US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco

[edthecynic]

Another 5,000,000 gave up looking...count them as employed

LIAR!

 

[IcebergSlim]

blah blah blah

Unemployment remains at 20% and those who do have jobs are making the same pay they would have 20 years ago. Your boy is a DISASTER and without doubling the debt with his make-work phony jobs, we'd all be selling pencils and apples on street corners ala 1930.

Unemployment remains at 20%

Link?

and those who do have jobs are making the same pay they would have 20 years ago

No...they are not...

Your boy is a DISASTER

How many votes did you cast for Scrub? Shall we compare the trends in employment under each?

and without doubling the debt with his make-work phony jobs

Show me the math for this "doubling"....then provide a credible citation for the "make-work phony jobs" phoniness.....

I don't do citations for leftist turds....everything I've said is correct and moreover, I left out the real travesty of this little band of fellow-travelers running things now; ie the intended consequences of dividing us as a people. Obama should be dragged from the WH, given a 30 minute trial at the Pentagon, found guilty of treason, taken back to the south lawn and hanged.

I don't do citations for leftist turds.

Isn't that convenient.....

the intended consequences of dividing us as a people

Like "Unrepentant 2 Time Scrub Voting Imbecile Drudge Dross" vs. "the Reality Based Community"?

found guilty of treason

Did you forget "Uppityness in the First Degree"?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

Asserting is easy....what can you actually demonstrate?

 

[IcebergSlim]

So one month of job growth after 7 1/2 years gives you a hard on?



Really?

They call you the premature, evaluater, don't they?

The "hard on" is for the longest streak of job growth in 50 years...you can go back under the rock now.

Long, yes, but incredibly weak. Obama is going to be the first President to not have a single year of 3% GDP growth in his entire Presidency. Particularly remarkable considering the hole he started in. Typically GDP growth is high coming out of recessions just getting back where we were. You're proud of that? You think kids should get stars for getting Ds too or just Presidents?

Obama is going to be the first President to not have a single year of 3% GDP growth in his entire Presidency. Particularly remarkable considering the hole he started in. Typically GDP growth is high coming out of recessions just getting back where we were.

Do you know the formula for calculating GDP?

One of the variables is "G"......

This is the first recession since 1960 where the Federal & State Government contribution to GDP has been negative.....

 

[Faun]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

Asserting is easy....what can you actually demonstrate?

His post already demonstrated that he's a moron. Almost all those jobs have been full time jobs yet he carries the rightwing jock strap which mindlessly spits that they're mostly low paying part time work.

 

[IcebergSlim]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PgKZ-prq...yFHUusZ_qoTTDQMgCLcB/s1600/PrivateMay2016.PNG


Clinton's two terms were the best for both private and total non-farm job creation, followed by Reagan's 2nd term.

Currently Obama's 2nd term is on pace to be the 3rd best ever for private job creation. However, with very few public sector jobs added, Obama's 2nd term is only on pace to be the fourth best for total job creation.

Note: Only 205 thousand public sector jobs have been added during the first forty months of Obama's 2nd term (following a record loss of 708 thousand public sector jobs during Obama's 1st term). This is about 15% of the public sector jobs added during Reagan's 2nd term!

 

[Faun]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PgKZ-prq...yFHUusZ_qoTTDQMgCLcB/s1600/PrivateMay2016.PNG


Clinton's two terms were the best for both private and total non-farm job creation, followed by Reagan's 2nd term.

Currently Obama's 2nd term is on pace to be the 3rd best ever for private job creation. However, with very few public sector jobs added, Obama's 2nd term is only on pace to be the fourth best for total job creation.

Note: Only 205 thousand public sector jobs have been added during the first forty months of Obama's 2nd term (following a record loss of 708 thousand public sector jobs during Obama's 1st term). This is about 15% of the public sector jobs added during Reagan's 2nd term!

Normally, the brain-dead right would celebrate a shrinking government. Unfortunately, their chronic ODS doesn’t permit them adhering to their own stated principles.

 

[Conservative65]

You left a key number out. There are more than 10 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2008. Those belong to your BOY Obama.

There were more than 14.7 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2000. Those belong to your GIRL Bush.

One big difference. Obama claims lower unemployment, a major factor that would cause food stamp use to go down, is happening. If unemployment, as is being claimed, is going way down, why isn't food stamp use going way down to match it?

 

[Conservative65]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PgKZ-prq...yFHUusZ_qoTTDQMgCLcB/s1600/PrivateMay2016.PNG


Clinton's two terms were the best for both private and total non-farm job creation, followed by Reagan's 2nd term.

Currently Obama's 2nd term is on pace to be the 3rd best ever for private job creation. However, with very few public sector jobs added, Obama's 2nd term is only on pace to be the fourth best for total job creation.

Note: Only 205 thousand public sector jobs have been added during the first forty months of Obama's 2nd term (following a record loss of 708 thousand public sector jobs during Obama's 1st term). This is about 15% of the public sector jobs added during Reagan's 2nd term!

Yet well over 40 million are still freeloading on food stamps. I thought job creation for which Obama takes credit would bring that number way down. It hasn't. Explain, or should I say make some excuse.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

Asserting is easy....what can you actually demonstrate?

His post already demonstrated that he's a moron. Almost all those jobs have been full time jobs yet he carries the rightwing jock strap which mindlessly spits that they're mostly low paying part time work.

That's the beauty of not relying on credible sources......Free your mind and the rest will follow...

You left a key number out. There are more than 10 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2008. Those belong to your BOY Obama.

There were more than 14.7 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2000. Those belong to your GIRL Bush.

One big difference. Obama claims lower unemployment, a major factor that would cause food stamp use to go down, is happening. If unemployment, as is being claimed, is going way down, why isn't food stamp use going way down to match it?

Lower unemployment is a FACT.......you can check with BLS........and SNAP participation, and spending, IS going down....

 

[IcebergSlim]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PgKZ-prq...yFHUusZ_qoTTDQMgCLcB/s1600/PrivateMay2016.PNG


Clinton's two terms were the best for both private and total non-farm job creation, followed by Reagan's 2nd term.

Currently Obama's 2nd term is on pace to be the 3rd best ever for private job creation. However, with very few public sector jobs added, Obama's 2nd term is only on pace to be the fourth best for total job creation.

Note: Only 205 thousand public sector jobs have been added during the first forty months of Obama's 2nd term (following a record loss of 708 thousand public sector jobs during Obama's 1st term). This is about 15% of the public sector jobs added during Reagan's 2nd term!

Yet well over 40 million are still freeloading on food stamps. I thought job creation for which Obama takes credit would bring that number way down. It hasn't. Explain, or should I say make some excuse.

It has...at least according to the people who administer the program....

the S in SNAP stands for SUPPLEMENTAL........do you have any idea what that means?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

I like that cutting too, since it was irrelevant to job counts. And lets not bullshit, no number would CUT IT for you when it comes to economy during Obama's stay in office. You should be honest on that point with yourself and others.

Mostly part time jobs you say? I say more bs. Same for "shit paying".

OK....that's quite enough of that!

 

[Faun]

You left a key number out. There are more than 10 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2008. Those belong to your BOY Obama.

There were more than 14.7 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2000. Those belong to your GIRL Bush.

One big difference. Obama claims lower unemployment, a major factor that would cause food stamp use to go down, is happening. If unemployment, as is being claimed, is going way down, why isn't food stamp use going way down to match it?

Why do you conflate food stamps with unemployment? Are you under the delusion that only unemployed folks are collecting food stamps? And why do you ignore that many elderly collect food stamps among this period where baby boomers are turning 62 at a rate of about 10,000 per day?

 

[edthecynic]

You left a key number out. There are more than 10 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2008. Those belong to your BOY Obama.

There were more than 14.7 million more FREELOADERS using food stamps than in 2000. Those belong to your GIRL Bush.

One big difference. Obama claims lower unemployment, a major factor that would cause food stamp use to go down, is happening. If unemployment, as is being claimed, is going way down, why isn't food stamp use going way down to match it?

But food stamp use IS going down from the highs due to the Great Bush Recession, you just have been misinformed that food stamps is not going down, and since that is what you want to hear you never bother to check your misinformation sources. But you WILL challenge me for my source, wont you?!!!

 

[kaz]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

I like that cutting too, since it was irrelevant to job counts. And lets not bullshit, no number would CUT IT for you when it comes to economy during Obama's stay in office. You should be honest on that point with yourself and others.

Mostly part time jobs you say? I say more bs. Same for "shit paying".

Strawman, I didn't say "mostly part-time jobs."

And 10 million people over 7 1/2 years in a country of 350 million starting at the bottom of a recession. Oooohhhhhh, I'm impressed. What they were mostly were government jobs. Leaches on the economy, not creators of the economy.

Calling Obama a jobs President is like calling W the Middle East peace President. You're a sycophant for the Democrats. If they farted, you'd as who brought the lilacs

 

[kaz]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Aww, Kaz is kazzing again. Out of all the posters here, you guessed me. While that fails the smile test, I can't help but find the humor in that coming from the poster who admitted he could be the "wife" of the house, depending on circumstances.

Showing my point on your obsession, thanks Faun. You created your special word for me, "kazzing," which you use in your unrestrained adulation for everything I post. Sorry, guy, I'm not gay. You're going to have to find someone who is and is into creepy.

Also, take a remedial English course to learn how to use quote marks

 

[kaz]

Long, yes, but incredibly weak.

Incredibly Weak? 17 million jobs gained streak is incredibly weak?

Time to put down that bong.

I like how you deleted the rest of my post. And yes, 17 million from the bottom of a recession over 7 1/2 years doesn't cut it.

Maybe if Obama weren't more focused with running the economy than helping it.

Most of the unemployment reduction was Obama convincing people to give up looking for a job.

There's also mostly shit paying and part time jobs

Asserting is easy....what can you actually demonstrate?

That Obama according to your own side created 10 million jobs in a country of 350 million people over 7 1/2 years starting from the bottom of a recession. Do the math, it sucks.

And that is even before government jobs that drain the economy rather than building it and that many of the jobs are low paying and part time

 

[kaz]

So one month of job growth after 7 1/2 years gives you a hard on?



Really?

They call you the premature, evaluater, don't they?

The "hard on" is for the longest streak of job growth in 50 years...you can go back under the rock now.

Long, yes, but incredibly weak. Obama is going to be the first President to not have a single year of 3% GDP growth in his entire Presidency. Particularly remarkable considering the hole he started in. Typically GDP growth is high coming out of recessions just getting back where we were. You're proud of that? You think kids should get stars for getting Ds too or just Presidents?

Obama is going to be the first President to not have a single year of 3% GDP growth in his entire Presidency. Particularly remarkable considering the hole he started in. Typically GDP growth is high coming out of recessions just getting back where we were.

Do you know the formula for calculating GDP?

One of the variables is "G"......

This is the first recession since 1960 where the Federal & State Government contribution to GDP has been negative.....

And starting from the bottom of a deep recession? Yeah, that's OK then ...



You sheeple will believe anything Democrats tell you. And I'll buy State and local are negative. But the Feds? I call BS to that, they are growing like crazy

 

[Rustic]

287,000 a tiny insignificant number in this context... LOL

 

[kaz]

No, but you sharing your homo-erotic fantasies on a public forum reveals more about you than I think you realize.

Your aura is feminine....with a dash of butch and a spoonful of stupid so I was just guessing.

Now see, I couldn't see who you were addressing, but I guessed it was Faun from your description. And when I clicked reply to see who it is ... there you go. Gay boy himself ...

Yeah, he's an Obama ho. Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

Amazing these dweebs, 7 1/2 years and one good month is all it takes for them to swoon over Obama

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PgKZ-prq...yFHUusZ_qoTTDQMgCLcB/s1600/PrivateMay2016.PNG


Clinton's two terms were the best for both private and total non-farm job creation, followed by Reagan's 2nd term.

Currently Obama's 2nd term is on pace to be the 3rd best ever for private job creation. However, with very few public sector jobs added, Obama's 2nd term is only on pace to be the fourth best for total job creation.

Note: Only 205 thousand public sector jobs have been added during the first forty months of Obama's 2nd term (following a record loss of 708 thousand public sector jobs during Obama's 1st term). This is about 15% of the public sector jobs added during Reagan's 2nd term!

Yet still can't hit 3% GDP growth for a year. He isn't even sniffing at it. And that counts government jobs