billyerock1991
Gold Member
- Apr 24, 2012
- 7,106
- 506
- 140
Ladies and gentlemen.
Every one of those people could get a better deal on the exchange. The employer could relieve himself of the burden of administering the benefit. These people are being screwed by the insurance company......and by their employer. Not by the ACA.
Does anyone know how much the employer is contributing to the premiums of the employees? It doesn't sound like he is.
The woman who is going to have premiums of over 1300 per month in that video is making more than $150,000 per year? Is that what we are to believe?
I am sorry that so many of you are so easily influenced by half-journalism. Mostly because it means that we get more of it.
Every one of those people could get a better deal on the exchange.
Prove it.
These people are being screwed by the insurance company......and by their employer. Not by the ACA.
The ACA required the coverage changes that caused the premium jump.
Does anyone know how much the employer is contributing to the premiums of the employees? It doesn't sound like he is.
Conjecture, irrelevant.
The woman who is going to have premiums of over 1300 per month in that video is making more than $150,000 per year? Is that what we are to believe?
Why do you ask?
well his 150,000 dollars is off ... the cut off for her is 95,000 that's for a family of 4 they will pay 680 dollars a month, not 1300 dollars with a 250 dollar emergency room cost with a max payout of 1200 that's it...