Using the EPA to Conquer America

[skookerasbil]

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/KOTUG-Tugs-Assist-TI-Europe-to-Enter-Terminal_1.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[G.T.]

Isnt there an age guideline to posting here? Pretty sure kooks is like 6yrs old.

 

[skookerasbil]

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/image006.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's a guilty pleasure of mine to expose the stupidity of subscribing to environmentalism.


No, it's not a science, it is a spin-off of communism, the de jure theft of private property via regulation, and 'movement' is sold to those in search of some sort of ersatz 'heroism,' and meaning in their empty lives, the less than astute hand-wringers, as the idea that they are saving the earth.

Oh boy!

It's the use of the EPA in the totalitarian attempt to centralize all power, and further destroy the federalism on which our Constitution is based.






And, in the following, you'll find another reason to end the false 'crusade.'

1. "... EPA Rules Would Hurt Economy, Threaten States’ ‘Sovereignty’

2. The Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to tighten rules governing the nation’s water and air quality would have a crippling effect on state and local economies and send consumer energy prices soaring, the attorneys general of two rural states told a House panel ...




3. ... the EPA’s proposals to amend three of its regulations.

The first would mandate reductions in emissions at coal-fired power plants and similar facilities;

the second would require reductions in ozone, or smog, levels; and

the third would clarify the types of waterways controlled by the EPA under the Clean Water Act.

... the EPA’s growing efforts to meddle in matters best left to the states.

4. “The people of Montana have taken steps to fully protect [the state’s waterways] for ourselves, our downstream neighbors and all of our progeny,” Fox said.

Those protections, he explained, begin with the state’s constitution, which asserts Montana’s right to make decisions regarding its water use — and requires the state legislature to “provide adequate remedies for the protection” of its waters.... the EPA’s actions are nothing more than a power grab.




5. ... it is my duty to stand up and push back when I perceive an agency of the federal government overreaching the authority given to it by Congress and proposing actions that infringe on our sovereignty,”...


6. ...EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told a congressional panel two weeks ago. “We are simply trying to define it better for everyone, so everyone is on the same page.”

7. “The EPA’s attempt to ‘clarify’ the definition of waters [is] so expansive that it could likely control land use activities over most of the United States,” ....“At best, the proposed definition simply creates more confusion and litigation.”

At worst, she said, the EPA’s actions will give it “unfettered regulatory jurisdiction” over most of the water in her state."
AGs Oppose EPA Clean Water Act Clean Power Plan PJ Media




Be very clear.
This is in the Science Forum simply to make certain that those who wrongly believe that 'environmentalism' is science see it.

This is real issue::

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

The use of the EPA, for political gain, proves that.

So what you are saying is that when one of these leaks adjacent to your own property, and fumes get into your home, which is blown up with you in it when the fumes reach your water heater:

You're good with that because, well hell, the petrochemical industry has your back.

As usual, a stupid baseless analogy.

Here's a plan: let's stick to what I say, not for why you lie about me saying.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[


1. Just doesn't sink in, does it: environmentalism isn't a science. It is a political view, a spin-off of communism. So pollution doesn't their purview, other than as an excise to co-opt other people's property.

Environmentalism is a movement to protect the environment. You oppose environmentalism which puts you against protecting the environment.

Your post isn't true....but, you are the NYLiar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's a guilty pleasure of mine to expose the stupidity of subscribing to environmentalism.


No, it's not a science, it is a spin-off of communism, the de jure theft of private property via regulation, and 'movement' is sold to those in search of some sort of ersatz 'heroism,' and meaning in their empty lives, the less than astute hand-wringers, as the idea that they are saving the earth.

Oh boy!

It's the use of the EPA in the totalitarian attempt to centralize all power, and further destroy the federalism on which our Constitution is based.






And, in the following, you'll find another reason to end the false 'crusade.'

1. "... EPA Rules Would Hurt Economy, Threaten States’ ‘Sovereignty’

2. The Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to tighten rules governing the nation’s water and air quality would have a crippling effect on state and local economies and send consumer energy prices soaring, the attorneys general of two rural states told a House panel ...




3. ... the EPA’s proposals to amend three of its regulations.

The first would mandate reductions in emissions at coal-fired power plants and similar facilities;

the second would require reductions in ozone, or smog, levels; and

the third would clarify the types of waterways controlled by the EPA under the Clean Water Act.

... the EPA’s growing efforts to meddle in matters best left to the states.

4. “The people of Montana have taken steps to fully protect [the state’s waterways] for ourselves, our downstream neighbors and all of our progeny,” Fox said.

Those protections, he explained, begin with the state’s constitution, which asserts Montana’s right to make decisions regarding its water use — and requires the state legislature to “provide adequate remedies for the protection” of its waters.... the EPA’s actions are nothing more than a power grab.




5. ... it is my duty to stand up and push back when I perceive an agency of the federal government overreaching the authority given to it by Congress and proposing actions that infringe on our sovereignty,”...


6. ...EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told a congressional panel two weeks ago. “We are simply trying to define it better for everyone, so everyone is on the same page.”

7. “The EPA’s attempt to ‘clarify’ the definition of waters [is] so expansive that it could likely control land use activities over most of the United States,” ....“At best, the proposed definition simply creates more confusion and litigation.”

At worst, she said, the EPA’s actions will give it “unfettered regulatory jurisdiction” over most of the water in her state."
AGs Oppose EPA Clean Water Act Clean Power Plan PJ Media




Be very clear.
This is in the Science Forum simply to make certain that those who wrongly believe that 'environmentalism' is science see it.

This is real issue::

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

The use of the EPA, for political gain, proves that.

So what you are saying is that when one of these leaks adjacent to your own property, and fumes get into your home, which is blown up with you in it when the fumes reach your water heater:

You're good with that because, well hell, the petrochemical industry has your back.

Oh Gawd..............some people are just born hysterical.


So s0n.....whats it like navigating life thinking a house is going to fall out of the sky any second and onto your noggin?

I had two clients die because their well water was contaminated with gasoline products (most notably, benzene) from leaking underground storage tanks next door.

That's what it is like, bubba.

If they were your 'clients' they died of boredom.

 

[NYcarbineer]

http://s42.photobucket.com/user/bal...t-TI-Europe-to-Enter-Terminal.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
']

[


1. Just doesn't sink in, does it: environmentalism isn't a science. It is a political view, a spin-off of communism. So pollution doesn't their purview, other than as an excise to co-opt other people's property.

Environmentalism is a movement to protect the environment. You oppose environmentalism which puts you against protecting the environment.

Your post isn't true....but, you are the NYLiar.

What's not true?

 

[PoliticalChic]

[



2. "Ecology is a science. It produces knowledge. Environmentalism is a political and religious movement. It produces judgment and laws."

These are the words of Professor Wallace Kaufman, from his book, "No Turning Back," p. 92.
He knows whereof he speaks, as the former president of several environmental groups, and a long time activist.



.

Why are you so dependent on quoting others? Nobody cares who Wallace Kaufman is.

I do so love it when dolts like you advertise their anti-intellectual bent.

And with you, 'bent' is the operative term.


"Author, teacher, naturalist, environmental activist, and World Bank consultant Wallace Vickers Kaufman was a 1961 graduate of Duke University's Trinity College majoring in English.

The collection contains correspondence, writings and addresses, journals, reports, clippings and assorted print matter. Materials present primarily reflect Kaufman's environmental activism while residing in rural Chatham County, North Carolina and his consulting work with the World Bank and the International City/County Management Association in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc. Correspondence mostly documents Kaufman's role with the Conservation Council of North Carolina and the organization's collaboration with other local, regional, and national environmental organizations.

The journals and reports document Kaufman's work in former Soviet nations. They describe Kaufman's day to day activities in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Kazakhstan, and Poland that include descriptions of local customs and geographic regions, the difficulties and challenges inherent in transition from collectivism to privatization, and surveys of local businesses and manufactories. Also present in the collection is material documenting Kaufman's relationship with author Reynolds Price. This material includes mostly correspondence as well as several manuscripts and typescripts. The correspondence touches upon personal matters as well as professional including the activities of mutual friends and acquaintances, travels, and current works in progress."
Guide to the Wallace Kaufman Papers 1959-1994 Collection Guides Rubenstein Library

 

[G.T.]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's a guilty pleasure of mine to expose the stupidity of subscribing to environmentalism.


No, it's not a science, it is a spin-off of communism, the de jure theft of private property via regulation, and 'movement' is sold to those in search of some sort of ersatz 'heroism,' and meaning in their empty lives, the less than astute hand-wringers, as the idea that they are saving the earth.

Oh boy!

It's the use of the EPA in the totalitarian attempt to centralize all power, and further destroy the federalism on which our Constitution is based.






And, in the following, you'll find another reason to end the false 'crusade.'

1. "... EPA Rules Would Hurt Economy, Threaten States’ ‘Sovereignty’

2. The Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to tighten rules governing the nation’s water and air quality would have a crippling effect on state and local economies and send consumer energy prices soaring, the attorneys general of two rural states told a House panel ...




3. ... the EPA’s proposals to amend three of its regulations.

The first would mandate reductions in emissions at coal-fired power plants and similar facilities;

the second would require reductions in ozone, or smog, levels; and

the third would clarify the types of waterways controlled by the EPA under the Clean Water Act.

... the EPA’s growing efforts to meddle in matters best left to the states.

4. “The people of Montana have taken steps to fully protect [the state’s waterways] for ourselves, our downstream neighbors and all of our progeny,” Fox said.

Those protections, he explained, begin with the state’s constitution, which asserts Montana’s right to make decisions regarding its water use — and requires the state legislature to “provide adequate remedies for the protection” of its waters.... the EPA’s actions are nothing more than a power grab.




5. ... it is my duty to stand up and push back when I perceive an agency of the federal government overreaching the authority given to it by Congress and proposing actions that infringe on our sovereignty,”...


6. ...EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told a congressional panel two weeks ago. “We are simply trying to define it better for everyone, so everyone is on the same page.”

7. “The EPA’s attempt to ‘clarify’ the definition of waters [is] so expansive that it could likely control land use activities over most of the United States,” ....“At best, the proposed definition simply creates more confusion and litigation.”

At worst, she said, the EPA’s actions will give it “unfettered regulatory jurisdiction” over most of the water in her state."
AGs Oppose EPA Clean Water Act Clean Power Plan PJ Media




Be very clear.
This is in the Science Forum simply to make certain that those who wrongly believe that 'environmentalism' is science see it.

This is real issue::

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

The use of the EPA, for political gain, proves that.

So what you are saying is that when one of these leaks adjacent to your own property, and fumes get into your home, which is blown up with you in it when the fumes reach your water heater:

You're good with that because, well hell, the petrochemical industry has your back.

As usual, a stupid baseless analogy.

Here's a plan: let's stick to what I say, not for why you lie about me saying.

Since you are too cowardly to ever clearly state your position on issues, it is not lying to make reasonable assumptions about your positions based on the information available.

Would you abolish the EPA or not?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[



2. "Ecology is a science. It produces knowledge. Environmentalism is a political and religious movement. It produces judgment and laws."

These are the words of Professor Wallace Kaufman, from his book, "No Turning Back," p. 92.
He knows whereof he speaks, as the former president of several environmental groups, and a long time activist.



.

Why are you so dependent on quoting others? Nobody cares who Wallace Kaufman is.

I do so love it when dolts like you advertise their anti-intellectual bent.

And with you, 'bent' is the operative term.


"Author, teacher, naturalist, environmental activist, and World Bank consultant Wallace Vickers Kaufman was a 1961 graduate of Duke University's Trinity College majoring in English.

The collection contains correspondence, writings and addresses, journals, reports, clippings and assorted print matter. Materials present primarily reflect Kaufman's environmental activism while residing in rural Chatham County, North Carolina and his consulting work with the World Bank and the International City/County Management Association in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc. Correspondence mostly documents Kaufman's role with the Conservation Council of North Carolina and the organization's collaboration with other local, regional, and national environmental organizations.

The journals and reports document Kaufman's work in former Soviet nations. They describe Kaufman's day to day activities in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Kazakhstan, and Poland that include descriptions of local customs and geographic regions, the difficulties and challenges inherent in transition from collectivism to privatization, and surveys of local businesses and manufactories. Also present in the collection is material documenting Kaufman's relationship with author Reynolds Price. This material includes mostly correspondence as well as several manuscripts and typescripts. The correspondence touches upon personal matters as well as professional including the activities of mutual friends and acquaintances, travels, and current works in progress."
Guide to the Wallace Kaufman Papers 1959-1994 Collection Guides Rubenstein Library

So what? He's just one more person with opinions.

 

[G.T.]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

This joke might produce a giggle in the 6-10 or 68-90 age ranges. So to a certain segment of human, youre doing alright.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's a guilty pleasure of mine to expose the stupidity of subscribing to environmentalism.


No, it's not a science, it is a spin-off of communism, the de jure theft of private property via regulation, and 'movement' is sold to those in search of some sort of ersatz 'heroism,' and meaning in their empty lives, the less than astute hand-wringers, as the idea that they are saving the earth.

Oh boy!

It's the use of the EPA in the totalitarian attempt to centralize all power, and further destroy the federalism on which our Constitution is based.






And, in the following, you'll find another reason to end the false 'crusade.'

1. "... EPA Rules Would Hurt Economy, Threaten States’ ‘Sovereignty’

2. The Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to tighten rules governing the nation’s water and air quality would have a crippling effect on state and local economies and send consumer energy prices soaring, the attorneys general of two rural states told a House panel ...




3. ... the EPA’s proposals to amend three of its regulations.

The first would mandate reductions in emissions at coal-fired power plants and similar facilities;

the second would require reductions in ozone, or smog, levels; and

the third would clarify the types of waterways controlled by the EPA under the Clean Water Act.

... the EPA’s growing efforts to meddle in matters best left to the states.

4. “The people of Montana have taken steps to fully protect [the state’s waterways] for ourselves, our downstream neighbors and all of our progeny,” Fox said.

Those protections, he explained, begin with the state’s constitution, which asserts Montana’s right to make decisions regarding its water use — and requires the state legislature to “provide adequate remedies for the protection” of its waters.... the EPA’s actions are nothing more than a power grab.




5. ... it is my duty to stand up and push back when I perceive an agency of the federal government overreaching the authority given to it by Congress and proposing actions that infringe on our sovereignty,”...


6. ...EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told a congressional panel two weeks ago. “We are simply trying to define it better for everyone, so everyone is on the same page.”

7. “The EPA’s attempt to ‘clarify’ the definition of waters [is] so expansive that it could likely control land use activities over most of the United States,” ....“At best, the proposed definition simply creates more confusion and litigation.”

At worst, she said, the EPA’s actions will give it “unfettered regulatory jurisdiction” over most of the water in her state."
AGs Oppose EPA Clean Water Act Clean Power Plan PJ Media




Be very clear.
This is in the Science Forum simply to make certain that those who wrongly believe that 'environmentalism' is science see it.

This is real issue::

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

The use of the EPA, for political gain, proves that.

So what you are saying is that when one of these leaks adjacent to your own property, and fumes get into your home, which is blown up with you in it when the fumes reach your water heater:

You're good with that because, well hell, the petrochemical industry has your back.

As usual, a stupid baseless analogy.

Here's a plan: let's stick to what I say, not for why you lie about me saying.

Since you are too cowardly to ever clearly state your position on issues, it is not lying to make reasonable assumptions about your positions based on the information available.

Would you abolish the EPA or not?

She does it all the time. She was in one thread ranting about LBJ's war on poverty as the ultimate failure but by the time I got through with her she admitted she wouldn't get rid of Medicaid,

which is of course the single biggest program in the so-called war on poverty.

She's a dittohead, in the worst sense of that term.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

This joke might produce a giggle in the 6-10 or 68-90 age ranges. So to a certain segment of human, youre doing alright.

Try hard to understand: YOU are what produces the giggles.

Next time you go to a mind reader try and remember that you are entitled to a substantial discount.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's a guilty pleasure of mine to expose the stupidity of subscribing to environmentalism.


No, it's not a science, it is a spin-off of communism, the de jure theft of private property via regulation, and 'movement' is sold to those in search of some sort of ersatz 'heroism,' and meaning in their empty lives, the less than astute hand-wringers, as the idea that they are saving the earth.

Oh boy!

It's the use of the EPA in the totalitarian attempt to centralize all power, and further destroy the federalism on which our Constitution is based.






And, in the following, you'll find another reason to end the false 'crusade.'

1. "... EPA Rules Would Hurt Economy, Threaten States’ ‘Sovereignty’

2. The Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to tighten rules governing the nation’s water and air quality would have a crippling effect on state and local economies and send consumer energy prices soaring, the attorneys general of two rural states told a House panel ...




3. ... the EPA’s proposals to amend three of its regulations.

The first would mandate reductions in emissions at coal-fired power plants and similar facilities;

the second would require reductions in ozone, or smog, levels; and

the third would clarify the types of waterways controlled by the EPA under the Clean Water Act.

... the EPA’s growing efforts to meddle in matters best left to the states.

4. “The people of Montana have taken steps to fully protect [the state’s waterways] for ourselves, our downstream neighbors and all of our progeny,” Fox said.

Those protections, he explained, begin with the state’s constitution, which asserts Montana’s right to make decisions regarding its water use — and requires the state legislature to “provide adequate remedies for the protection” of its waters.... the EPA’s actions are nothing more than a power grab.




5. ... it is my duty to stand up and push back when I perceive an agency of the federal government overreaching the authority given to it by Congress and proposing actions that infringe on our sovereignty,”...


6. ...EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told a congressional panel two weeks ago. “We are simply trying to define it better for everyone, so everyone is on the same page.”

7. “The EPA’s attempt to ‘clarify’ the definition of waters [is] so expansive that it could likely control land use activities over most of the United States,” ....“At best, the proposed definition simply creates more confusion and litigation.”

At worst, she said, the EPA’s actions will give it “unfettered regulatory jurisdiction” over most of the water in her state."
AGs Oppose EPA Clean Water Act Clean Power Plan PJ Media




Be very clear.
This is in the Science Forum simply to make certain that those who wrongly believe that 'environmentalism' is science see it.

This is real issue::

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramschi’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

The use of the EPA, for political gain, proves that.

So what you are saying is that when one of these leaks adjacent to your own property, and fumes get into your home, which is blown up with you in it when the fumes reach your water heater:

You're good with that because, well hell, the petrochemical industry has your back.

As usual, a stupid baseless analogy.

Here's a plan: let's stick to what I say, not for why you lie about me saying.

Since you are too cowardly to ever clearly state your position on issues, it is not lying to make reasonable assumptions about your positions based on the information available.

Would you abolish the EPA or not?

She does it all the time. She was in one thread ranting about LBJ's war on poverty as the ultimate failure but by the time I got through with her she admitted she wouldn't get rid of Medicaid,

which is of course the single biggest program in the so-called war on poverty.

She's a dittohead, in the worst sense of that term.

It has become so very easy to prove you lie.

OK...one more time: let's see you produce any such post as "by the time I got through with her she admitted she wouldn't get rid of Medicaid,..."


Go for it, NYLiar.

 

[G.T.]

Pcs depraved degenerate mind has WAY too much time on its hands.

Teh wuuurld is da cunspeerasee

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

This joke might produce a giggle in the 6-10 or 68-90 age ranges. So to a certain segment of human, youre doing alright.

Try hard to understand: YOU are what produces the giggles.

Next time you go to a mind reader try and remember that you are entitled to a substantial discount.

Horrendous. Listen, if you are going to continue to attempt to roast people, you might want to get good at it first

Maybe get some practice on like, sesame streets twitter page attacking other 4 year olds, for example.

But please, by all means and if you must......keep failing here.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're out early...

...what, are they cleaning your cage?

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

This joke might produce a giggle in the 6-10 or 68-90 age ranges. So to a certain segment of human, youre doing alright.

Try hard to understand: YOU are what produces the giggles.

Next time you go to a mind reader try and remember that you are entitled to a substantial discount.

Horrendous. Listen, if you are going to continue to attempt to roast people, you might want to get good at it first

Maybe get some practice on like, sesame streets twitter page attacking other 4 year olds, for example.

But please, by all means and if you must......keep failing here.

I don't 'roast,' or 'attack'.....I accurately describe.

In your case it tends toward the redundant because you show what an ass you are right from the start.

Don't ever change.

 

[G.T.]

Heres an example of why googling for insults doesnt always produce teh funnnay

Dork

How formal of you to sign you name to the post.

Keep it up.

This joke might produce a giggle in the 6-10 or 68-90 age ranges. So to a certain segment of human, youre doing alright.

Try hard to understand: YOU are what produces the giggles.

Next time you go to a mind reader try and remember that you are entitled to a substantial discount.

Horrendous. Listen, if you are going to continue to attempt to roast people, you might want to get good at it first

Maybe get some practice on like, sesame streets twitter page attacking other 4 year olds, for example.

But please, by all means and if you must......keep failing here.

I don't 'roast,' or 'attack'.....I accurately describe.

In your case it tends toward the redundant because you show what an ass you are right from the start.

Don't ever change.

Your posts are like the drive ins.

100% projection, 100% horrible.