Uh Wait we are at 30,000 Deaths, what happened to 200K minimum WITH mitigation?

[jbander]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

 

[jbander]

the fun part is he lied , this same lie 291 times

How many times have you claimed the now proven lie, 17k?

There is more then just one source keeping track of your pile of shit lies

 

[WEATHER53]

Jbander likes to suffer and wants everybody else to.

 

[Correll]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

Lying requires intent to deceive. Trump is a well know bullshitter and such an obviously bullshit statement was not seriously meant to mislead anyone.

Your list is a lie, and you know it.

 

[Correll]

the fun part is he lied , this same lie 291 times

How many times have you claimed the now proven lie, 17k?

There is more then just one source keeping track of your pile of shit lies

HOw do you know that I am not just honestly wrong?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

4,000 people died today.

people have been dying everyday for decades

and yet you are still here.
You really are a dumb fuck.

Temper tantrum alert.

 

[jbander]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

You don't get it , I posted the first one and it its definately a lie , the only thing you can do is prove it false, so there's the lie and the reason why it is a lie. He either didn't say it or the facts of the proof that it is a law is false. So show us what you got and bring your source, we really aren't interested in your opinion. I mean thats the point of this, showing how worthless your opinion is.

 

[jbander]

Everyone the one he says isn't a lie is at post 135.

 

[Correll]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

You don't get it , I posted the first one and it its definately a lie , the only thing you can do is prove it false, so there's the lie and the reason why it is a lie. He either didn't say it or the facts of the proof that it is a law is false. So show us what you got and bring your source, we really aren't interested in your opinion. I mean thats the point of this, showing how worthless your opinion is.

Your pretense of not knowing that hyperbole exists as an alternative, is not credible. You are lying.

 

[Nostra]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Most of us aren't saying that Covid-19 isn't real, what we are saying is that it has already been proven that the bureaucrats inside the CDC are politicizing this particular disease for an agenda.

This IS A FACT. They will code deaths that they do not know for postive have anything to do with Covid-19, as Covid deaths.

From the CDC itself.

Hospitals Get Paid More to List Patients as COVID-19 and Three Times as Much if the Patient Goes on Ventilator (VIDEO)

THIS IS HUGE! Last night Senator Dr. Scott Jensen from Minnesota went on The Ingraham Angle to discuss how the AMA is encouraging American doctors to overcount coronavirus deaths across the US. This was after Dr. Scott Jensen, a Minnesota physician and Republican state senator, told a local stat ...

thespectator.info

Crapola , the numbers of deaths are way higher, the number of people who are sick from this are way higher , both numbers are derived from whether they have tested positive for this virus but you can't get tested. Even when you are diagnosed with it at the doctors or at the hospital emergency room , they don't/can\t test you because they have just a couple of test hanging around. The death number is kept low because that is what scum bag your dictator dictates , He needs these low numbers so he doesn't look like a total idiot and he needs them to get elected , The push to start the economy is all votes, and these minor league's in the right wing thinks that he is telling the truth, and that he never lies.

Simmer down, Cupcake.

 

[jbander]

Jbander likes to suffer and wants everybody else to.

ah what?????

 

[jbander]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

You don't get it , I posted the first one and it its definately a lie , the only thing you can do is prove it false, so there's the lie and the reason why it is a lie. He either didn't say it or the facts of the proof that it is a law is false. So show us what you got and bring your source, we really aren't interested in your opinion. I mean thats the point of this, showing how worthless your opinion is.

Your pretense of not knowing that hyperbole exists as an alternative, is not credible. You are lying.

There is no alternative Hyperbole is lying , hyper boil is not telling the truth and in his case it always has a reason, it's to puff up this puss ball.

 

[jbander]

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

Idiot liberals will say "BECAUSE THE DISTANCING WORKED!" So the upper estimates of 1 million dead, even 2, did not come to pass. But Fauci in press briefings 3 weeks ago always included "with mitigation." That means social distancing was baked into those numbers. But don't count on liberals to be able to process all that. And Fauci has changed the dead estimate to 60,000, a bad flu season, many hospitals are empty, and the real mortality rate keeps going down even as more and more mild or asymptomatic cases are tested, inflation of COVID19 numbers emerges.

Now we have a wrecked economy, decades old small businesses that will never come back, and cities ready to blow. On to phase 2.

On the other hand, the One Percent has people accustomed to locking themselves in their cells, and once the looting and pillaging starts, they will be begging for shoot on sight orders for anyone outside after curfew. These people are under control. Meanwhile they are partying like it's 1999 in their mansions with swimming pools. No problem "hunkering down."

That's a heck of a two months of work. Hats off to a formidable enemy.

Could you please with evidence tell us how many would have died if your route was taken?

He made a serious claim about 200k WITH mitigation. If the model was that wrong, that is a point that needs discussed.

Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

That "crap" is the thread topic. If you did not want to discuss it, then you should not have entered the thread.


Do you even know if he claim is correct? If it is, that seems pretty shocking, would you not agree?

Yes I know, the crap I pointed out is because it is crap. and it is total bullshit compared to scum bag saying there is nothing to it/ So we will try one more time ----Forget this crap, scum bag said zero for deaths but the haters are attack other numbers. When stuidity and lies are your only answer do them both big time. Just like the screaming carrot. 17000 verified lies in 3 years , that number will never be topped.

17k lies is a lie. Nice irony there. You immediately show that your supposed complaint, ie lying, is not a problem for you, so your entire complaint is bullshit.

You people are so easy to make a total fool out of , here are all the lies and all the reasons why they are considered lies , there is now 18,000 of them, find a 1000 that they made a mistake on and they are not lies. and bring the proof. Lets start with just one. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_4 We are all waiting for your words of wisdom now and your proof

The first one is not a lie. It was harmless hyperbole, obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

That you would seriously try to deceive me, by counting it as a lie, is ironically ACTUALLY a lie. You are lying. Trump was just talking some shit, like he is prone to do.

Here's the first one THAT OUR EXPERT HERE POINTED OUT AS BEING NOT A LIE.



HERE IS THE LIE AND WHY IT IS A LIE.
“Again, we had the strongest economy in the world. We had our best ever. We had probably the best economy in the history of the world, bigger than China, bigger than anybody.”
Fact Check:
Trump normally just claims he once had the best economy in the history of the United States but here he even claims it was best economy in the history of the world. But it's not true even for the U.S. Before the coronavirus pandemic shuttered businesses and sent unemployment soaring, the president could certainly brag about the state of the economy in his first three years as president. But he ran into trouble when he made a play for the history books. By just about any important measure, the economy under Trump did not do as well as it did under Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson or Bill Clinton. The gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent in 2019, slipping from 2.9 percent in 2018 and 2.4 percent in 2017. But in 1997, 1998 and 1999, GDP grew 4.5 percent, 4.5 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. Yet even that period paled in comparison against the 1950s and 1960s. Growth between 1962 and 1966 ranged from 4.4 percent to 6.6 percent. In postwar 1950 and 1951, it was 8.7 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate reached a low of 3.5 percent under Trump, but it dipped as low as 2.5 percent in 1953.
Repeated 291 times:

And not seriously intended to fool one person once.

So, not a lie. YOur list is refuted.

That one fails so try again.

You don't get it , I posted the first one and it its definately a lie , the only thing you can do is prove it false, so there's the lie and the reason why it is a lie. He either didn't say it or the facts of the proof that it is a law is false. So show us what you got and bring your source, we really aren't interested in your opinion. I mean thats the point of this, showing how worthless your opinion is.

Your pretense of not knowing that hyperbole exists as an alternative, is not credible. You are lying.

Post 135 says it all , my genious friend here says it isn't lying. Take a look.

 

[Rigby5]

I think Fauci is being optimistic with 60k dead...

Sorry this is pretty grim:
At the moment there is 2500 dying a day, 10% growth of dead a day
By that rate if 10% holds about 25k will die in the next 7 days. Other countries further down the line haven't moved much from the 10% growth a day.

If the US could get that to zero the following week that mean only another 25,000 people have died.

The following week with out a reversal of this (which only a very few countries have got there) you having 50,000 dying...

This is all built on testing that is half what they are doing in Germany and other European countries(who also have Universal Healthcare)...

Those numbers are painting a picture of 100k+ before this can even reach the apex.

Can the Unlock the country people tell us the cost of lives of their plan?

I am not sure, but the only thing a lock down does is slow the rate of infection, not the total. So as long as you have not over saturated the hospital ventilator supply, then you will have the same death toll, whether slowed or not.

 

[Rigby5]

The annual death toll in the US from ordinary flu is between 12,000 – 61,000 deaths, since 2010.

So far COVID-19 has had a US death toll of of 36,000.
Which means this was not even a bad year in terms of illness deaths.

 

[linux07]

 

[linux07]

 

[Issa]

4,000 people died today.

people have been dying everyday for decades

Typical trump supporter dont give a rat's ass about people dying.

Yeah we do. That's why we told you leftists not to make schools gun free zones.

The whole world has gun free zones, no .ass shootings. Where guns are available to the masses is where there are s hoop shootings.

 

[Nostra]

4,000 people died today.

people have been dying everyday for decades

Typical trump supporter dont give a rat's ass about people dying.

Yeah we do. That's why we told you leftists not to make schools gun free zones.

The whole world has gun free zones, no .ass shootings. Where guns are available to the masses is where there are s hoop shootings.

English, do you speak it?

 

[Issa]

4,000 people died today.

people have been dying everyday for decades

Typical trump supporter dont give a rat's ass about people dying.

..I care about you, Issa--and so does Mr Trump..he loves us

No he doesnt. He cares about his ego.