eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 69,504
- 34,561
I was talking damage control after the point of Russia claiming it was a fire.No, you misinterpreted my meaning when I said that. I was speculating on the possibility that no country has the ability to defend it's ships from a missile or missiles strike. The question has yet to be answered.
I have none on that particular question.
I'll also speculate on the question of whether Russia as equal or greater capability on damage control and equal or greater capability with anti-ship missile technology.
Those questions in the interest of hearing somebody who is qualified to answer? Unfortunately, my opinion is that nobody is yet qualified to answer.
We'll just have to rely on the necessity of a military mindset that even suggests that MAD isn't inevitable. The same applies for missile technology of a perceived enemy.
Good possibility for a discussion that might bring in some others!
In regards to qualified on damage control. It sure isnt you.