Twatter deal is everyone good with this

Owning shares is different than owning the owner.
So, the prince owns Musk? Seriously, that is what you are going with.
If that is the case, then why didn't the prince want Musk to own Twitter in the first place?
If the prince did own Musk, then why didn't the prince tell Musk not to buy it and Musk would have had to back off?
This is just political BS, big government interfering in private industry just based on politics. No other real answer.
 
So, the prince owns Musk? Seriously, that is what you are going with.
If that is the case, then why didn't the prince want Musk to own Twitter in the first place?
If the prince did own Musk, then why didn't the prince tell Musk not to buy it and Musk would have had to back off?
OP obviously is not the sharpest marble in the bag.

Good luck with trying to get him to do logic.
 
Otto, sweetie -- does that 105 in your user name refer to your weight? It certainly can't refer to your IQ as it does with Berg and several others.

In any case, the leftists here sure do hate the liberal principle of free speech, don't they folks?
 
Then C_Clayton_Jones why didn't Democrats want to explore the prince's influence under the previous Twitter ownership? Why was the prince against Musk buying Twitter in the first place? If anyone is being dishonest here, it is you.
He owned how much stock?

Now he owns the owner.
 
Otto, sweetie -- does that 105 in your user name refer to your weight? It certainly can't refer to your IQ as it does with Berg and several others.

In any case, the leftists here sure do hate the liberal principle of free speech, don't they folks?
Free speech as maga fuckup practice it is a hell scape.
 
Otto, sweetie -- does that 105 in your user name refer to your weight? It certainly can't refer to your IQ as it does with Berg and several others.

In any case, the leftists here sure do hate the liberal principle of free speech, don't they folks?
Aw, an attempt to be maga funny.


Sorry honey, not impressed.
 
I don't really care, the Prince owned shares before Elon Musk bought the company and actually is on record of being against the buyout, now we have a political motivated investigation, why didn't Democrats worry about the Prince's interest before? All BS, government intervention into a private company because of the new owners politics. If this was Gates the Democrats would have done not a damn thing.


It's just an investment to bin Talal.
 
Considering the questions about TikTok.


U.S. exploring whether it has authority to review Musk’s Twitter deal — The Washington Post


I wonder if maga loving fuckups want the Saudi prince looking at their personal data.
/——-/ And just like that, libtards are worried about privacy.
FFC59170-E51E-439F-8EB0-8C4E2DF73F97.jpeg
 
So, the prince owns Musk? Seriously, that is what you are going with.
If that is the case, then why didn't the prince want Musk to own Twitter in the first place?
If the prince did own Musk, then why didn't the prince tell Musk not to buy it and Musk would have had to back off?
This is just political BS, big government interfering in private industry just based on politics. No other real answer.

Bin Talal thought the price was too low. Do you actually care about Twitter?
 
It's just an investment to bin Talal.
Tell that to Otto, the Senator is only wanting an investigation because of politics, that is it. It is wrong to use political leverage to go after a person you politcally disagree with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top