Ernie S.
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2010
- 34,710
- 9,211
NO ONE UNDERPAYS THEIR EMPLOYEES.How is that relevant? It is not Walmart's duty to make people worth $X/hour. It is not their duty to pay more for a product or service than it is worth.Apparently it's time to post this again:And if they don't earn some of their money at Walmart, I have to pay for ALL of their upkeep. Be thankful that there are companies like Walmart that will employ unskilled workers and provide a part of their maintenance.Why is it business's fault that some people are worth no more than a wage they couldn't support a family on?
Would you pay top dollar for a TV that only got half the channels?
Why should Walmart pay employees based on the emotions of liberals?
They don't pay, you will.
I will pay an employee at or slightly above the prevailing rate for that skill set. What it costs you to support your life style is irrelevant.
![]()
Look at the "Yearly operating income growth." One model is losing money (that's what the red numbers and the minus sign mean), the other shows a 16.1% growth year over year.
Now, which one underpays its employees? That would be the one in the minus numbers.
Which one pays a decent wage? The one showing 16.1% growth.
Got it now?
Employees are paid what they are worth to the company, maybe a bit more to keep valued workers.
LOOK! When someone walks into Walmart and fills out an application and receives an offer, they are told what they will earn.
They have the opportunity to accept the wage offered or to walk out.
Once they have started work, they can do the minimum to get by and remain at their starting wage, or they can work hard, learn skills and make themselves more valuable.
What they should not be doing is using their lack of ambition and education as a political football.