Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
Who in this country speaks for you that makes it so you dont have to condem it yourself?
Why is it OK to not say anything to discourage violence yet its OK to call the people who are saying the violence should be discouraged partisans and infer they only mention it for political reasons?
I give people the benefit of the doubt. I assume you condemn the actions of those that acted with violence against the Iraq war. I assume you condemn those that felt it necessary to cast a black mark on a funeral for a fallen soldier. I assume you condemn the act of murder inflicted on the pro life "sit in" guy. I assume you condemn the act of murder on the abortion doctor as well, as I do.
I do not ask my neighbor to confirm his HUMANITY with words. I assume he is a compassionate humane person by default. It is up to him to prove otherwise.
Correct me if I am worng, but I believe you assume all those with conservative beliefs are inhumane by default and it is up to us individually to prove otherwsie.
Am I correct?
Heres the post Immie,How was I supposed to say yes or no when thered is all types of assumptions to adress?
For you answering the only question (and there was only one question) in post #68 would have been easy. One simple word would have been all it took: "Yes", because you clearly do assume that those with conservative beliefs are inhumane by default. If you don't believe that, then you could have answered "No", but I highly doubt many who have been here more than a week or two would believe you.
That is all you had to do. If you wanted to clarify your answer in reference to his other assumptions you could have done so as well.
By the way: I don't remember you condemning those who acted in violence against the war in Iraq, but I suppose I will have to take your word for it and if I push it, you will ask me to go quote everyone of your 75000 posts over four websites to prove that you did not.
Immie