Bleipriester
Freedom!
- Nov 14, 2012
- 32,497
- 4,349
Maybe, the doctor was forced by Al-Qaeda to say that, ISIS-Sally.Maybe, A Syrian bomb hit a weapon depot of the terrorists. The terrorists should not have been terrorists. Or the doctor received a good fee for his entrance.Bombing terrorists isn´t a war crime. However, chemical attacks are and the UN says, your men in black launched chemical attacks on both civilians and forces. We can see, you are talking about "barrel bombs", instead. Did you meet some homeless persons on your search for deposit bottles for ISIS? And you stole their barrel-oven to claim its a barrel bomb?That´s nonsense. Terrorists and those who support them, are responsible for war crimes.
UN Investigator Undercuts New York Times on Syria. Assad Government not Responsible for August 21 Chemical Attack
Syria: UN Mission Report Confirms that "Opposition" Rebels Used Chemical Weapons against Civilians and Government Forces
I don't believe the UN has come out with the current report as to who has dropped those barrel bombs. It will be interesting to see what their investigation comes up with-- Assad's helicopter or the other side.
I believe the doctor who testified at the UN is not considered a terrorist by normal people. However, you being mentally ill would call him a terrorist. Let's remember how the people were aghast and practically in tears when they heard his testimony about how people couldn't breathe and died from the chlorine in those barrel bombs.
That's pretty disgusting saying the doctor got paid to testify. Don't you think he was doing all he could for those gasping for breath because of your beloved's barrel bombs with chlorine being dropped? Now go to sleep finally like a good little squirt. I am beginning to think you stay up to post because it is the only human communication you get in your sorry life.