Useful information for gaining more truth-how to use it.

[Christophera]

except Robertson says he never said that and the reporter didnt attribute it to him
stop trying to make a claim that is a clear LIE

Actually, what we know for sure is that you never confirmed you thought that Robertson would not demand a correction If Newsweek had made an error, or that you think Newsweek refused to correct the article.

Which is it?

yes, actually, we did confirm it
but you still have your head firmly ensconced up your rectal cavity

Which means you've just been exposed lying again. You have never answered which you thought it was.

 

[DiveCon]

Actually, what we know for sure is that you never confirmed you thought that Robertson would not demand a correction If Newsweek had made an error, or that you think Newsweek refused to correct the article.

Which is it?

yes, actually, we did confirm it
but you still have your head firmly ensconced up your rectal cavity

Which means you've just been exposed lying again. You have never answered which you thought it was.

you are the liar

 

[Christophera]

yes, actually, we did confirm it
but you still have your head firmly ensconced up your rectal cavity

Which means you've just been exposed lying again. You have never answered which you thought it was.

you are the liar

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

 

[DiveCon]

Which means you've just been exposed lying again. You have never answered which you thought it was.

you are the liar

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

 

[Christophera]

you are the liar

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Do you really think that the lead engineer of the company responsible for the towers engineering is going to NOT read an article published by a global magazine with his information on the structure AFTER 3,000 are killed in what is supposed to be a structural collapse?

 

[DiveCon]

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Do you really think that the lead engineer of the company responsible for the towers engineering is going to NOT read an article published by a global magazine with his information on the structure AFTER 3,000 are killed in what is supposed to be a structural collapse?

so, you are now calling him a liar
LOL
you are such an idiot

 

[Christophera]

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Do you really think that the lead engineer of the company responsible for the towers engineering is going to NOT read an article published by a global magazine with his information on the structure AFTER 3,000 are killed in what is supposed to be a structural collapse?

so, you are now calling him a liar
LOL
you are such an idiot

No, you are misrepresenting. Similar to a lie, but manipulative deception instead. All within your proven capacity here working for the perpetrators interests of secrecy relating to true structure of the Twin towers core.

 

[DiveCon]

Do you really think that the lead engineer of the company responsible for the towers engineering is going to NOT read an article published by a global magazine with his information on the structure AFTER 3,000 are killed in what is supposed to be a structural collapse?

so, you are now calling him a liar
LOL
you are such an idiot

No, you are misrepresenting. Similar to a lie, but manipulative deception instead. All within your proven capacity here working for the perpetrators interests of secrecy relating to true structure of the Twin towers core.

actually, that is you
because there was NO CONCRETE IN THE CORE ABOVE GRADE

and it has been KNOWN since its construction

 

[Christophera]

you are the liar

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Exposing the FEMA core deception is very useful to gaining more truth, and that is why you oppose the true core design.

 

[DiveCon]

If I'm a liar you will have no problem answering again. Which is it? Did Robertson not demand a correction, or did Newsweek refuse to correct?

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Exposing the FEMA core deception is very useful to gaining more truth, and that is why you oppose the true core design.

except you expose NOTHING but your own delusions

 

[Christophera]

maybe because, as he said, he didnt READ the story when it came out, and it was too late to really ask for a retraction

you are too fucking stupid to understand that
why don't you email the man and ask him yourself

Exposing the FEMA core deception is very useful to gaining more truth, and that is why you oppose the true core design.

except you expose NOTHING but your own delusions

If that was the situation you would not be opposing my delusions.

If that was true you would have evidence.

What is useful is the fact that if FEMA did deceive NIST, the perpetrators would want you to say I was deluded because that might serve to conceal the methods of mass murder they used.

 

[DiveCon]

Exposing the FEMA core deception is very useful to gaining more truth, and that is why you oppose the true core design.

except you expose NOTHING but your own delusions

If that was the situation you would not be opposing my delusions.

If that was true you would have evidence.

What is useful is the fact that if FEMA did deceive NIST, the perpetrators would want you to say I was deluded because that might serve to conceal the methods of mass murder they used.

you are the ONLY one that believes what you do
that simple diagram is not the evil thing you try to make it out to be, most people with at least a modicum of common sense understand it was nothing more than a simplified drawing to present the tube within a tube concept and not meant to be a detailed diagram of the actual construction
only a delusional fucktard would even begin to make that claim
which is what you have exposed yourself as

 

[Christophera]

except you expose NOTHING but your own delusions

If that was the situation you would not be opposing my delusions.

If that was true you would have evidence.

What is useful is the fact that if FEMA did deceive NIST, the perpetrators would want you to say I was deluded because that might serve to conceal the methods of mass murder they used.

you are the ONLY one that believes what you do
that simple diagram is not the evil thing you try to make it out to be, most people with at least a modicum of common sense understand it was nothing more than a simplified drawing to present the tube within a tube concept

But it does not show that it and it does not say that. You misrepresent it, just like the perpetrators would want in order to keep the methods of mass murder secret.

 

[DiveCon]

If that was the situation you would not be opposing my delusions.

If that was true you would have evidence.

What is useful is the fact that if FEMA did deceive NIST, the perpetrators would want you to say I was deluded because that might serve to conceal the methods of mass murder they used.

you are the ONLY one that believes what you do
that simple diagram is not the evil thing you try to make it out to be, most people with at least a modicum of common sense understand it was nothing more than a simplified drawing to present the tube within a tube concept

But it does not show that it and it does not say that. You misrepresent it, just like the perpetrators would want in order to keep the methods of mass murder secret.

it doesnt HAVE to say it, fucktard
it goes without having to be said
anyone that knows anything at all about blueprints can clearly see that ISNT one

 

[Christophera]

you are the ONLY one that believes what you do
that simple diagram is not the evil thing you try to make it out to be, most people with at least a modicum of common sense understand it was nothing more than a simplified drawing to present the tube within a tube concept

But it does not show that it and it does not say that. You misrepresent it, just like the perpetrators would want in order to keep the methods of mass murder secret.

it doesnt HAVE to say it, fucktard
it goes without having to be said
anyone that knows anything at all about blueprints can clearly see that ISNT one

Why doesn't it have to say it if you have to say whether or not you think Robertson did not ask for a correction to the Newsweek story if it was wrong or Newsweek refused to correct the story in order to be reasonable and this looks like concrete?

And does this photo of WTC 2 below look like the above, or is the diagram more like a blueprint to you?

When the safety report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. also identifies a concrete core, shouldn't the diagram also say, "Concrete tube in a steel tube"? Particuarly if the Newsweek article of September 13, 2001
about the lead engineer of the towers construction has information identifying a concrete core?

 

[DiveCon]

But it does not show that it and it does not say that. You misrepresent it, just like the perpetrators would want in order to keep the methods of mass murder secret.

it doesnt HAVE to say it, fucktard
it goes without having to be said
anyone that knows anything at all about blueprints can clearly see that ISNT one

Why doesn't it have to say it if you have to say whether or not you think Robertson did not ask for a correction to the Newsweek story if it was wrong or Newsweek refused to correct the story in order to be reasonable and this looks like concrete?

And does this photo of WTC 2 below look like the above, or is the diagram more like a blueprint to you?

When the safety report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. also identifies a concrete core, shouldn't the diagram also say, "Concrete tube in a steel tube"? Particuarly if the Newsweek article of September 13, 2001
about the lead engineer of the towers construction has information identifying a concrete core?

yes, they DO look the same, you moron
sheeesh
'grow a fucking brain

 

[Christophera]

it doesnt HAVE to say it, fucktard
it goes without having to be said
anyone that knows anything at all about blueprints can clearly see that ISNT one

Why doesn't it have to say it if you have to say whether or not you think Robertson did not ask for a correction to the Newsweek story if it was wrong or Newsweek refused to correct the story in order to be reasonable and this looks like concrete?

And does this photo of WTC 2 below look like the above, or is the diagram more like a blueprint to you?

When the safety report of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. also identifies a concrete core, shouldn't the diagram also say, "Concrete tube in a steel tube"? Particuarly if the Newsweek article of September 13, 2001
about the lead engineer of the towers construction has information identifying a concrete core?

yes, they DO look the same, you moron
sheeesh
'grow a fucking brain

Like these two objects resemble one another.

 

[DiveCon]

ya know what, you are too fucking stupid for words

that must be why you HAVE to repost the same debunked bullshit photos over and over

 

[Christophera]

Thank you very much, coming from you that means a lot. Do you always exhibit defeat so graciously? Or are you getting hungry because you've been trying to eat peas with a knife and you've learned something vital?

 

[DiveCon]

Thank you very much, coming from you that means a lot. Do you always exhibit defeat so graciously? Or are you getting hungry because you've been trying to eat peas with a knife and you've learned something vital?

you are a proven liar and have been exposed as a fucking MORON