US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco

Who really wants to work two 29 hour full time jobs?
With education you don't have to. Something most Republicans simply don't get. Sad.

You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.

Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.
Too bad Republicans don't know anything about education. They just assume it's all about college. Becoming an apprentice Plumber is getting an education. Course, being a plumber is too hard. Turns out even Joe wasn't one. He just pretended to be.

The bizarre truth about 'Joe the Plumber': He's not called Joe, he's not a plumber and he owes $1,200 in tax
Who can afford all the democrats taxes to become a .gov certified plumber?
 
Who really wants to work two 29 hour full time jobs?
With education you don't have to. Something most Republicans simply don't get. Sad.

You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.

Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.

Good point...College education should be reserved only for those who can afford it

College education should be for those who have demonstrated the academic prowess to have excelled in High School.

Unfortunately, College is now a "corporation" that has dumbed itself down to accept anyone. It was never like this until the middle 80s, when these "geniuses" figured out that they could turn a buck by admitting everyone.

The result? Idiots with degrees that can't find South America on a map.
 
With education you don't have to. Something most Republicans simply don't get. Sad.

You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.

Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.
Too bad Republicans don't know anything about education. They just assume it's all about college. Becoming an apprentice Plumber is getting an education. Course, being a plumber is too hard. Turns out even Joe wasn't one. He just pretended to be.

The bizarre truth about 'Joe the Plumber': He's not called Joe, he's not a plumber and he owes $1,200 in tax
Who can afford all the democrats taxes to become a .gov certified plumber?


I would never dream of hiring a .Gov plumber. Jesus, it would take him 4 years to do the job (replacing a faucet) and it would cost $8,000

No thank you. I want the guy that did his apprentship and got his journeyman's license or Master Plumber from a local concern.
 
The Obama economy generated 13 million more food stamp recipients
And Bush generated 14.7 million more, and Obama is actually 12.3. Bush owns the modern record for adding the most new recipients.

The percentage of society on food stamps is a record held by Obama. It's still over 45 million. Surely, if Obama is as good as you say he is, he could do something about that record.
No it isn't! Food stamp participation has declined over 1.2 million over the last year.
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.
 
The Obama economy generated 13 million more food stamp recipients
And Bush generated 14.7 million more, and Obama is actually 12.3. Bush owns the modern record for adding the most new recipients.

The percentage of society on food stamps is a record held by Obama. It's still over 45 million. Surely, if Obama is as good as you say he is, he could do something about that record.
No it isn't! Food stamp participation has declined over 1.2 million over the last year.
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
 
With education you don't have to. Something most Republicans simply don't get. Sad.

You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.

Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.

Good point...College education should be reserved only for those who can afford it

College education should be for those who have demonstrated the academic prowess to have excelled in High School.

Unfortunately, College is now a "corporation" that has dumbed itself down to accept anyone. It was never like this until the middle 80s, when these "geniuses" figured out that they could turn a buck by admitting everyone.

The result? Idiots with degrees that can't find South America on a map.

When someone in college has to take remedial level classes in order to come up to a level they should have been BEFORE graduating high school, it's a problem.
 
With education you don't have to. Something most Republicans simply don't get. Sad.

You mean the education Liberals want someone to pay for on behalf of a kid whose own parents won't do it? If the kid's own parents don't think he/she is a good investment, neither to do I.
Education is a good investment for the Country. Red States show us what happens without education.

Then let the parents of those kids prove to me their kid is one by providing college for their own children.

Good point...College education should be reserved only for those who can afford it

College education should be for those who have demonstrated the academic prowess to have excelled in High School.

Unfortunately, College is now a "corporation" that has dumbed itself down to accept anyone. It was never like this until the middle 80s, when these "geniuses" figured out that they could turn a buck by admitting everyone.

The result? Idiots with degrees that can't find South America on a map.
I agree....college is being turned into 13, 14, 15 and 16th grade....just a further extension of the liberal propaganda complex. Colleges are even dropping math to get it out of the way of indoctrination...
 
And Bush generated 14.7 million more, and Obama is actually 12.3. Bush owns the modern record for adding the most new recipients.

The percentage of society on food stamps is a record held by Obama. It's still over 45 million. Surely, if Obama is as good as you say he is, he could do something about that record.
No it isn't! Food stamp participation has declined over 1.2 million over the last year.
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
 
The percentage of society on food stamps is a record held by Obama. It's still over 45 million. Surely, if Obama is as good as you say he is, he could do something about that record.
No it isn't! Food stamp participation has declined over 1.2 million over the last year.
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
 
No it isn't! Food stamp participation has declined over 1.2 million over the last year.
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
 
Prove it.
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
 
SNAP/Food Stamp Participation Data « Food Research & Action Center

SNAP Over-the-Year Participation Dropped by Nearly 1.3 Million People in March 2016 to Its Lowest Level in Five Years

SNAP participation averaged 44,344,259 persons in March 2016, a decrease of 38,667 persons compared with February 2016 and a decrease of 1,297,492 persons compared with March 2015.

It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
So tell me, what 2007 law did the Dems get past a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto that burned down Bush's house of cards????
 
It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
So tell me, what 2007 law did the Dems get past a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto that burned down Bush's house of cards????
Democrat were bought by the Saudis and played opec games to slow the economy down...only they overshot....remember the summer of blacktop they rolled out to jolt the economy after their attack on it....it was epic funny fail.....
 
It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.




Do it hurt to be made the fool like you are every day?



Hey all you asshole republicans have to do is lower the income amount that qualifies for SNAP. You make 10k a year, no SNAP for you.
You asshole republicans do control the congress. Right? Even though it is a do nothing congress. Do something.

So change the qualifying amount. Your problem solved.
LMAO.
 
Yeah, thanks to Bush destroying the economy he passed to Obama, but unlike Bush who increased food stamp use his entire reign, Obama has been reducing food stamp use since the end of 2011.
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
So tell me, what 2007 law did the Dems get past a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto that burned down Bush's house of cards????
Democrat were bought by the Saudis and played opec games to slow the economy down...only they overshot....remember the summer of blacktop they rolled out to jolt the economy after their attack on it....it was epic funny fail.....
So you have no Dem legislation.
Thank you.

Don't you have the Dems confused with Bandar Bush, George Bush's "adopted" half brother?
Why yes, yes you do!
 
Strange how disaster started in 2007....what changed?????
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
So tell me, what 2007 law did the Dems get past a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto that burned down Bush's house of cards????
Democrat were bought by the Saudis and played opec games to slow the economy down...only they overshot....remember the summer of blacktop they rolled out to jolt the economy after their attack on it....it was epic funny fail.....
Don't you have the Dems confused with Bandar Bush, George Bush's "adopted" half brother?
Why yes, yes you do!
No...
 
It's STILL in the mid 40 million range. That's more than any other President.




Do it hurt to be made the fool like you are every day?



Hey all you asshole republicans have to do is lower the income amount that qualifies for SNAP. You make 10k a year, no SNAP for you.
You asshole republicans do control the congress. Right? Even though it is a do nothing congress. Do something.

So change the qualifying amount. Your problem solved.
LMAO.
Will,that make you poorer? :lol:
 
Bush's house of cards fell.
Democrats burned the house down....just look around at their accomplishments of fail.....
So tell me, what 2007 law did the Dems get past a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto that burned down Bush's house of cards????
Democrat were bought by the Saudis and played opec games to slow the economy down...only they overshot....remember the summer of blacktop they rolled out to jolt the economy after their attack on it....it was epic funny fail.....
Don't you have the Dems confused with Bandar Bush, George Bush's "adopted" half brother?
Why yes, yes you do!
No...
Actually you do but you are too dishonest to admit it.
 
The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...


declining-middle-class-income-and-taxes-15-638.jpg
What are you going to do, when the Obumble Administration dissolves, and you lose your job as Deputy Chief of Staff for Fellatio?

Jesus-H-Tap-Dancing-Christ-on-a-Crutch, but you few remaining Orgasmic ObamaBot brown-nosers make me want to puke...

Hopey-Changey... Hopey-Changey... Hopey-Changey...
52_52.gif


========================================================

1. how many of those are McJobs rather than real jobs?

2. how many jobs died under Obumble, vs. the number that died under others?

3. what's the Net Gain or Loss under Obumble, vs. the gain or loss under others?

4. how many people have stopped looking under Obumble, vs. the numbers who stopped looking under others?

Raw "New Jobs" numbers are useless without the necessary surrounding statistical and situational context.

Useless.

But the Patricians don't want the Plebs to dwell on that.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top