Walz former superior: He "quit" rather than deploy and went over my head to do it.

[forkup]

What's good about him? And you are lying.

A teacher, and guardsman who served for 24 years, is more likely a better man than you are. Or me for that matter.

 

[westwall]

He was in operation Enduring Freedom AKA "the war on terror", providing base security in Europe, carrying weapons. As for his rank. Guard unit recognized for record deployment

Congressman Walz has a personal history with the Red Bulls, having retired in 2005 as command sergeant major

He never set foot in a combat zone as he has claimed MULTIPLE times, simp!

 

[westwall]

A teacher, and guardsman who served for 24 years, is more likely a better man than you are. Or me for that matter.

A teacher who indoctrinated his students, and sold this country put to the Chinese.

Next.

 

[forkup]

And then ran before deploying to a combat arena.

Dumbass.

He did not "run" he retired AFTER 24 YEARS. A person is allowed to retire after 20, he served for more. Who the fuck are you to complain about when a veteran retires?

By the way even if someone retires because he doesn't want to deploy anymore. Something that'll be hard to make stick considering the notice of deployment was issued months after he put in his retirement papers. He has a right to do so. And the military has a right to refuse that retirement. This didn't happen.

 

[forkup]

He never set foot in a combat zone as he has claimed MULTIPLE times, simp!

Nope he claimed he carried weapons in war. That's the only clip I've seen.

 

[westwall]

He did not "run" he retired AFTER 24 YEARS. A person is allowed to retire after 20, he served for more. Who the fuck are you to complain about when a veteran retires?

By the way even if someone retires because he doesn't want to deploy anymore. Something that'll be hard to make stick considering the notice of deployment was issued months after he put in his retirement papers. He has a right to do so. And the military has a right to refuse that retirement. This didn't happen.

He retired EARLY, and avoided his chain of command in doing so.

In other words, simp, he tucked tail and RAN!

 

[westwall]

Nope he claimed he carried weapons in war. That's the only clip I've seen.

In combat. Stop lying, you do it poorly. And even with your statement, it's still a lie.

 

[forkup]

He retired EARLY, and avoided his chain of command in doing so.

In other words, simp, he tucked tail and RAN!

Who says? He was a command master sergeant. He doesn't have to ask permission to retire from a person of the same fucking rank.

 

[forkup]

In combat. Stop lying, you do it poorly. And even with your statement, it's still a lie.

Nope "in war" feel free to post him claiming any time he served in combat. You claim it exists. Make me a liar.

As for my statement. You do realize it's the website of the national guard I sourced right?

 

[westwall]

Who says? He was a command master sergeant. He doesn't have to ask permission to retire from a person of the same fucking rank.

His COMMANDING OFFICER says it! So, who do I believe? A KNOWN liar, walz, or his CO?

I must say the desperation you simps are exhibiting trying to support that fraud is awesome!

 

[westwall]

Nope "in war" feel free to post him claiming any time he served in combat. You claim it exists. Make me a liar.

As for my statement. You do realize it's the website of the national guard I sourced right?

Who cares. As we have seen the official records are being altered to try and hide what a piece of shit he is.

 

[forkup]

In combat. Stop lying, you do it poorly. And even with your statement, it's still a lie.

Nope "in war" feel free to post him claiming any time he served in combat.

 

[forkup]

His COMMANDING OFFICER says it! So, who do I believe? A KNOWN liar, walz, or his CO?

I must say the desperation you simps are exhibiting trying to support that fraud is awesome!

He wasn't his CO. A command master sergeant is the highest ranking enlisted man in a battalion. In practice this means his CO is the battalion Commander

 

[forkup]

Who cares. As we have seen the official records are being altered to try and hide what a piece of shit he is.

This piece was posted in 2007. Lol

 

[forkup]

He retired EARLY, and avoided his chain of command in doing so.

In other words, simp, he tucked tail and RAN!

He retired for years AFTER he did his 20.

 

[westwall]

He retired for years AFTER he did his 20.

He contracted to take the necessary coursework to become a CSM. That included shipping out with his men if war came.

Instead of honoring his contract he went outside of his chain of command to secure his retirement.

Thus he was busted back down to Master Sgt.

 

[Nostra]

Nope "in war" feel free to post him claiming any time he served in combat. You claim it exists. Make me a liar.

As for my statement. You do realize it's the website of the national guard I sourced right?

War = combat.

Moron.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I guess all this "he retired before he knew he was going to be deployed" fake news is no longer gonna fly.

He knew he would be deployed before he put in for retirement and left his guys hanging.


COATES: Is your concern that it's -- oh, go ahead. I do want to ask this question quickly, Sergeant Major, and I appreciate your time, but is your -- [crosstalk] -- concern about the manner in which he did not speak to you or his decision to retire, which he, as we've talked about, he would have been entitled to do, which causes the most concern? Because that is the focus that so many people are wondering about, whether he has done something wrong in service or done something personally to offend you.

JULIN: No, he did something wrong in service, as I stated before. He knew the policies and procedures and how we go to leadership and address issues or discuss issues and concerns out there. Again, backing up, he had told me, no, I'm going forward, we're going to go with the battalion, and go from there. So, I'm under the believing, he told me he was going forward. I'm underneath that believing that he's going forward. He went around me, which he should have addressed it with me so he could help me with some things out there.

COATES: Sergeant Major, this was really -- excuse me, I don't want to cut you off, sir. Finish your point, please, Sergeant Major.

JULIN: He went around me. And the fact is that there's a possibility he probably would have realized. I would have probably said, no, it's too late, you're going forward, because we'd already received our notification of sourcing. And there's one other little point out there that people say, well, he hadn't been notified yet. Yes, he had been notified.

Now, there's another step out there. It is what's called stop loss. Ninety days prior to the actual deployment, we received our orders. And at that time is what's called stop loss, where if you're in a position, you're going forward irregardless, unless there's some really major or process --

COATES: Hmm, okay.

JULIN: -- that gets you out from not going on the deployment itself. So, there's that window of opportunity there. People say, well, he never knew he was going forward. Yeah, he knew he was going forward. Had he gotten his orders yet? No. At that time, he had not.

Walz' Former Superior: He 'Quit' Rather Than Deploy, And Went Over My Head to Get Out

hotair.com

/---/ ASweet karma for the democRATs who attacked GW Bush National Guard duty.

 

[Moonglow]

But your Tampon Boi claimed he was in war, Simp.

Too bad his own words TRUMP your pathetic spin.

being in war and being in combat are not one and the same.

 

[Moonglow]

War = combat.

Moron.

No, afraid not. Many serve during war and never see combat.