Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
His point is valid. When the sons & daughters of gun nutters get slaughtered by mass murderers whose easy access to guns assisted in their blood-soaked act, their attitude changes.
It's another version of "there are no atheists in fox holes".
Listen gun nutters. Australia, Canada and the UK all have strict gun control and far less gun violence. If we adopt some version of their laws, we will have less gun violence.
It's your fault that we have so much gun violence.
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
Prof says NRA members? children should be next to die in mass shooting | The Daily Caller
4:17 PM 09/19/2013
In the wake of the Navy Yard shooting, a journalism professor at the University of Kansas is calling for children of NRA members to be the next people killed in a mass shooting.
David Guth, an associate professor at UKs journalism school, took to Twitter to lay the blame for the Navy Yard shooting on the shoulders of NRA members. If anyone has to die in a mass shooting, it should be their children, he said.
#NavyYardShooting The blood is on the hands of the #NRA. Next time, let it be YOUR sons and daughters. Shame on you. May God damn you.
David Guth (@DWGuth) September 16, 2013
He later doubled down on his statements in an interview with Campus Reform.
Hell no, hell no, I do not regret that Tweet, he said. I dont take it back one bit."
Guth presided as an associate dean of UKs journalism school for five years. Campus Reform reported that the university was standing by his right to make such claims about NRA members and their children.
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Look at that....someone actually understands context
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Look at that....someone actually understands context
What does the NRA have to do with it?
-Geaux
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Look at that....someone actually understands context
What does the NRA have to do with it?
-Geaux
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
Prof says NRA members? children should be next to die in mass shooting | The Daily Caller
4:17 PM 09/19/2013
In the wake of the Navy Yard shooting, a journalism professor at the University of Kansas is calling for children of NRA members to be the next people killed in a mass shooting.
David Guth, an associate professor at UK’s journalism school, took to Twitter to lay the blame for the Navy Yard shooting on the shoulders of NRA members. If anyone has to die in a mass shooting, it should be their children, he said.
#NavyYardShooting The blood is on the hands of the #NRA. Next time, let it be YOUR sons and daughters. Shame on you. May God damn you.
— David Guth (@DWGuth) September 16, 2013
He later doubled down on his statements in an interview with Campus Reform.
“Hell no, hell no, I do not regret that Tweet,” he said. “I don’t take it back one bit."
Guth presided as an associate dean of UK’s journalism school for five years. Campus Reform reported that the university was standing by his right to make such claims about NRA members and their children.
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Mark Mattioli, whose six-year-old son, James, was killed in the December shooting, spoke during a NRA press conference on the pro-gun organization's new school safety proposals.
"I wanted to take a minute and applaud ... the NRA for coming up and spending the time and resources on putting a program like this together," Mattioli said. "We send our children off to school. There are certain expectations and obviously in Sandy Hook, those expectations were not met."
Look at that....someone actually understands context
What does the NRA have to do with it?
-Geaux
By NRA do you mean that organization that emphasizes gun safety and the joys of shooting sports or the organization that has a death grip on Congress to kill any gun legislation?
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Are you suggesting a child of an NRA member has never been affected by gun violence? Perhaps the gun violence suffered by children prompted the parents to join the NRA.
Mark Mattioli, whose six-year-old son, James, was killed in the December shooting, spoke during a NRA press conference on the pro-gun organization's new school safety proposals.
"I wanted to take a minute and applaud ... the NRA for coming up and spending the time and resources on putting a program like this together," Mattioli said. "We send our children off to school. There are certain expectations and obviously in Sandy Hook, those expectations were not met."
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Are you suggesting a child of an NRA member has never been affected by gun violence? Perhaps the gun violence suffered by children prompted the parents to join the NRA.
Mark Mattioli, whose six-year-old son, James, was killed in the December shooting, spoke during a NRA press conference on the pro-gun organization's new school safety proposals.
"I wanted to take a minute and applaud ... the NRA for coming up and spending the time and resources on putting a program like this together," Mattioli said. "We send our children off to school. There are certain expectations and obviously in Sandy Hook, those expectations were not met."
Is that the guy who lost a kid at Sandy Hook whose death wasn't worth an invite to the whitehouse for daring to disagree with his majesty?
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
If a conservative prof called for kids to be shot, it would be headline news and the prof would be instantly fired.
Not a nice thing to say, BUT - I think that what he means is that if a child of an NRA member was shot and killed in a mass shooting, that is when something would be done about guns. He thinks nothing will happen until the NRA are personally affected by a mass shooting.
Look at that....someone actually understands context
Look at that....someone actually understands context
What does the NRA have to do with it?
-Geaux
By NRA do you mean that organization that emphasizes gun safety and the joys of shooting sports or the organization that has a death grip on Congress to kill any gun legislation?
What does the NRA have to do with it?
-Geaux
By NRA do you mean that organization that emphasizes gun safety and the joys of shooting sports or the organization that has a death grip on Congress to kill any gun legislation?
That is either an ignorant statement, or an outright lie! The NRA has been in favor of legislation for many years that would identify mental cases better before letting them buy a gun. Generally, what the NRA teaches saves many, many lives.
His point is valid. When the sons & daughters of gun nutters get slaughtered by mass murderers whose easy access to guns assisted in their blood-soaked act, their attitude changes.
It's another version of "there are no atheists in fox holes".
Listen gun nutters. Australia, Canada and the UK all have strict gun control and far less gun violence. If we adopt some version of their laws, we will have less gun violence.
It's your fault that we have so much gun violence.
