Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think that a process that excludes five of seven candidates to be fair which proves you are either corrupt, stupid or just morally lame as hell.
Fair elections are no big deal to you? Rigged votes are OK?
Shove it.
These are fair elections. The candidates had their chance to get on the ballot and they BLEW it. They're not entitled to a place on the ballot, they have to earn it.
Nothing in this is rigged. The rules were set out long ago. Gingrich doesn't even deny that he failed to collect the necessary signatures.
You think that a process that excludes five of seven candidates to be fair which proves you are either corrupt, stupid or just morally lame as hell.
The process doesn't exclude anyone.
It creates a means by which people wishing to become a party's nominee can gain a position on the primary ballot. Everyone can do it. Gingrich just failed to do it. Some people didn't even try to do it.
You know what sucked?
I was kept out of the running at the Boston Marathon.
Doesn't matter that I didn't try to qualify.
I was still kept out.
From now I can play the victim.Why Oh Why was I kept out of the Boston Marathon!
Getting to vote on two of seven candidates runing is not a fair election, dumbass.
And the rules have not been enforced like this 'a long time ago'. This is a new process and should be seriously over-hauled.
Any petition process that eliminates five of seven candidates is inherently goose-steppingly hostile to the popular vote.
You think that a process that excludes five of seven candidates to be fair which proves you are either corrupt, stupid or just morally lame as hell.
The process doesn't exclude anyone.
AGain, you try to fall back on semantic bullshit.
FIVE OF SEVEN CANDIDATES WILL NOT BE ON THE BALLOT.
That means it is a broken process.
It creates a means by which people wishing to become a party's nominee can gain a position on the primary ballot. Everyone can do it. Gingrich just failed to do it. Some people didn't even try to do it.
FIVE OF SEVEN DID NOT DO IT.
Are you just stupid or do you just want to eleminate voters choices to please the cronies running the game?
Probably both is my guess.
Getting to vote on two of seven candidates runing is not a fair election, dumbass.
Getting to vote on two of seven candidates runing is not a fair election, dumbass.
What candidates?
Several of those "candidates" didn't even attempt to gain a spot on the ballot. Two more candidates failed to meet the requirements. Two more did.
And the rules have not been enforced like this 'a long time ago'. This is a new process and should be seriously over-hauled.
Evidence, or shut it.
Any petition process that eliminates five of seven candidates is inherently goose-steppingly hostile to the popular vote.
This is the law of the state of Virginia. It is their issue to decide if this is how they will do things.
Getting to vote on two of seven candidates runing is not a fair election, dumbass.
Then your issue is with Gingrich and the other nitwits who failed to qualify; not the State of VA or some contrived ‘conspiracy.’
The process doesn't exclude anyone.
AGain, you try to fall back on semantic bullshit.
FIVE OF SEVEN CANDIDATES WILL NOT BE ON THE BALLOT.
That means it is a broken process.
It creates a means by which people wishing to become a party's nominee can gain a position on the primary ballot. Everyone can do it. Gingrich just failed to do it. Some people didn't even try to do it.
FIVE OF SEVEN DID NOT DO IT.
Are you just stupid or do you just want to eleminate voters choices to please the cronies running the game?
Probably both is my guess.
She's not stupid. She's obviously into the eggnog earlier than usual.
The fact that both have rules to qualify really escapes you, doesn't it?You know what sucked?
I was kept out of the running at the Boston Marathon.
Doesn't matter that I didn't try to qualify.
I was still kept out.
From now I can play the victim.
lolol, now you are comparing vetting candidates to runing a marathon.
Sheezus you just cant make this shit up!
lolol
True.You know what sucked?
I was kept out of the running at the Boston Marathon.
Doesn't matter that I didn't try to qualify.
I was still kept out.
Bachman, Huntsman, Perry, Gingrich, and Santorum are not nitwits, nitwit. Two spent probably millions of dollars hiring pros to get them on the ballot, got well over the needed number but got disqualified by a rigged process that threw out over 35% of the signatures. The other three knew that this game was so rigged that they didnt even bother.
And thats OK by your estimation because 'Dims da rules, Dude!'
lol, pathetic
Bachman, Huntsman, Perry, Gingrich, and Santorum are not nitwits, nitwit. Two spent probably millions of dollars hiring pros to get them on the ballot,...
Instead of making excuses for these yahoos, the real question is why didn't they know what was required of them to get on the ballot?
I'll tell you why - cause he just makes shit up.Bachman, Huntsman, Perry, Gingrich, and Santorum are not nitwits, nitwit. Two spent probably millions of dollars hiring pros to get them on the ballot, got well over the needed number but got disqualified by a rigged process that threw out over 35% of the signatures. The other three knew that this game was so rigged that they didnt even bother.
And thats OK by your estimation because 'Dims da rules, Dude!'
lol, pathetic
Do you have any evidence of this.
Gingrich turned in 11,050, just over 10% greater signatures then required. From that how do you determine that 35% were disqualified? The second requirement is fthat 400 qualified voters were needed from each district. That means if for one district the Gingrich campaign only turned in 300 qualified signatures, then they could have turned in 1,000,000 signatures and it wouldn't have made any difference. Failure to qualify by district is very likely since it appears they tried to gather the required signatures late in the game at a couple of DC are rallies.
So, (a) please provide the source for the 35% rejection amount, and (b) please show where he met the requirement of 400 from each of the 11 congressional districts.
Thank you in advance for your supporting evidence.
>>>>
All this crying because the politicians got out maneuvered Wow. Shut it.
Fair elections are no big deal to you? Rigged votes are OK?
Shove it.
Ron Paul will not defeat Obama. It will not be based on policy or philosophical differences
Um, do you really believe this???
There is no reason for anyone to think Paul cant beat Obama.
In fact, I think Paul has a better chance of defeating Obama than either Gingrich or Romnuts.
The fact that the GOP establishment loathes Paul at a level of intensity one can only compare to a force of Nature just makes him all the better in my view.
If he fails to get the nomination, I pray to God he runs as a third party candidate.
The fact that the GOP establishment loathes Paul at a level of intensity one can only compare to a force of Nature....
The fact that the GOP establishment loathes Paul at a level of intensity one can only compare to a force of Nature....
Explains why a conspiracy by the GOP establishment unjustly kept Gingrich from getting on the ballot, while Paul made it.
