Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the most likely scenario is that someone signed on the wrong line on the roster.
Dead people are on the rolls in every county in every state. Most family members don't think to call the registrar of voters when someone dies.
My office, every two weeks, receives a report of people who have died in the county. If someone doesn't die in the county they reside, it is often months and months before we get notified. What it usually takes is the deceased individual getting sent their ballot or getting a Jury summons.
Thanks to continuous budget cuts, our staffing is so low that death registrations are a low priority compared to new voter registrations, especially as an election draws near.
I'll say it again, there are dead people on the rolls in every county in every state. Having hundreds, even thousands, of dead people on the voter rolls is not an indication of fraud.
It was the fact these dead people actually voted in elections after they died.
And I'm telling you that the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line. I just spent last week going through a report that shows people who potentially "voted twice". Of the half dozen pages I went through, a number of those that showed up on the report (over a score) were from people who had signed on the wrong line of the roster.
Dead people aren't voting.
Clean voter rolls takes money and personnel. Not happening...
Every American should be concerned about the integrity of the vote.Wrong, Democrats are angry about typical racist voter suppression as every American should be...
You see a link showing dead people voting...and you insist dead people aren't voting.It was the fact these dead people actually voted in elections after they died.
And I'm telling you that the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line. I just spent last week going through a report that shows people who potentially "voted twice". Of the half dozen pages I went through, a number of those that showed up on the report (over a score) were from people who had signed on the wrong line of the roster.
Dead people aren't voting.
Clean voter rolls takes money and personnel. Not happening...
That is some serious willful ignorance there.
Uh huh. And you certainly have no agenda here.You see a link showing dead people voting...and you insist dead people aren't voting.And I'm telling you that the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line. I just spent last week going through a report that shows people who potentially "voted twice". Of the half dozen pages I went through, a number of those that showed up on the report (over a score) were from people who had signed on the wrong line of the roster.
Dead people aren't voting.
Clean voter rolls takes money and personnel. Not happening...
That is some serious willful ignorance there.
No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
Every American should be concerned about the integrity of the vote.Wrong, Democrats are angry about typical racist voter suppression as every American should be...
But as long as the Democrat wins, that means it was a fair election.
You see a link showing dead people voting...and you insist dead people aren't voting.And I'm telling you that the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line. I just spent last week going through a report that shows people who potentially "voted twice". Of the half dozen pages I went through, a number of those that showed up on the report (over a score) were from people who had signed on the wrong line of the roster.
Dead people aren't voting.
Clean voter rolls takes money and personnel. Not happening...
That is some serious willful ignorance there.
No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
You see a link showing dead people voting...and you insist dead people aren't voting.
That is some serious willful ignorance there.
No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
you keep saying 'most likely', but refuse to come out and say flat out 'dead people have never voted, period'.
Either it is, or is not possible. Either it did, or did not happen.
Which is it?
Uh huh. And you certainly have no agenda here.You see a link showing dead people voting...and you insist dead people aren't voting.
That is some serious willful ignorance there.
No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
you keep saying 'most likely', but refuse to come out and say flat out 'dead people have never voted, period'.
Either it is, or is not possible. Either it did, or did not happen.
Which is it?
What I have said is that it is unlikely that anyone is voting in place of a dead person. What I have said is that there are hundreds of dead people on ever single voter roll in this country. What I have pointed out is that in my personal experience, dead people aren't voting, but lots of people sign the roster on the wrong line...which applies the voting history to the line they signed, not the one they were supposed to.
Your username is misleading. Please change it to "Leftisthorseshitseeker".Every American should be concerned about the integrity of the vote.Wrong, Democrats are angry about typical racist voter suppression as every American should be...
But as long as the Democrat wins, that means it was a fair election.
But suppressing black and minority votes does not improve the integrity of the vote. And the biggest threat to the credibility of the election was Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004.
Support of Democrat voter fraud.Uh huh. And you certainly have no agenda here.No, the link showed that voting history was applied to someone who was deceased. That is NOT the same thing as someone voting in that dead individuals place. I'm telling you that, in my six years working for a county registrar, the most likely scenario is that someone signed the roster on the wrong line.
Oh, I see...I have an agenda but you don't? What's mine?
Your username is misleading. Please change it to "Leftisthorseshitseeker".Every American should be concerned about the integrity of the vote.
But as long as the Democrat wins, that means it was a fair election.
But suppressing black and minority votes does not improve the integrity of the vote. And the biggest threat to the credibility of the election was Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004.
When the RINO dominated repub party wants to present the facade that they are concerned about a matter beware.
Remember the voting fraud is in computerized voting by machines such as Diebold.
Diebold is a major investor in the RINO dominated repub party. Why should the USA be using Diebold machines?
Computers can be directed to vote wrong and you would not know the difference.
This same party wants to give Wall Street trillions of Social Security Insurance tax dollars
so they proceed to paint Social Security Insurance as this evil object that grows the deficit which is a complete lie. Social Security adds nothing to the deficit. Wall Street is a tax dollar moocher.
Medicare Insurance is the most efficient insurance program on the planet and is not free no way jose'.
The medical insurance industry sees trillions of tax dollars in the Medicare Insurance program and they want it. Yes the medical insurance industry is a tax dollar moocher.
The Iraq war is based on lies which makes war profiteers and their investors plenty of money. The Bush family are investors in weapons systems and set up deals. Iraq is painted as the evil empire over and over and over again. Trillions of dollars go into war aka one big money hole.
Americans should learn to ask questions and a lot of them when politicians begin selling the taxpayers a line of crap which could be most of the time. Politicians need to be looked upon as uninformed used car sales people until some hard evidence is presented
to substantiate their positions. Talk show hosts do not represent hard evidence across the board.
The fraud is in Diebold voting machines. BS ID cards cannot stop that which the RINO dominated party is well aware. There is no voting fraud of any significance anywhere in the USA except in computers.
Dump the computers!!!
Uh huh. And you certainly have no agenda here.
Oh, I see...I have an agenda but you don't? What's mine?
