Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you don't blame Bush for his destroying the economy in 2007 while HE was "in office"!!!!!It happened during Obama's time in office. It's his. If Obama is so good, why hasn't it come way down? He's had almost 8 years.Except it was Bush destroying the economy that drove it up in the first place, as you well know.Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center
SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years
SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.
It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Obama has been providing people with his own money? If he hadn't let it go up so high, it wouldn't have to come down. It's still higher by over 10 million than under ANY other President.
The Bush family control the "OPEC lever" through their half brother Bandar Bush.The OPEC lever...So tell me what leaver was pulled by the Dems in 2007 that overcame a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto????Who cares, really....So, what year did Bush disown his half brother Bandar Bush??????Except we are talking about the 2007 era....Bullshit!
Saudi Sleaze: Bandar Bush a/k/a Saudi Prince Bandar Took $2B Kickbacks from Contractors
Saudi Prince Bandar was so close to President Bush that on the evening of 9/11, after America was attacked by 15 of his countrymen, Prince Bandar was on the Roosevelt Balcony with the Prez, smoking stogies. Bandar is so close to his father and the rest of the Bushes that they nicknamed him “Bandar Bush.”
Bandar’s wife, Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, is the one who–you’ll recall–paid the rent for two of those countrymen–two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf Al-Hazmi and Khalid Al-Midhar. But she really didn’t know where the money was going. That’s what she says, so it must be so. Right?
The levers of power were in democrats hands in 2007....remember that summer of 2008 when the price of gas was so high, American roads were empty...it was surreal...
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?It doesn't even keep up with population growth. Nor does it take into account the fact that there are 5 million fewer jobs than there were under Bush.
Get a clue.
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?
Get a clue.
As long as they are 'blaming' they don't have to do anything. Obama has been President for almost eight years. How's the 'young negro men' employment numbers looking for them? What "good paying" "shovel ready" jobs are the young negro men working at today?Leftists are good at one thing. Blaming.
As long as they are 'blaming' they don't have to do anything. Obama has been President for almost eight years. How's the 'young negro men' employment numbers looking for them? What "good paying" "shovel ready" jobs are the young negro men working at today?Leftists are good at one thing. Blaming.
Obama blames all the gun violence on 'guns'. When was the last time he went to 'Shitcagoland' and lifted one fucking finger to curb the epidemic negro on negro murders happening EVERY FUCKING DAY!!!!!!
Send in 10K NG. Wheep the fucking inner city! Anyone found in possession of an illegal gun gets an automatic ten year prison sentence. NO PAROLE! They all go to Nevada where they can live in army tents and wear pink underwear in 120 F Temperatures and enjoy a daily lunch of 'cat-food' sandwiches and warm water to wash them down.
NO fucking 'work-out' equipment! No fucking TV.
They could fill their days knitting fucking toques and scarves for the poor.
You'd see thousands of illegal guns magically filling up the fucking dumpsters overnight.
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?
Get a clue.
Was Bush losing 770,000 jobs a month like the economy he gave Obama?
Why do you leftists need gas? You talk as if you had somewhere to go.I don't know about the rest of you, but I just LOVE my Obamagas
Just drive up and say....Fill it up with Obamagas
Beats having to pay that $4 a gallon for gas under Bush
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?
Get a clue.
Was Bush losing 770,000 jobs a month like the economy he gave Obama?
Here are the FACTS on GWB!
HERE is why GWB will be considered a "great" President when you idiots remember the FACTS of what occurred from 2001 to 2008!
Recession??
Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Because idiots don't seem to comprehend... RECESSIONS are like large ships.. it takes miles to turn one...i.e. so does a "RECESSION"...
it doesn't just start the day NBER states... it is a slow degradation and it started under CLINTON!!!
Source: USATODAY.com - It's official: 2001 recession only lasted eight months
A Major $8 trillion market loss
Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $8 trillion in losses? Again Clinton laid claim BUT someone had to pay and it occurred during Bush's first year!
$8 trillion in market losses MEAN lost tax revenue. PLUS JOBS!!!!
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $8 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies.
More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion
The worst attacks on the USA in History.. 3,000 deaths!!!
Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Are you aware this happened???
Now before you idiots say "well Bush should have known"! DUMMIES... ever hear of the Gorelick Memo signed under CLINTON??
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!! Looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
Gorelick Memo Allegedly Impeded Probe of Clinton Fundraising Scandal
1995 memo [Clinton presidency-concerned about Chinese election sales] Gorelick wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK Memo!
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..
especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures
that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’
that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew
Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: 10 Events That Rocked the Financial World
Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.
$1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history. 2,215 lives lost
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
Rank Disaster Year Deaths Damage* $250 Billion in damages in the 8 disasters of the top 15 disasters in history!
1. Hurricane Katrina (LA/MS/AL/FL) 2005 1833 $133,800,000,000
6. Hurricane Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 112 $27,000,000,000
7. Hurricane Wilma (FL) 2005 35 $17,100,000,000
8. Hurricane Rita (TX/LA) 2005 119 $17,100,000,000
9. Hurricane Charley (FL) 2004 35 $16,500,000,000
12. Midwest Floods 2008 24 $15,000,000,000
13. Hurricane Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 57 $13,000,000,000
14. 30-State Drought 2002 0 $11,400,000,000
Costliest U.S. Weather Disasters | Weather Underground
THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of:
a) 400,000 jobs lost due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs lost in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts... In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property..
IN SPITE of the above:
2002 $157.8 billion deficit.. also 9/11 occurred and tax revenues lowered for years later due to dot.com/9-11 losses against revenue.
2003 $377.6 billion deficit.. BRAND new cabinet Homeland Security, plus loans made to businesses.. again tax revenues down..affect of 9/11
2004 $412.7 billion deficit.. Revenues up by 5.5% spending increased and economy getting back.
2005 $318.3 billion deficit.. revenues up by 14.5% deficit decreasing at rate of 22%
2006 $248.2 billion deficit.. revenues up by 11.7% deficit decrease 22%
2007 $160.7 billion deficit.. revenues up by 6.7% deficit decrease 35%
2008 $458.6 billion deficit.. revenues down and deficit INCREASED TARP loan mostly...
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=20
BEA National Economic Accounts
Average annual growth in the Gross Domestic Product over 8 years 2.9% compared to the Idiot's..
SMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
IN Spite of all the events AND if the housing bubble caused by the below people hadn't occurred it would have
been: 4.4% compared to what now???
2001 2.3% increase
2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%
2008 -7.7%
First of all you ASSUMPTION is that those black males that are sent 20% more often and had longer sentences WERE heads of households.
Where did you get that FACT that black males in households were sent 20% more often and had longer sentences??
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?
Get a clue.
Was Bush losing 770,000 jobs a month like the economy he gave Obama?
To say nothing of the fact the Bush's recovery from the 01 recession was faster and more robust than Obama's "recovery".The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
"Massive"?
Get a clue.
Was Bush losing 770,000 jobs a month like the economy he gave Obama?
Indeed he was. The MSM was CONSTANTLY reporting in a negative way to drive jobs down. The amount of propaganda they were spewing so that obama would be elected was amazing to behold.
It is amazing how such a strong Bush economy could be simply TALKED down, and yet such a weak Obama economy keeps growing no matter how much GOP hate radio has been talking the economy down.The MSM was CONSTANTLY reporting in a negative way to drive jobs down.
It is amazing how such a strong Bush economy could be simply TALKED down, and yet such a weak Obama keeps growing no matter how much GOP hate radio has been talking the economy down.The MSM was CONSTANTLY reporting in a negative way to drive jobs down.
It is amazing how such a strong Bush economy could be simply TALKED down, and yet such a weak Obama economy keeps growing no matter how much GOP hate radio has been talking the economy down.The MSM was CONSTANTLY reporting in a negative way to drive jobs down.
But you don't blame Bush for his destroying the economy in 2007 while HE was "in office"!!!!!It happened during Obama's time in office. It's his. If Obama is so good, why hasn't it come way down? He's had almost 8 years.Except it was Bush destroying the economy that drove it up in the first place, as you well know.Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Obama has been providing people with his own money? If he hadn't let it go up so high, it wouldn't have to come down. It's still higher by over 10 million than under ANY other President.
You prove the adage that you can't be a hypocrite if you aren't a CON$ervative.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.
Good point...College education should be reserved only for those who can afford it
College education should be for those who have demonstrated the academic prowess to have excelled in High School.
Unfortunately, College is now a "corporation" that has dumbed itself down to accept anyone. It was never like this until the middle 80s, when these "geniuses" figured out that they could turn a buck by admitting everyone.
The result? Idiots with degrees that can't find South America on a map.
You never went to college did you?
But you don't blame Bush for his destroying the economy in 2007 while HE was "in office"!!!!!It happened during Obama's time in office. It's his. If Obama is so good, why hasn't it come way down? He's had almost 8 years.Except it was Bush destroying the economy that drove it up in the first place, as you well know.Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Obama has been providing people with his own money? If he hadn't let it go up so high, it wouldn't have to come down. It's still higher by over 10 million than under ANY other President.
You prove the adage that you can't be a hypocrite if you aren't a CON$ervative.
But you place no blame on the Democrat Congress that passed laws during that time. You blame one person because he was in office yet you refuse to blame Obama when food stamp user increased 70% while he is in office. You prove what I've said about Liberals for years. It's not (fill in the blank) when you do it only when the other guy does.
