This reminds me of how George W. Bush "pushed the propaganda" and continued to repeat the lies about WMD's in Iraq until the majority of Americans believed not only did Saddam have WMD's but was responsible for 9-11.

 

[Lastamender]

He doesn't realize that evidence on a court of law is based on actual facts, not statistical probabilities.

Just because something is either likely or unlikely, doesn't prove it did or didn't happen.

The courts never even looked at those things, so you are talking out of your ass.

 

[Lastamender]

This reminds me of how George W. Bush "pushed the propaganda" and continued to repeat the lies about WMD's in Iraq until the majority of Americans believed not only did Saddam have WMD's but was responsible for 9-11.

Very similar to the safe secure election bullshit. You dumbass, thanks for help.

 

[Lesh]

The courts never even looked at those things, so you are talking out of your ass.

Because as noted...courts deal in FACTS no probabilities

Dumbass

 

[Lastamender]

Because as noted...courts deal in FACTS no probabilities

Dumbass

The reason is no evidentiary hearings, idiot.

 

[meaner gene]

The courts never even looked at those things, so you are talking out of your ass.

A federal judge specifically looked at all the affidavits the Trump lawyers presented, and sanctioned them because none of them were worthy of being submitted to a federal court. They stated no actual facts, and instead were hearsay, rumors, and suspicions. No actual evidence.

 

[meaner gene]

Very similar to the safe secure election bullshit. You dumbass, thanks for help.

And like Iraq, after two years of looking for either fraud or WMD's, they were unable to find any.

At least in Iraq they gave up after it became obvious they were wrong.

 

[Lastamender]

And like Iraq, after two years of looking for either fraud or WMD's, they were unable to find any.

At least in Iraq they gave up after it became obvious they were wrong.

Like we have found out that the 2020 was neither safe or secure? Another thing that was more, much more, than obvious. Still helping, huh?

 

[meaner gene]

The reason is no evidentiary hearings, idiot.

An evidentiary hearing is when you cross examine evidence already presented to the court (affidavits). The court already ruled that the affidavits contained no actual evidence, hence no need to hold a hearing to cross examine.

 

[Lastamender]

An evidentiary hearing is when you cross examine evidence already presented to the court (affidavits). The court already ruled that the affidavits contained no actual evidence, hence no need to hold a hearing to cross examine.

The court cannot do that because affidavits are not evidence until they are presented in a hearing. That never happened. Stop lying.

 

[meaner gene]

The court cannot do that because affidavits are not evidence until they are presented in a hearing. That never happened. Stop lying.

Loading…

www.uscourts.gov

(1) Supporting Factual Positions. A party asserting that a fact
cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion
by:
(A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record,
including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or
(B) showing that the materials cited do not establish the
absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support
the fact

(4) Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or declaration used
to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal
knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence,
and show that the affiant

 

[Winco]

There will be posts until it is accepted there was fraud. Millions more think there was fraud now, and anyone who sees the film will join them. Game over.

Well you are playing a game of Tic-Tac-Toe and in that game you should NEVER lose.

You are finding a way to actually LOSE at TTT.

As expected.
But keep claiming victory when you haven’t won shit. Genius.

 

[beagle9]

Everyone but the most devout sheep know the movie is total horse crap.

When something is too much BS for even NewsMax that is a very bad sign.

Big fan of Newsmax now are you ? Of course you are Mr. bandwagon jumper..

 

[meaner gene]

FRCP Rule 56

(h) AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION SUBMITTED IN BAD FAITH. If satisfied that an affidavit or declaration under this rule is submitted in bad faith or solely for delay, the court—after notice and a reasonable time to respond—may order the submitting party to pay the other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees,
it incurred as a result. An offending party or attorney may also
be held in contempt or subjected to other appropriate sanctions.


A federal judge sanctioned the Trump attorneys for this violation.

No evidentiary hearing an be held on affidavits already tossed out under Rule 56

 

[Lastamender]

Loading…

www.uscourts.gov

(1) Supporting Factual Positions. A party asserting that a fact
cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion
by:
(A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record,
including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or
(B) showing that the materials cited do not establish the
absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support
the fact

(4) Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or declaration used
to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal
knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence,
and show that the affiant

Where is the rest of it?

 

[Lastamender]

Well you are playing a game of Tic-Tac-Toe and in that game you should NEVER lose.

You are finding a way to actually LOSE at TTT.

As expected.
But keep claiming victory when you haven’t won shit. Genius.

Same thing you are doing, Einstein.

 

[meaner gene]

Well you are playing a game of Tic-Tac-Toe and in that game you should NEVER lose.

You are finding a way to actually LOSE at TTT.

As expected.
But keep claiming victory when you haven’t won shit. Genius.

He says there was no evidentiary hearings. Which is true, since the judges already ruled the affidavits submitted weren't evidence (contained no actual facts)

 

[Lastamender]

He says there was no evidentiary hearings. Which is true, since the judges already ruled the affidavits submitted weren't evidence (contained no actual facts)

Then how is evidence presented? So your court excuse is a joke. Keep digging.

 

[meaner gene]

Where is the rest of it?

You have the link.

If you think the remaining 139 pages show something different, post it.