- Dec 5, 2010
- 99,658
- 35,769
- 2,290
And it won't matter who wins.
It all leads to the same place.
Are you sure that you're not letting Natty C use your account?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it won't matter who wins.
It all leads to the same place.
She was a kid!This is the ONLY argument that you have, she entered a public forum, knowing how ill suited she was to answer questions in the public, and now you want to censor fair use content in the public sphere.
The government is not on your side, the ACLU is not on your side.
Maybe the CCP or United Russia is on your side, but you are making a very authoritarian argument.
We can agree, that for a public politician from one of the two major parties, it was a dumb thing to do. OTH? It was a joke and the left is just as bad, as I have proved.
No need to go on a censorship crusade b/c he made the presidential nominee of the DNC look like a fool.
. . . but as I wrote earlier, folks on the right troll and make fun of their opponents. Folks on the left censor theirs.
I have no sympathy or support for either.
They are both leading us to a dystopian nightmare.
We can agree, that for a public politician from one of the two major parties, it was a dumb thing to do.
Now you are making crap up.I'm glad you admit, that she should have been able to handle this, because we all learn to deal with it in Jr. High.
Is anything “too low”?That is how dumb this entire thread is.
Bitching about people being mean.
![]()
So was Nicolas Sandman, but neither he, nor his parents signed any release form.She was a kid!
Q.E.D.I would take this seriously, if it hadn't been for the fact that the establishment has been bullying Trump and all his followers since 2015.
![]()
So was Nicolas Sandman, but neither he, nor his parents signed any release form.
. . . as I had already pointed out. . .
So stuff it. Why are you commenting? Trump is an adult, a public figure, and a bully himself.Q.E.D.
So save it. The establishment don't care, not sure why I or anyone else should.
Nope, just the facts.Now you are making crap up.
Specious argument. You have no proof of this.Most kids do not have the emotional or developmental maturity at that age to deal with it.
Yup, censoring people. Using the legal system to attack others. Specious reasons for impeachment.Is anything “too low”?
Just pointing out, that both sides do it, and the establishment doesn't really give a shit for this young teen. YOU MAY, I MAY, and others of good conscious may, but the point is, the folks that started it were the government and corporate media.Why are you commenting? Trump is an adult, a public figure, and a bully himself.
Why do bring it up again?
As I already pointed out, my argument is the same regarding Sandmann. Why do bring it up again?
So stuff it. Why are you commenting?
You are relating your own experiences. Mine were similar. However, the world that kids have to navigate today is very different than what we had.Nope, just the facts.
I never had my folks fight my battles in school, nor did I fight my own kids. Most parents don't. You know that.
Bullying is a fact of life.
Is anything “too low”?
It isn't the job of government to raise kids.world that kids have to navigate today is very different than what we had.
A Federal Voter ID law will deal with the left's many games.
Q.E.D.And it won't matter who wins.
It all leads to the same place.
So when the global establishment finally gets its way on an international digital ID, you will be in favor of banning minors from the internet, YES?Now even have deep fakes, where teen girls are posted naked via sophisticated “photo-shopping” techniques. That kind of bullying.
/—-/ Here’s a crazy idea, Libs. Forget the gotcha stuff that isn’t working and run Kamala on her rock solid recess VP.Vance is an Epstein clone.
It isn’t about controlling the thoughts and ideas of others. Where did you derive that from?Because it didn't matter then, as proved by the courts, and it sure as hell does not matter when a teen enters a public pageant, signing away her content rights to that pageant, and now?
Because Vance makes an apt comparison, and the establishment has made up "controversy," and it is being used as a very, VERY week tactic to attack him, rather than focus on the issues.
It is unAmerican to want to control the thoughts and ideas of others.
That clip was fair use and in the public domain. We all know this. . .
So why you would want to be taking the side of censorship? It's beyond me. And if that isn't what motivates you in this thread? I don't know what the hell does.
That doesn’t change that it was badly done. Hell, you sure seem to have a double standard when it comes to teens…it isn’t ok to do it to Sandmann but it’s ok to do it to this “dumb” woman. Sandmann was 16, she was 17. Not much of a difference.Do you don't think folks can't handle a bit of bullying?
I have news for you, this dumb teen is no longer a teen, so the whole thing is a NON-ISSUE.
No. The internet has a lot of value, but things have exploded exponentially and our ability to manage the change has not.So when the global establishment finally gets its way on an international digital ID, you will be in favor of banning minors from the internet, YES?
![]()
The dumb blonde made fucking national news on how stupid she sounded. Everybody made fun the of the bitch. She was HORRIBLE. She was a pretty face and ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING BRAINS. She didn't stutter, she didn't SAY anything.
A blonde version of Kumalot. Works for me.
If you support Kumalot, you're not a U.S. American and you need to get a fucking map.
She's hot looking but too young to bang.She's 17.
Signing a release form. Appearing on television. Appearing in a publicity fueled pageant, al make one a public figure. Any one of them would. All of them definitely make her a public figure. If she is that sensitive, she should never have appeared in the pageant. When she's done over reacting, she can get on with her life.Yes it does, that is the very definition of it. She competed in a public forum/competition that she knew was being filmed.
![]()
Are you saying she was mishandled by her parents? Because that's where all blame should go. And, she's 34 years old now. 34! Get over yourself lady.She was a kid!